3. Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) - All submissions

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/45

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    The molecular mechanisms underpinning metabolic reprogramming in innate immunity and carcinogenesis: insights from toll-like receptor signalling
    (2019) Ubanako, Philemon Njende
    Tumour cells reprogram their metabolism by boosting glycolysis and suppressing oxidative phosphorylation despite adequate oxygen levels; a phenomenon known as the Warburg effect. Innate immune cells such as macrophages and dendritic cells also mimic the Warburg effect following infection for immune activation. Up to 20% of all lethal cancers are associated with infection. Microbial oncogenic transformation has been shown to be elicited by chronic inflammation because of prolonged infection. Nonetheless, metabolic reprogramming associated with infection has received little attention as a possible promoter in microbial carcinogenesis. THP-1 (acute monocytic) and K562 (chronic myelogenous) leukaemia cells were treated with TLR4 agonist, bacterial lipopolysaccharides at 5, 10 and 20 ng/ml for 24 and 48 hours. To evaluate cytokines synthesized, a multi-analyte ELISA array kit was used to investigate the expression of 12 pro-inflammatory cytokines. To further validate cytokine expression at the transcriptional level, reverse RT-PCR using gene-specific primers of upregulated cytokines observed in ELISA was performed. L-lactate and mitochondrial membrane potential assays were used to investigate metabolic reprogramming. Cell cycle analysis and cell viability assays were done. Finally, two in silico tools (GeneMANIA and IMP) were used to investigate gene interaction pathways and biological processes using upregulated cytokines and some glycolytic genes. In the present study, it is demonstrated that, in THP-1 monocytes, LPS can enhance the glycolytic phenotype in a TLR4-dependent manner. Although this has also been demonstrated in macrophages, this is the first time in undifferentiated monocytes. LPS also caused a decline in mitochondrial membrane potential which is characteristic decreased OxPhos. Furthermore, THP-1 monocytes were shown to upregulate pro-inflammatory chemokines; RANTES, IL8, MIP-1 and MDC at mRNA and protein levels in a TLR4-dependent manner. Interestingly, this study showed that RANTES, which was highly upregulated in THP-1 monocytes was not expressed in another myeloid-derived line – the K562 erythroleukaemia cell line even after LPS stimulation. Furthermore, LPS-mediated glycolytic phenotype in THP-1 monocytes which is reminiscent of the Warburg effect, is not accompanied by increased cell proliferation in this study and instead cell death is noticed upon LPS treatment. Furthermore, this study showed that the upregulated cytokines can be co-expressed and/or co-localised with certain glycolytic genes and glucose transporters (GLUT1 and GLUT3) suggesting a pathway for the observed enhancement for the glycolytic phenotype. Most importantly, all the upregulated cytokines were co-expressed with HK3, an enzyme that catalyses the first, irreversible step of glycolysis and has been shown to be instrumental in leukaemia pathogenesis. These findings show that infection-induced cytokines may interact with glycolytic genes to upregulate a glycolytic phenotype. However, glycolysis is dispensable for cell proliferation in THP-1 cells given that induction of the Warburg effect is insufficient to drive cell proliferation in THP-1 cells. These results indicate that innate immune cells express important chemokines which may influence their metabolic program. Furthermore, the study proposes that chemokines influence the metabolic programme in THP-1 monocytes likely through mechanisms that involve the glucose transporters (GLUT1 and GLUT3), HK3 and other glycolytic proteins
  • Item
    Targeting retinoblastoma binding protein 6 (RBBP6) as an anti-ovarian cancer therapeutic strategy
    (2015-05-07) Ubanako, Philemon Njende
    Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecological cancer. About 90% of ovarian cancers are epithelial (ovarian carcinomas), thought to arise from the ovarian surface epithelium. Diagnosed usually at clinically advanced stages, many patients show poor response to chemotherapy, with resistance and recurrent disease being prevalent. siRNA technology is currently being explored in clinical trials as a form of targeted therapeutic strategy in the disease. RBBP6 is a 250kD protein that enhances MDM2-mediated ubiquitination of p53 and also plays a role in cell cycle regulation and cell differentiation. It is upregulated in numerous cancers such as lung, oesophageal, colorectal and cervical cancer. RBBP6 suppresses p53 binding to DNA thereby inhibiting p53-dependent gene transcription. RBBP6 was knocked down using 30 nM siRNA in RMG-1 cells for 48 hours, after which the cells were treated with 50 nM paclitaxel and 0.5μM camptothecin for 24 hours. xCELLigence real time cell analysis was used to evaluate cell proliferation. qPCR and western blot were used to evaluate both gene expression and protein expressions respectively, of Bax, Bcl-2, MDM2, p53 and p21. Flow cytometry was used to determine the mode of cell death elicited apoptosis and also analyse changes in cell cycle progression. qPCR and Western blot analyses showed that RBBP6 expression reduced by approximately 57%. There was a significant upregulation of p53 and a significant downregulation of Bcl-2 in siRBBP6 transfected cells (p<0.05). Knockdown of RBBP6 resulted in a 37±5.8% cell death. There was a significant increase in cell death in paclitaxel and siRBBP6 co-treated cells (81.6±0.79%) as compared to cells treated with paclitaxel only (76.±1.14%). siRNA-mediated knock down of RBBP6 induces cell death in RMG-1 ovarian carcinoma cells. In addition, paclitaxel-induced cell death in RMG-1 cells is potentiated by RBBP6 siRNA transfection. A combination of chemotherapy with paclitaxel or camptothecin and RBBP6 siRNA could be a possible therapeutic strategy in combatting ovarian carcinomas.
Copyright Ownership Is Guided By The University's

Intellectual Property policy

Students submitting a Thesis or Dissertation must be aware of current copyright issues. Both for the protection of your original work as well as the protection of another's copyrighted work, you should follow all current copyright law.