3. Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) - All submissions
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/45
For queries relating to content and technical issues, please contact IR specialists via this email address : openscholarship.library@wits.ac.za, Tel: 011 717 4652 or 011 717 1954
Browse
1 results
Search Results
Item The fama-french five-factor model: evidence from the JSE(2018) Cox, ShaunThe desire to explain the returns of shares listed on stock exchanges has long driven research into asset pricing models. The formation of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) served as the starting point for almost all models derived to describe share returns. Further research into returns discovered that there were various risk factors that impacted share returns; these could be captured by market value (size) and the book-to-market ratio (value). In 1993, Eugene Fama and Kenneth French used these to expand on the CAPM. The Fama-French three-factor model created a framework to model returns and allowed for other researchers to explore asset pricing further. In 2015, Fama and French augmented their profitability and investment factors onto their threefactor model. The author of this study postulated that these additional factors may proxy for quality, a formally undefined characteristic of shares that is used in selecting investments. This study tested the effectiveness of the five-factor model and the additional factors in explaining returns on the Johannesburg Securities Exchange (JSE). The five-factor model was compared to the traditional size-value three-factor model as well as other three-factor models that incorporated the additional factors. Furthermore, the study looked at what premiums are present in the returns on the JSE and captured by the various models tested. The results show that the size-value and size-profitability three-factor models best describe time-series returns when comparing models. The five-factor model best explains the crosssection of returns and overall, the results identify a strong inverse size effect and value and market premiums. Interestingly, the strength of the original size-value three-factor model is reinforced. The additional factors of profitability and investment contribute to explaining the returns on the JSE. Furthermore, profitability could be seen as a contributing factor in a “quality premium”. In addition to being a risk factor, quality could also be used as a filter through which the traditional premiums like size or value can be unlocked.