School of Oral Health Sciences

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/18724

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Grossman, E. S.Subject: search.filters.subject.Dentin

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Microscope observations of ART excavated cavities and restorations
    (2002) Grossman, E. S.; Mickenautsch, S.
    This in vitro light and scanning electron microscope study examined 39 extracted tooth specimens, hand excavated and restored according to atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), using 'press finger', by 'skilled' and 'novice' operators. Surface features of five excavated cavities, 12 restoration surfaces and the tooth restoration relationships of 22 bisected restored tooth crowns were examined to better understand the clinical effect of the technique. Hand-excavated cavity surfaces were rough with a complex surface arrangement of grooves, crevices, ridges, furrows and overhangs. Enamel and dentine were covered with debris except where surface fractures exposed enamel prisms and occluded dentinal tubules. Ten of the 22 bisected restored specimens had large voids (1-3 mm in length) within the glass-ionomer cement (GIC) restoration or at the tooth-restoration interface. Smaller bubbles (< 50 microns) and irregular shaped inclusions were common in all restorations. Adaptation of the GIC to the cavity margin was extremely variable and easily distinguished from the effects of dehydration shrinkage. It is thought that cavity surface irregularities could cause placement problems making it difficult to adapt the GIC to cavity peripheries. While 'press finger' enabled excellent penetration of GIC into fissures, the technique left restoration surfaces rough. At low magnification, surfaces were irregular; at magnifications higher than X500 scratches, pits, porosities, chipping and voids were evident. However, the 'press finger' technique was able to merge the GIC to a fine edge on the occlusal surface so that the restoration margin was not obvious. No apparent difference was found between the restorations placed by the 'skilled' and 'novice' operators. Tooth-restoration relationships in the ART approach are entirely different to those of traditional restorative techniques. The ART approach requires skill, diligence and comprehension to be undertaken correctly.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Accurate diagnosis of occlusal carious lesions - a stereo microscope evaluation of clinical diagnosis
    (2002) Grossman, E. S.; Cleaton-Jones, P. E.; Côrtes, D. F.; et al
    This study was undertaken to validate the caries status of 214 teeth by serial sectioning and microscopy after caries diagnosis using four methods. Two hundred and fourteen extracted human teeth with varying degrees of caries were mounted in the jaws of nine training manikins. All tooth surfaces were examined and recorded for caries by four dentists using bitewing radiographs, fibre-optic transillumination (FOTI), mirror alone and a mirror and sharp probe on two separate occasions. Thereafter the teeth were serially sectioned and assessed microscopically for depth of caries lesion on a graded score of 0-7. This report assessed the diagnostic outcome of 2,183 observations for occlusal surfaces. Sound diagnoses predominated over unsound until caries was present in the inner half of dentine. Specificity was between 90% and 95% and sensitivity 26% and 50% depending on which diagnostic method was used and where the sound/unsound threshold was set. Negative and positive predictive values were similarly influenced and varied between 53% and 80% and 73% and 90%, respectively. Probit analysis showed no significant differences (P < 0.05) between examiners and diagnostic methods. Diagnosis of occlusal caries undertaken in an in vitro simulated clinical situation is inaccurate until the caries lesion extends deep into the dentine no matter which of the four methods was used.