School of Public Health (Journal Articles)

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10539/37879

Browse

Start date: 2024Subject: search.filters.subject.Masculinities

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ‘We do not like talking about our problems’: socialization and idealized masculinity as drivers of help-seeking avoidance among college men in South Africa
    (BioMed Central, 2025-03) Sikweyiya, Yandisa; Jewkes, Rachel; Machisa, Mercilene; Mahlangu, Pinky; Brooke-Sumner, Carrie; Gibbs, Andrew; Dartnall, Elizabeth; Pillay, Managa
    Background: This article explores how identities and contexts influence help-seeking avoidance behaviour among college men. Methods: This exploratory qualitative study purposively selected 88 male students (aged 18–30) from some universities and Technical and Vocational Training colleges (TVETs) in South Africa. Data were collected through focus group discussions (FGDs). Eight FGDs were conducted, one in each selected university (n = 2) and TVETs (n = 6) in 2018–2019. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results: We found that college men’s early life experiences and socialisation strongly influenced their ability to express emotion and access services when in need of help. The data also revealed a masculinity that men aspired to and wanted to be seen as embracing or personifying while on campus. Most men ascribed to an ideal of masculinity that made it difficult for them to share their feelings (e.g., emotional pain, sadness; and bottle their emotions) and seek help from campus-based counselors or peers. The few men who reported using campus mental health support services appraised them as unsuitable and unhelpful for them, and indicated a preference for services that were more culturally relevant. Most men indicated a preference for male counselors, of which there were very few. Conclusions: These findings may be useful for the formulation of evidence-based context-specific and culturally sensitive approaches for increasing men’s access to mental health and psychological support services on South African college campuses.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of witnessing abuse of their mother and childhood trauma on men’s perpetration of intimate partner violence in the cross-sectional UN multi-country study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific
    (Elsevier, 2025-01) Jewkes, Rachel; Shai, Nwabisa; Chirwa, Esnat; Naved, Ruchira Tabassum; Abrahams, Naeema; Ramsoomar, Leane; Dekel, Bianca; Gibbs, Andrew; Nothling, Jani; Willan, Samantha
    Trauma exposure and witnessing intimate partner violence (IPV) in childhood are recognised risk factors for IPV. Using the UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific dataset, we describe the pathways through which they influence adult IPV perpetration. Methods: In nine sites, from six countries, data were collected in a two-stage, randomly-selected household survey, with one man aged 18–49 years interviewed per house. 8379 interviews were completed with ever partnered men in Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea (Bougainville) and Sri Lanka. We present a Structural Equation Model (SEM) to understand paths through which childhood trauma and witnessing IPV impacted perpetration of physical or sexual IPV in adulthood. Results: Among the men, 25.5% had witnessed IPV, 47.0% had perpetrated physical or sexual IPV. Both wit nessing IPV and childhood trauma elevated the likelihood of such perpetration. The SEM showed four paths from witnessing IPV and childhood trauma to the latent variable for physical/sexual IPV perpetration. One was direct and three indirect. Paths were mediated by food insecurity, depression, and a latent variable measuring gender inequitable and anti-social masculinities. The masculinity variable indicators were drug use, harmful alcohol use, bullying, gang membership, fighting with other men, having sex with a sex worker and having raped a non partner. The direct and indirect effects showed both childhood trauma and witnessing maternal IPV to be important, but childhood trauma the more so. Conclusions: Both childhood trauma and witnessing IPV were important in driving IPV perpetration, with in dependent effects, however, broader childhood trauma exposure was most strongly associated. The effects were mediated by food insecurity, depression and gender inequitable and anti-social masculinities, all recognised risk factors for IPV perpetration. Thus, gender transformative IPV prevention interventions that include mental health and economic elements can mitigate the influence of these key exposures.