Situation Analyses

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/27956

These analyses reports focus on understanding the existing internal and external environment and how these influence M&E practice in the continent across the three sectors of society. Please read them here

Browse

Filters

20181

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.CLEAR-AASubject: search.filters.subject.Monitoring & Evaluation in Africa, COMPASS

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    COMPASS: Tracking monitoring and evaluation developments in Anglophone Africa
    (CLEAR-AA, 2018) CLEAR-AA
    Much of the existing literature around M&E and evaluation systems is based on European, North American and Latin American theory and practice, with little written about African M&E systems. For example, a study by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2016) explores evaluation systems in development cooperation focusing on 37 members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Network on Development Evaluation (EvalNet) and nine multilateral organisations, including six development banks, the European Commission, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Another example is Rosenstein’s (2015) Mapping the Status of National Evaluation Policies in South Asia. The Compass offers a snapshot of developments in M&E in Anglophone African countries and is designed to inform CLEAR-AA and development partners’ understanding of M&E systems and planning for capacity development interventions in these countries, as well as contribute to public debate on the development of national M&E systems, institutionalisation of evaluation, and use of M&E evidence in the larger African context.