African Studies Institute - Seminar Papers

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/7319

For information on accessing African Studies Institute - Seminar Papers collection content please contact Peter Duncan via email : peter.duncan@wits.ac.za

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.Land settlement. South Africa

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    "A documentary drama": The case of Malisela Letsoalo and the Banareng tribe versus the union government
    (1988-03-28) Starfield, Jane
    Tuesday 28 January 1958 was a tepid 20.8 degrees C in St George's Street, Cape Town. Not far off, the Houses of Parliament were considerably hotter. Generator of this heat was none other than the 'Famous Lawyer' and former Native Senator, Mr Hyman Meyer Basner. Basner had just bombarded every MP, including the Senate, with copies of an affidavit rebutting the Minister of Native Affairs' attack upon his integrity the day before.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    An interesting social experiment: White labour forestry settlement programme in South Africa, 1917-1938
    (1989-05-15) Roach, Tom
    Over seventy years ago, South Africa's Department of Forestry started a large scale tree planting programme. The scheme involved the establishment of communities of poor whites in areas suitable for afforestation. The residents of the settlements were recruited from amongst the nation's unemployed and dispossessed. The first settlements were founded in the Cape in 1917 and the final settlement was built in north- eastern Transvaal during 1934. For locations, see figure 1. Up to 1938, the settlements were operated by the Department of Forestry in conjunction with other government Departments, notably the Department of White Labour, the Department of Labour and the Department of Labour and Social Welfare. In 1938, control over the settlements was passed to the Department of Social Welfare. At the same time, the planting programme in which the settlers were taking part effectively came to an end. Basic details about the settlements are given in table 1.Today, South Africa, including the Bantustans, is nearly independent of outside sources for forest products such as sawn timber, wood pulp, paper, and many of the chemical derivatives of wood and cellulose. Practically all this material comes from trees grown in plantations. Currently, a total of 1 181 608 hectares are under cultivation of which 780 650 hectares, sixty-six percent, are privately owned. In 1987, some two hundred thousand people were employed in the forestry and timber industries of South Africa. Ninety percent of these employees were unskilled workers. Practically all employees, ninety-five percent, are African, thirty percent are women. Prior to the start of the settlement programme, the Union's Department of Forestry had planted approximately 14 000 hectares of woodland in addition to the 7 300 hectares afforested by the two British colonies in the years between 1880 and 1910. In the ensuing two decades, the Department planted some 100 760 hectares, about 26% of the afforested area owned by the government in 1987. This large and important industry got its start from the social experiment described in this paper.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    After years in the wilderness: development and the discourse of land claims in the new South Africa
    (1997-08-13) James, Deborah
    Anthropologists, it is currently claimed, can and should play a significant role in those processes of managed and haphazard social change subsumed under the heading of development (Pottier 1993). In South Africa, many anthropologists have acted - indirectly or directly - to defend the rights of communities subjected to the vagaries of the capitalist economy and to various forms of government planning. In relation to the former, they have documented the effects of labour migration and of the gradual decline in subsistence agriculture; while in relation to the latter they have looked at the social upheavals caused by population resettlement, whether these were the clear outcomes of state plans or rather more unforeseen. But a more novel and certainly more ambitious approach would be for the anthropologist's gaze to broaden, thus encompassing not only these local communities but also those who have represented, or worked to alleviate, their plight. My own analysis here is based on the discourse and rhetoric used not only by resettled people claiming restitution but also by parties - people in the "land" NGOs, in local and regional government, and in any of a number of newly-emerging consultant consortiums - who concern themselves with restoring territories to their claimants and with developing and improving these.