Research Outputs (Oral Health Sciences)

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/18776

Browse

Start date: 2000End date: 2001

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    To splint or not to splint, that is the question
    (2001) Volchansky, A.; Gavron, G.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    How does zinc oxide-eugenol compare to ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy material?
    (2001) Chien, MM; Setzer, S.; Cleaton-Jones, P.
    This study compared the clinical and radiographic responses after 3 months to a sterile compression technique with zinc oxide-eugenol or 15.5% ferric sulphate in 145 pulpotomised primary teeth in 30 children. In both groups of teeth the success rate was 100%. These short-term results suggest that either technique may be used.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Surface roughness of aesthetic restorative materials: an in vitro comparison
    (2001) Rosen, M.; Grossman, E. S.; Cleaton-Jones, P. E.
    The purpose of this study was to compare the surface roughness of three types of aesthetic restorative material. Six standard samples of two brands of each type of material were prepared namely: hybrid composites (Prodigy, Z100), compomers (Compoglass F, Hytac Aplitip) and glass ionomer cements (Photac-Fil, Vitremer) in a perspex mould (N = 36). Upper and lower surfaces were covered with Mylar strips which, in turn, were covered with glass slides and compressed to express excess material. After light curing, specimens were stored in distilled water for 14 days. Thereafter, one side of each specimen was polished sequentially with medium, fine and super fine Soflex discs (treatment). Untreated surfaces served as controls. All surfaces were examined with Talysurf and the surface roughness (Ra) of each specimen was recorded. Three measurements were made of each specimen. A 4-way ANOVA and Tukey's Studentised range test were used to analyse the data. Statistically significant effects were found for both type of material (P = 0.0001) and for treatment process (P = 0.0065). Among unpolished specimens: Compoglass F is significantly rougher than Vitremer, Z100, Prodigy and Hytac Aplitip, and compomers are significantly rougher than hybrids. Among polished specimens: Photac-Fil is significantly rougher than Z100 but does not differ from Compoglass F, Vitremer, Prodigy and Hytac Aplitip, and glass ionomers are also significantly rougher than hybrids. The smoothest surface is obtained when curing materials against a Mylar strip.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Examiner performance with visual, probing and FOTI caries diagnosis in the primary dentition
    (2001) Cleaton-Jones, P.; Daya, N.; Hargreaves, J. A.; et al.
    To compare clinical reproducibility of dental caries diagnosis in the primary dentition under field conditions, a convenience sample of 5-year-old children in a nursery school in Germiston, was examined for dental caries by four dentists using visual (mirror), visual plus tactile (mirror plus probe) and fibre-optic transillumination (FOTI) methods. Seventeen children were examined on day one and 11 re-examined on day two. Inter-examiner agreement was high, above 90%. Visual examination on its own is comparable with the traditional visual plus tactile method and to FOTI under field conditions. New caries data collected by visual diagnosis alone may, reasonably, be compared with historical data diagnosed with visual + tactile examination.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Bonding agents: adhesive layer thickness and retention to cavity surfaces with time
    (2001) Grossman, E. S.; Setzer, S.
    This study assessed bonding agent thickness, cover and the influence of long-term storage on bonding agent retention to enamel and dentine surfaces in cut occlusal cavities in 46 human molar teeth. Two specimens were etched and set aside. The remaining specimens were divided into two equal groups and treated with either Optibond or Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SMPP) up to the adhesive stage. Thereafter two specimens from each group were stored for 0, 1, 3, 7 and 14 days and 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months in 1% NaCl. After storage the cavity surfaces were examined in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and scored as to bonding agent cover. One specimen from each treatment was then embedded in resin, two sections prepared midway through each cavity, polished and re-examined in the SEM to measure bonding agent thickness at 13 sites along the cavity surface. Both bonding agents showed highly variable and significant (P < 0.05) bonding agent cover and layer thickness according to cavity site, SMPP more so than Optibond. Pooling of SMPP adhesive was apparent in cavity angles. Mean film thickness was significantly different between Optibond (221 +/- 130 microns) and SMPP (118 +/- 106 microns). There was no significant difference in bonding agent thickness between long- and short-term storage.