ETD Collection

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/104


Please note: Digitised content is made available at the best possible quality range, taking into consideration file size and the condition of the original item. These restrictions may sometimes affect the quality of the final published item. For queries regarding content of ETD collection please contact IR specialists by email : IR specialists or Tel : 011 717 4652 / 1954

Follow the link below for important information about Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD)

Library Guide about ETD

Browse

Filters

20061

Settings

Subject: search.filters.subject.NIOH

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Attribution of lung cancer to asbestos exposure in miners South Africa.
    (2006-11-17T11:32:16Z) Chauhan, Shobna
    An autopsy-based case-series of South African miners was used to evaluate the evidence required to attribute a miner’s lung cancer to occupational asbestos exposure for compensation. The slightly different Helsinki (1997) and National Institute for Occupational Health (NIOH) criteria (1988) require that one of four factors (asbestosis, occupational exposure, raised burden of asbestos fibres and/or bodies) be fulfilled for attribution. These criteria were applied to the case-series to determine and compare the proportions of NIOH- and Helsinki-attributable lung cancers. Of 195 lung cancer cases, 47% (91) were Helsinki-attributable and 52% (101) NIOH-attributable: with 72% concordance. Some differences in the details of occupational exposure criteria and methods for assessing the burden of asbestos in the lung were responsible for differences in these proportions. If attribution had taken place using only presence of asbestosis and the occupational exposure history, many cases would not have been attributable to asbestos. Therefore, taking into account burden of asbestos in lung tissue was important. However, it was found that phase contrast microscopy (PCM) for counting asbestos bodies was “sufficient” and that scanning electron microscopy (SEM), advocated by the Helsinki criteria, added <1% of the cases, suggesting that the cost of expensive SEM fibre counts in a developing country may outweigh the benefits. Using the Helsinki criteria as the gold standard, the sensitivity of the NIOH criteria was 75.8% (95% CI: 65.7 – 84.2).