ETD Collection

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/104


Please note: Digitised content is made available at the best possible quality range, taking into consideration file size and the condition of the original item. These restrictions may sometimes affect the quality of the final published item. For queries regarding content of ETD collection please contact IR specialists by email : IR specialists or Tel : 011 717 4652 / 1954

Follow the link below for important information about Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD)

Library Guide about ETD

Browse

Filters

20141

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Maifadi, JamesSubject: search.filters.subject.Carbon.

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    A comparative study of micro & nanocarbon reinforced synthetic rubber composites
    (2014-09-01) Maifadi, James
    This study concentrated on two main thrusts: 1) the optimal synthesis and characterisation of various micro- and nanosized carbon materials and 2) a comparative investigation of the capabilities of these carbonaceous materials to reinforce a locally available styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), which was commonly used to make car tyres. In the former case, a range of carbon materials including nitrogen doped/undoped carbon nanotubes as well as carbon microspheres (CMSs) were successfully synthesized by two different techniques (i.e. chemical vapour deposition (CVD) and hydrothermal synthesis). These were then fully characterised by numerous techniques which included: TEM, TGA, FTIR, PXRD, laser Raman spectroscopy, Zeta potential measurements and BET surface area analysis. In the latter case, these micro and nanocarbon materials were systematically added to SBR at various loadings (ranging from 0.125–0.500% (m/m)). Here the tensile strengths of the resultant composites, loaded with these various micro and nanocarbon materials, were measured for comparison to establish which (if any) was the best reinforcement material for SBR. Results obtained from the tensile strength measurements of the variously loaded SBR composites, showed that irrespective of the method of synthesis (i.e. CVD or hydrothermal synthesis) carbon microspheres (undoped, doped, functionalised or unfuntionalised) performed more poorly as fillers than carbon nanotubes. Furthermore the results obtained, from the various characterisation techniques mentioned previously, indicated that the lower performance of these microspheres as fillers may have been due to their: size, shape and low surface areas. By contrast when the tensile strengths of SBR reinforced with either CNTs or NCNTs were measured, the former outperformed the latter as fillers. It was speculated, based upon the data obtained, that NCNTs were poorer fillers than CNTs due to their higher negative surface charges, larger diameters and lower crystallinity. Hence this study has shown that low loadings (i.e. 0.250 % (m/m)) of the correctly matched type of carbonaceous material can significantly enhance the tensile strength and Young’s modulus of a locally available styrene butadiene rubber.