ETD Collection

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/104


Please note: Digitised content is made available at the best possible quality range, taking into consideration file size and the condition of the original item. These restrictions may sometimes affect the quality of the final published item. For queries regarding content of ETD collection please contact IR specialists by email : IR specialists or Tel : 011 717 4652 / 1954

Follow the link below for important information about Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD)

Library Guide about ETD

Browse

Filters

20171

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Deacon, Jacques

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Explicit and implicit geological modelling methods on resource definition and resource utilisation - Sishen iron ore deposit case study
    (2017) Deacon, Jacques
    Technological advances make geological modelling easier and more intuitive than ever before. There is a clear shift in the mining industry concerning the needs of the geological model and its function. Geological modelling is one of the first steps in the resource evaluation process; its primary function is to define the orebody’s physical properties and characteristics. It can, therefore, be argued that the geological model has a commanding impact on the entire resource evaluation process. Although many publications exist regarding modelling conventions, few truly compare the explicit versus implicit approaches and document the observed differences. This case study on the Sishen iron ore deposit shows that modern implicit modelling techniques can create geological models comparable to those created using traditional wireframing techniques. In many aspects, these implicit models are superior to their explicit counterparts due to their increased modelling speed and multiple data source inclusion. The implicit modelling process delivered a geological model with modelled ore volumes equivalent to those of the traditional explicit geological model. However, spatial reconciliation between the explicit and implicit versions of the Sishen geological models showed substantial discrepancies due to fundamental differences in geometry and connectivity, and modelling conventions. These differences in the geological models are manifested in considerable change in the final, defined Sishen resource. This case study for the Sishen iron ore deposit confirms that geological models are critical to the entire resource definition and extraction process. Any resource evaluation and planned extraction activity is only as accurate as the geological model used to define the resource originally. This study also shows how critical it is to test geological model performance through the entire mining value chain. Basic volumetric comparisons or tonnage reconciliations can mask the effects of geological modelling approaches on resource definition and extraction.