Browsing by Author "Machisa, Mercilene Tanyaradzwa"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    An investigation of the association between household biomass fuel smoke exposure, anaemia and stunting in children aged 12-59 months participating in the 2006-2007 Swaziland Demographic and Health Survey
    (2013-01-25) Machisa, Mercilene Tanyaradzwa
    Background Indoor air pollution due to use of biomass fuels (BMF) for household cooking and heating is a known risk factor of morbidity and mortality in children under the age of five years. A recent study in India suggested an association between biomass fuel smoke exposure anaemia and stunting among children under the age of five. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between BMF use, stunting and anaemia in children aged 12-59 months who participated in the 2006-2007 Swaziland Demographic and Health Survey (SDHS), whilst adjusting for potential confounders. Methods The study was cross-sectional and based on secondary data analysis of data collected through the household and women’s questionnaires in the 2006-2007 SDHS, which employed a multistage random sampling. Anthropometric measurements taken in the SDHS and the World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 Multi-Centre Child growth reference standards were used to ascertain children’s health status and the stunting outcome variable. A child, whose height-for-age ratio was below three standard deviations (SD) from the median of the WHO reference population in terms of height-for-age, was severely stunted or short for his/her age. A child, whose height-for-age ratio was between three and two SD below the median of the WHO reference population in terms of height-for-age, was mildly stunted. The exposure to BMF smoke variable was ascertained indirectly by type of fuel used for cooking. The exposure was a three category variable of cleaner fuel, outdoor BMF and indoor BMF use. All statistical analysis was done in STATA version 10. The relationship between BMF use and stunting or anaemia was determined using multinomial logistic regression analyses, whilst adjusting for potential confounding factors, identified in previous research. Results Of the 1612 children included in the study, 37% were anaemic. Nineteen percent were mildly and 18% were moderate to severely anaemic. Indoor BMF use, child age, low birth weight, mother’s age at birth, iron supplementation during pregnancy and mother’s anaemia status was significantly associated with child anaemia in univariate analysis. Outdoor BMF exposure, low birth weight, child age, mother’s anaemia status and wealth index was associated with child anaemia after adjusting for potential confounding. Overall 31% of children were stunted. Twenty percent were mildly stunted and 11% were moderate to severely stunted. Child sex, age, birth order, preceding birth interval, low birth weight, diarrhoea in preceding two weeks, anaemia status, iron supplementation during pregnancy, mother’s age at birth ,mother’s body mass index, mother’s education, wealth index, indoor BMF exposure and household crowding were each independently associated with stunting in univariate analysis. Only child sex, low birth weight and child age were significantly associated with stunting after adjusting for potential confounding. There was no evidence of an association between indoor BMF smoke exposure and child stunting after adjusting for all potential confounding factors. Conclusion This study did not find sufficient evidence to suggest that indoor BMF use is a statistically significant risk factor for anaemia or stunting in children aged 12-59 months participating in the 2006-2007 SDHS. There was however an evidence that, use of BMF outdoors significantly confers a protective effect against moderate to severe anaemia. Prospective research into these potential relationships are necessary, particularly the collection of primary data and accurate measurement of exposure to smoke emitted during BMF use for cooking and heating.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Refusal of male partner responsibility and pregnancy support: prevalence, associated factors and health outcomes in a cross sectional study in Harare, Zimbabwe
    (BioMed Central, 2025-03) Shamu, Simukai; Machisa, Mercilene Tanyaradzwa; Shamu, Patience
    Background The phenomenon of fathers refusing responsibility during pregnancy has not received adequate attention in African studies. This paper assesses associated factors and pregnancy-related outcomes when fathers refuse to support partners’ pregnancies and undertake parental responsibilities. Methods A cross-sectional survey of 15–49-year-old postnatal (1–6 weeks) women was conducted at six urban health facilities in Harare. Participants were interviewed about their male partners’ refusal to support their pregnancies and parenting, bride price payments (indicating marriage commitment), partner violence and control, alcohol abuse and family planning decision-making. Pregnancy health outcome data including antenatal care attendance, low birth weight (LBW)(<2500 g) and postnatal depression were collected through interviews and clinic records. Multiple regression models were built to assess gender-related factors and health outcomes associated with male partners’ refusal of parenting responsibilities. Results Of the 2042 women interviewed, 6.4% reported partner refusal to support the pregnancy or parenting. Higher odds of partner refusal of fathering responsibility were associated with partners not paying bride price (aOR 9.31; 95% CI 1.16–74.59), violence perpetration during pregnancy (aOR 2.84; 1.28–6.23), highly controlling behaviours (aOR 4.96; 2.83–8.69), alcohol abuse (aOR 1.78; 1.05–3.02), unintended pregnancy (aOR 3.72; 1.84–7.53) and partner refusal to use contraceptives (aOR 3.64; 1.86–7.14). Women who used contraceptives (aOR 0.40; 0.23–0.71), made joint (aOR 0.30; 0.14–0.67) or individual (aOR 0.25; 0.07–0.94) pregnancy decisions were protected from partner refusal of parenting responsibility. Women’s depressive symptomatology (aOR2.64; 1.52–4.59), LBW (aOR5.30; 1.18–23.74) and partner discouragement of antenatal care attendance (aOR 3.86; 1.13–13.17) were pregnancy outcomes associated with partner refusal of parenting responsibility. Conclusions Male partners’ refusal to acknowledge parenting responsibility was associated with men’s abusiveness, absence of commitment to long-term relationship/marriage, gender unequal practices and negative maternal and child health outcomes. Parenting programmes must be instituted and prioritise transforming traditional gender norms to improve fathering responsibilities.