Browsing by Author "Jennifer Manne-Goehler"

Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Blood pressure increases are associated with weight gain and not antiretroviral regimen or kidney function a secondary analysis from the ADVANCE trial in South Africa
    (INT AIDS SOCIETY) Jennifer Manne-Goehler; June Fabian; Simiso Sokhela; Godspower Akpomiemie; N Rahim; Samanta Lalla-Edward; Alana Brennan; M Siedner; A Hill; Willem Venter
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Data Resource Profile: The Global Health and Population Project on Access to Care for Cardiometabolic Diseases (HPACC)
    (2022-12-13) Jennifer Manne-Goehler; Michaela Theilmann; David Flood; Maja E Marcus; Glennis Andall-Brereton; Kokou Agoudavi; William Andres Lopez Arboleda; Krishna K Aryal; Brice Bicaba; Pascal Bovet; Luisa Campos Caldeira Brant; Garry Brian; Grace Chamberlin; Geoffrey Chen; Albertino Damasceno; Maria Dorobantu; Matthew Dunn; Cara Ebert; Farshad Farzadfar; Mongal Singh Gurung; David Guwatudde; Corine Houehanou; Dismand Houinato; Nahla Hwalla; Jutta M Adelin Jorgensen; Khem B Karki; Demetre Labadarios; Nuno Lunet; Deborah Carvalho Malta; Joao S Martins; Mary T Mayige; Roy Wong McClure; Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam; Kibachio J Mwangi; Omar Mwalim; Bolormaa Norov; Sarah Quesnel-Crooks; Sabrina Rhode; Jacqueline A Seiglie; Abla Sibai; Bahendeka K Silver; Lela Sturua; Andrew Stokes; Adil Supiyev; Lindiwe Tsabedze; Zhaxybay Zhumadilov; Lindsay M Jaacks; Rifat Atun; Justine I Davies
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The HIV Care Cascade for Older Adults in Rural South Africa A Longitudinal Cohort Study 20142019
    J K Rohr; Jennifer Manne-Goehler; Francesc Gomez-Olive Casas; Kathleen Kahn; Barnighausen Till
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Patterns of tobacco use in low and middle income countries by tobacco product and sociodemographic characteristics: nationally representative survey data from 82 countries
    (2022-07-01) Michaela Theilmann; Julia M Lemp; Volker Winkler; Jennifer Manne-Goehler; Maja E Marcus; Charlotte Probst; William A Lopez-Arboleda; Cara Ebert; Christian Bommer; Maya Mathur; Glennis Andall-Brereton; Silver K Bahendeka; Pascal Bovet; Farshad Farzadfar; Erfan Ghasemi; Mary T Mayige; Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam; Kibachio J Mwangi; Shohreh Naderimagham; Lela Sturua; Rifat Atun; Justine I Davies; Till Bärnighausen; Sebastian Vollmer; Pascal Geldsetzer
    Objectives To determine the prevalence and frequency of using any tobacco product and each of a detailed set of tobacco products, how tobacco use and frequency of use vary across countries, world regions, and World Bank country income groups, and the socioeconomic and demographic gradients of tobacco use and use frequency within countries. Design Secondary analysis of nationally representative, crosssectional, household survey data from 82 low and middle income countries collected between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020. Setting Population based survey data. Participants 1231068 individuals aged 15 years and older. Main outcome measures Self-reported current smoking, current daily smoking, current smokeless tobacco use, current daily smokeless tobacco use, pack years, and current use and use frequencies of each tobacco product. Products were any type of cigarette, manufactured cigarette, hand rolled cigarette, water pipe, cigar, oral snuff, nasal snuff, chewing tobacco, and betel nut (with and without tobacco). Results The smoking prevalence in the study sample was 16.5% (95% confidence interval 16.1% to 16.9%) and ranged from 1.1% (0.9% to 1.3%) in Ghana to 50.6% (45.2% to 56.1%) in Kiribati. The user prevalence of smokeless tobacco was 7.7% (7.5% to 8.0%) and prevalence was highest in Papua New Guinea (daily user prevalence of 65.4% (63.3% to 67.5%)). Although variation was wide between countries and by tobacco product, for many low and middle income countries, the highest prevalence and cigarette smoking frequency was reported in men, those with lower education, less household wealth, living in rural areas, and higher age. Co nclusions Both smoked and smokeless tobacco use and frequency of use vary widely across tobacco products in low and middle income countries. This study can inform the design and targeting of efforts to reduce tobacco use in low and middle income countries and serve as a benchmark for monitoring progress towards national and international goals.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reaching for the 'first 95': a cross-country analysis of HIV self-testing in nine countries in sub-Saharan Africa
    (2022-02) Eva van Empel; Rebecca A De Vlieg; Guy Harling; Maja E Marcus; Kathleen Kahn; Till W Bärnighausen; Livia Montana; Augustine T Choko; Jennifer Manne-Goehler
    Objectives: HIV self-testing (HIVST) offers a promising approach to increase HIV diagnosis and advance progress towards the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets. We aimed to understand patterns of HIVST awareness and utilization in nine sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, with the goal of identifying populations to target in disseminating this technology. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: We pooled individual-level population-based data from nine Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) in SSA conducted 2015-2019 (Burundi, Cameroon, Guinea, Malawi, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Zambia, Zimbabwe). Primary outcomes were HIVST awareness and utilization. We used logistic regression with survey fixed effects to explore the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and these outcomes. Models were adjusted for sex, age, rural/urban residence, education, wealth, and marital status. We accounted for complex survey design. Results: The study sample included 177 572 people (66.0% women, mean age 29 ± 10 years), of whom 86.6% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 86.4-86.7] were unaware of HIVST, 11.7% (95% CI 11.6-11.9) were aware of but never used HIVST, and 1.7% (95% CI 1.6-1.8) had used HIVST. In adjusted models, women were less likely to be aware of HIVST [odds ratio (OR) 0.75, 95% CI 0.71-0.79], but more likely to have used HIVST (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.32) compared with men. Rural residents, those who were least educated, and poorest were less likely to have heard of or used HIVST. Conclusion: HIVST awareness and uptake were low. Rural, less educated, and lower income populations were least likely to have heard of or used HIVST. Efforts to scale-up HIVST in these settings should aim to reach these less advantaged groups.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Rural-Urban Differences in Diabetes Care and Control in 42 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Cross-sectional Study of Nationally Representative Individual-Level Data
    (2022-09) David Flood; Pascal Geldsetzer; Kokou Agoudavi; Krishna K. Aryal; Luisa Campos Caldeira Brant; Garry Brian; Maria Dorobantu; Farshad Farzadfar; Oana Gheorghe-Fronea; Mongal Singh Gurung; David Guwatudde; Corine Houehanou; Jutta M. Adelin Jorgensen; Dimple Kondal; Demetre Labadarios; Maja E. Marcus; Mary Mayige; Mana Moghimi; Bolormaa Norov; Gaston Perman; Sarah Quesnel-Crooks; Mohammad-Mahdi Rashidi; Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam; Jacqueline A. Seiglie; Silver K. Bahendeka; Eric Steinbrook; Michaela Theilmann; Lisa J. Ware; Sebastian Vollmer; Rifat Atun; Justine I. Davies; Mohammed K. Ali; Peter Rohloff; Jennifer Manne-Goehler
    OBJECTIVE Diabetes prevalence is increasing rapidly in rural areas of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), but there are limited data on the performance of health systems in delivering equitable and effective care to rural populations. We therefore assessed rural-urban differences in diabetes care and control in LMICs. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We pooled individual-level data from nationally representative health surveys in 42 countries. We used Poisson regression models to estimate age-adjusted differences in the proportion of individuals with diabetes in rural versus urban areas achieving performance measures for the diagnosis, treatment, and control of diabetes and associated cardiovascular risk factors. We examined differences across the pooled sample, by sex, and by country. RESULTS The pooled sample from 42 countries included 840,110 individuals (35,404 with diabetes). Compared with urban populations with diabetes, rural populations had 15–30% lower relative risk of achieving performance measures for diabetes diagnosis and treatment. Rural populations with diagnosed diabetes had a 14% (95% CI 5–22%) lower relative risk of glycemic control, 6% (95% CI 25 to 16%) lower relative risk of blood pressure control, and 23% (95% CI 2–39%) lower relative risk of cholesterol control. Rural women with diabetes had lower achievement of performance measures relating to control than urban women, whereas among men, differences were small. CONCLUSIONS Rural populations with diabetes experience substantial inequities in the achievement of diabetes performance measures in LMICs. Programs and policies aiming to strengthen global diabetes care must consider the unique challenges experienced by rural populations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Use of statins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in 41 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative, individual-level data
    (2022-03) Maja E Marcus; Jennifer Manne-Goehler; Michaela Theilmann; Farshad Farzadfar; Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam; Mohammad Keykhaei; Amirali Hajebi; Scott Tschida; Julia M Lemp; Krishna K Aryal; Matthew Dunn; Corine Houehanou; Silver Bahendeka; Peter Rohloff; Rifat Atun; Till W Bärnighausen; Pascal Geldsetzer; Manuel Ramirez-Zea; Vineet Chopra; Michele Heisler; Justine I Davies; Mark D Huffman; Sebastian Vollmer; David Flood
    Background: In the prevention of cardiovascular disease, a WHO target is that at least 50% of eligible people use statins. Robust evidence is needed to monitor progress towards this target in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where most cardiovascular disease deaths occur. The objectives of this study were to benchmark statin use in LMICs and to investigate country-level and individual-level characteristics associated with statin use. Methods: We did a cross-sectional analysis of pooled, individual-level data from nationally representative health surveys done in 41 LMICs between 2013 and 2019. Our sample consisted of non-pregnant adults aged 40-69 years. We prioritised WHO Stepwise Approach to Surveillance (STEPS) surveys because these are WHO's recommended method for population monitoring of non-communicable disease targets. For countries in which no STEPS survey was available, a systematic search was done to identify other surveys. We included surveys that were done in an LMIC as classified by the World Bank in the survey year; were done in 2013 or later; were nationally representative; had individual-level data available; and asked questions on statin use and previous history of cardiovascular disease. Primary outcomes were the proportion of eligible individuals self-reporting use of statins for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Eligibility for statin therapy for primary prevention was defined among individuals with a history of diagnosed diabetes or a 10-year cardiovascular disease risk of at least 20%. Eligibility for statin therapy for secondary prevention was defined among individuals with a history of self-reported cardiovascular disease. At the country level, we estimated statin use by per-capita health spending, per-capita income, burden of cardiovascular diseases, and commitment to non-communicable disease policy. At the individual level, we used modified Poisson regression models to assess statin use alongside individual-level characteristics of age, sex, education, and rural versus urban residence. Countries were weighted in proportion to their population size in pooled analyses. Findings: The final pooled sample included 116 449 non-pregnant individuals. 9229 individuals reported a previous history of cardiovascular disease (7·9% [95% CI 7·4-8·3] of the population-weighted sample). Among those without a previous history of cardiovascular disease, 8453 were eligible for a statin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (9·7% [95% CI 9·3-10·1] of the population-weighted sample). For primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, statin use was 8·0% (95% CI 6·9-9·3) and for secondary prevention statin use was 21·9% (20·0-24·0). The WHO target that at least 50% of eligible individuals receive statin therapy to prevent cardiovascular disease was achieved by no region or income group. Statin use was less common in countries with lower health spending. At the individual level, there was generally higher statin use among women (primary prevention only, risk ratio [RR] 1·83 [95% CI 1·22-2·76), and individuals who were older (primary prevention, 60-69 years, RR 1·86 [1·04-3·33]; secondary prevention, 50-59 years RR 1·71 [1·35-2·18]; and 60-69 years RR 2·09 [1·65-2·65]), more educated (primary prevention, RR 1·61 [1·09-2·37]; secondary prevention, RR 1·28 [0·97-1·69]), and lived in urban areas (secondary prevention only, RR 0·82 [0·66-1·00]). Interpretation: In a diverse sample of LMICs, statins are used by about one in ten eligible people for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and one in five eligible people for secondary prevention. There is an urgent need to scale up statin use in LMICs to achieve WHO targets. Policies and programmes that facilitate implementation of statins into primary health systems in these settings should be investigated for the future.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item