Browsing by Author "James Ashton"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Consensus study on factors influencing the academic entrepreneur in a middle-income country’s university enterprise
    (2023-05-20) Alfred Austin Farrell; James Ashton; WitnessMapanga; Maureen Joffe; Nombulelo Chitha; Mags Beksinska; Wezile Chitha; Ashraf Coovadia; Clare L. Cutland; RobinL. Drennan; Kathleen Kahn; Lizette L. Koekemoer; Lisa K.Micklesfield; JacquiMiot; Julian Naidoo; Maria Papathanasopoulos; Warrick Sive; Jenni Smit; StephenM. Tollman; Martin G. Veller; Lisa J.Ware; Jeffrey Wing; Shane A. Norris
    Purpose – This study aims to ascertain the personal characteristics of a group of successful academic entrepreneurs in a South African university enterprise and the prevalent barriers and enablers to their entrepreneurial endeavour. Design/methodology/approach – The authors used a Delphi process to identify and rank the characteristics, enablers, barriers and behaviours of entrepreneurial academics, with a Nominal Group Technique applied to establish challenges they encounter managing their enterprise and to propose solutions. Findings – Perseverance, resilience and innovation are critical personal characteristics, while collaborative networks, efficient research infrastructure and established research competence are essential for success. The university’s support for entrepreneurship is a significant enabler, with unnecessary bureaucracy and poor access to project and general enterprise funding an impediment. Successful academic entrepreneurs have strong leadership, and effective management and communication skills. Research limitations/implications – The main limitation is the small study participant group drawn from a single university enterprise, which complicates generalisability. The study supported the use of Krueger’s (2009) entrepreneurial intentions model for low- and middle-income country (LMIC) academic entrepreneur investigation but proposed the inclusion of mitigators to entrepreneurial activation to recognize contextual deficiencies and challenges.