Browsing by Author "Cook, Robin Michael"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Elephant impact on marula trees, and African honeybees as a mitigation method
    (2017) Cook, Robin Michael
    Concerns exist over the continual decline of marula trees (Sclerocarya birrea subsp. caffra) as a result of African elephant (Loxodonta africana) impact and a lack of recruitment and regeneration. One strategy of protecting adult marula trees is the usage of elephant mitigation methods. This study took place in Jejane Private Nature Reserve (JPNR), a protected area which recently opened up to the Greater Kruger National Park and had not had elephants in over 100 years. The aim of the study was to investigate the changes to the marula population structure in JPNR three years after the migration of elephants to the area due to fence removal, and to test whether African honeybees (Apis mellifera subsp. scutellata) could be used as a mitigation method for elephant impact on marula trees. A previous size-class survey had been done on a sample of JPNR’s marula population in 2009, prior to the fence removal in 2013. A resurvey of these trees was used to assess the elephant-induced impact and mortality levels on the marula trees and to compare these levels to previously recorded impact and mortality levels on marula trees in the Kruger National Park (KNP). Marula seed predation levels and seedling recruitment were also assessed to address recruitment concerns. The resurveyed marula population had declined by 23.8% post-elephant migration, with the highest annual mortality rates (AMR) and impact scores recorded for trees in the 5 - 11 m height classes. Impact scores on marula trees in JPNR were higher than impact scores recorded on KNP marula trees. Only two marula seedlings were found across all transects, with evidence of high seed predation on marula endocarps. JPNR displayed an adult-dominated marula population with a lack of regeneration, possibly due to a lack of fire which has increased available shelter for seed predators such as small mammals. African honeybees were then used to investigate their effectiveness as an elephant mitigation method and to compare this method against wire-netting (a method experimentally used to prevent ring-barking by elephants). Fifty active beehives were hung from 50 marula trees, with another 50 dummy (inactive) beehives hung from branches on the opposite ends of each beehive tree’s main stem. Fifty additional marula trees were wire-netted and a further 50 were used as control trees. Elephant impact on all 150 trees was measured prior to the addition of treatments and post-treatment addition for nine months. 54% of the control trees received some form of elephant impact, in comparison to 28% of the wire-netted trees and only 2% of the beehive trees. Wire-netting protected marula trees against bark-stripping, but did not prevent elephants from breaking branches. Beehives proved highly efficient at mitigating all forms of elephant impact. The financial cost and maintenance required for the beehive mitigation method is greater than that of wire- netting, but the beehives can provide honey and pollination services as an additional benefit. The results of this study illustrate that African honeybees can be used as an effective non-lethal mitigation method for elephant impact on marula trees and are a viable strategy to reduce human-elephant conflict in South Africa’s protected areas.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The value of large trees and their protection where elephants and trees co-exist
    (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2024) Cook, Robin Michael; Henley, Michelle; Witkowski, Edward
    Increasing African elephant (Loxodonta africana) numbers in many southern African protected areas have raised concerns about their impact on large tree species and subsequent effects on biodiversity. However, sustainable strategies for managing elephant impact on particular large trees of concern require stakeholder support. Concerned stakeholders in South Africa's Associated Private Nature Reserves (APNR), a protected area containing a high density of waterholes and elephants, are implementing tree protection methods to protect large trees from elephant impact, but few studies have assessed these methods’ efficacy. This thesis aimed to understand stakeholder perception of the value of large trees. Thereafter, I investigate elephant impact on the large tree component within the APNR over a 12-year period while also assessing the relationship between the persistence of the nests of large tree nesting birds and that of the trees themselves. Lastly, I assessed the effectiveness of various implemented tree protection methods to mitigate against elephant impact. A combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis was used to measure stakeholders’ values on large tree and elephant population dynamics, as well as management strategies to reduce the impact on large trees. The results show that stakeholders were concerned about the loss of large trees and its impact on other species. However, they disagreed on the most effective management strategy to minimise elephant impact, with varying values across stakeholder generations and professions. The persistence trends of 2,758 large trees comprising three species of concern were analysed between 2008-2020 to understand the impact of elephants and other environmental factors on tree mortality. The annual large tree mortality rate from 2008-2020 was 5.6%, with varying declines among tree species and the most significant declines occurring during dry periods. Furthermore, the long-term impact of elephants on trees nested in by the critically endangered white-backed vulture (WbV, Gyps africanus) was studied in riparian and woodland habitats to investigate both tree and nest persistence. Ten tree species were utilised for nesting sites, with woodland trees more at risk to elephant impact verses those in the riparian habitat. However, there was no direct correlation between WbV nest loss and tree fall. Lastly, when considering tree protection methods, about half of the 2,758 trees surveyed were wire-netted as potential elephant impact mitigation strategy. Trees with a stem diameter >40 cm that were wire-netted had the highest persistence rates, but the wire-netting needed replacing after four years. Overall, wire-netting was the most practical method for larger- scale implementation, particularly on larger trees elephants cannot push over. Of the four tree protection methods evaluated in this study in terms of their effectiveness and practicality as a mitigation strategy, beehives were found to be the most effective at protecting trees but proved to be the most expensive in comparison to wire-netting, concrete pyramids and creosote jars