The attitudes of advocates to phychological testimony in court

dc.contributor.authorAnnecke, Julian Paul
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-06T14:12:47Z
dc.date.available2017-03-06T14:12:47Z
dc.date.issued1991
dc.descriptionA dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Arts, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg for the degree of Master of Art (Clinical Psychology), Johannesburg, June 1991en_ZA
dc.description.abstractThe literature in this area suggest that the legal profession has inconsistent contradictory and essentially ambivalent attitudes towards psychological testimony in court. This study seeks to begin an exploration and descriptiion of the attitudes of a subsection of that profession viz advocates, to psychological testimony in court. [Abbreviated Abstract. Open document to view full version]en_ZA
dc.description.librarianGR2017en_ZA
dc.format.extentOnline resource (101 leaves)
dc.identifier.citationAnnecke, Julian Paul (1991) The attitudes of advocates to psychological testimony in court, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg,<http://hdl.handle.net/10539/22165>
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/22165
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.subject.lcshPsychodiagnostics--South Africa
dc.subject.lcshEvidence, Expert--Psychological aspects--South Africa
dc.subject.lcshLaw--South Africa--Psychology
dc.titleThe attitudes of advocates to phychological testimony in courten_ZA
dc.typeThesisen_ZA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Annecke Julian Paul._The Attitudes Of Advocates To.pdf
Size:
6.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections