A quantitative correlation between the mining rock mass rating and in-situ rock mass rating classification systems

dc.contributor.authorDyke, Gregory Paul
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-20T11:20:08Z
dc.date.available2008-05-20T11:20:08Z
dc.date.issued2008-05-20T11:20:08Z
dc.description.abstractThe three most common rock mass classification systems in use in the South African mining industry today are Bieniawski’s (1976) Geomechanics or RMR System, Barton et al.’s (1974) Q-System and Laubscher’s (1990) MRMR System respectively. Of these three systems, only the MRMR Classification System was developed specifically for mining applications, namely caving operations. In response to the increased use of the MRMR Classification System in the mining industry, and concerns that the MRMR System does not adequately address the role played by discontinuities, veins and cemented joints in a jointed rock mass, Laubscher and Jakubec introduced the In-Situ Rock Mass Rating System (IRMR) in the year 2000. A quantitative comparison of the MRMR and IRMR Classification Systems has been undertaken to determine a correlation between the two classification systems, the results of which indicate that there is not a major difference between the resultant rock mass rating values derived from the two Classification Systems. Therefore, although the IRMR System is more applicable to a jointed rock mass than the MRMR System, the MRMR System should not be regarded as redundant, as it still has a role to play as a mine design tool.en
dc.format.extent945233 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/4858
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectrock mass classificationen
dc.subjectIn-Situ Rock Mass qualityen
dc.subjectMining Rock Mass Rating Systemen
dc.subjectIn-Situ Rock Mass Rating Systemen
dc.titleA quantitative correlation between the mining rock mass rating and in-situ rock mass rating classification systemsen
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
MSc _Eng_ Project Report.pdf
Size:
923.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
96 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections