Is Kripke right about statements of identity between names?

dc.contributor.authorHarris, Chadwin Mark
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-13T11:25:51Z
dc.date.available2009-03-13T11:25:51Z
dc.date.issued2009-03-13T11:25:51Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract In this report I critically evaluate Kripke’s rejection of the possibility of contingently true statements of identity between names. I extract his argument for this view from his book Naming and Necessity and his article “Identity and Necessity”. I discuss debates in the relevant literature about Kripke’s positions on naming, reference and modality, as these issues influence Kripke’s conclusions about statements of identity between names. I provide my own arguments for rejecting Kripke’s conclusions and accepting that there can be contingently true statements of identity between names.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10539/6732
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectKripkeen
dc.subjectIdentityen
dc.subjectNamingen
dc.subjectRigid designationen
dc.titleIs Kripke right about statements of identity between names?en
dc.typeThesisen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PDF- Abstract.pdf
Size:
11.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PDF- MA researchreport.pdf
Size:
216.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
96 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections