Johnson, Candice A2022-11-302022-11-302021https://hdl.handle.net/10539/33604A research report submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment for the degree of Masters in Medicine (Obstetrics & Gynaecology)Background: Informed consent is a regulatory and ethical requirement in medical practice. It forms the ethical basis of a patient-centered approach. In order to give informed consent, the user should be well informed and participate in the decision making. There is contention on whether women in labour can give a valid informed consent. Objectives: To evaluate the understanding and recollection of informed consent after emergency caesarean section. Methods: A cross-sectional study at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital between May and October 2016. English speaking women older than 18 years were invited to participate. Previous caesarean section, maternal or neonatal complications were exclusion criteria. Results: One hundred women were interviewed. The mean age was 26.5years (SD±5.76). All the women recalled the indication for the caesarean section and 90 understood this. Seventy-eight said that risks and complications were discussed, eights aid they were not, eleven could not remember and 3 did not know if they were discussed. When women were prompted, the recollection of the risks and complications was better. Seventy-four women wanted full disclosure of all the risks and complications.Eighty-four were satisfied with the information and 93 felt they took part in decision-making without being pressurised.enThesis