Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Archives of Women's Mental Health (2024) 27:201–218 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-023-01384-3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre‑ to post‑flood exposure in women residing in low‑income settings in South Africa J. Nöthling1 · A. Gibbs1,2,3,4 · L. Washington5 · S. G. Gigaba3 · S. Willan1,6 · N. Abrahams1,7 · R. Jewkes1,8 Received: 10 August 2023 / Accepted: 15 October 2023 / Published online: 22 November 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract Floods are increasing in frequency and may increase the risk for experiencing emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of damage, loss, injury and death resulting from floods that occurred in and around the city of Durban, South Africa, in April 2022, and associated changes in mental health pre- to post-floods in a low-income setting. Seventy-three women between the ages of 18 and 45, residing in flood affected, low-income settings, were interviewed prior to the floods occurring. Mental health measures were repeated with 69 of the 73 women during the post-flood interview along with a questionnaire measuring flood-related exposures. Loss of infrastructure (lacked access to drinking water, electricity, fresh food, could not travel to work, had to stay in a shelter and could not get hold of friends or family) was a predictor of post-flood change in levels of emotional distress and anxiety. Higher levels of prior trauma exposure were associated with higher post-flood levels of emotional distress. Higher pre-flood food insecurity was also associated with higher post-flood anxiety. Women affected by poverty, food insecurity and a history of trauma are vulnerable to the additive adverse mental health effects of floods. Proactive approaches to diminishing the impact of floods on the livelihood of women is needed and post-flood relieve efforts may be more affective if they are enhanced by providing mental health support. Keywords Floods · Emotional distress · Depression · Posttraumatic stress disorder · Anxiety Introduction Regional changes in the water cycle, as a result of climate change, has brought about an increase in natural disasters and in particular the frequency of flooding (Eccles et al. 2019; McClymont et al. 2020). According to the Emergency Event Database (EM-DAT) which records and stores information on disasters across the globe, floods accounted for 51.6% of natural disasters in 2021 (Guha-Sapir et al. 2021). In the same period, floods affected 29.2 million individuals and resulted in $74.4 billion in economic loss and 4143 lives lost (Guha- Sapir et al. 2021). In addition to the immediate health effects of floods (e.g. death and injury), floods may have indirect long-lasting health effects such as an increase in vector-borne diseases (e.g. malaria, Rift Valley fever and West Nile fever) and water-borne diseases (e.g. gastroenteritis, cholera, typhoid fever and dysentery) (Chowell et al. 2019; De Souza et al. 2015; Fahy et al. 2019; Suhr and Steinert 2022). The loss of cattle, crops and reduced soil quality following floods also has an impact on food security which may result in hunger * J. Nöthling jani.nothling@mrc.ac.za 1 Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Francie van Zijl DriveTygerberg, PO Box 19070, Cape Town 7505, South Africa 2 Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK 3 Centre for Rural Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa 4 Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK 5 Project Empower, Durban, South Africa 6 The School of Applied Human Sciences (Psychology), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa 7 School of Public Health and Family Medicine: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa 8 School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s00737-023-01384-3&domain=pdf 202 J. Nöthling et al. 1 3 and malnutrition (Codjoe and Owusu 2011; Hathaway and Maibach 2018; Opoku et al. 2021). Another indirect impact of floods includes emotional and psychological difficulties resulting from flood-related traumatic experiences (Fernandez et al. 2015). These traumatic experiences includes displacement, loss of life, loss of belongings as well as loss of community cohesion and support (Bandla et al. 2019; Fernandez et al. 2015). Flood-related trauma increases the risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression and anxiety (Cianconi et al. 2020). A study conducted in informal settlements in Kenya found that 80.8% of participants experienced an increase in psychological distress in the immediate aftermath of floods (Okaka and Odhiambo 2019). A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies (predominately studies from low- and middle- income countries—LMIC) on the development of PTSD following floods, reported a prevalence rate of 29.5% which is considerably higher than the estimated global prevalence of 3.9% (Golitaleb et al. 2022; Koenen et al. 2017). Depression and anxiety following flood exposure is less commonly studied, but the prevalence is expected to be high given that these conditions are highly comorbid with PTSD (Cianconi et al. 2020). The adverse psychological effects of floods are often correlated with the severity of the impact of floods e.g. more losses, damage, threat and harm experienced results in more psychological distress, and these effects are more pronounced in LMIC’s characterized by high levels of poverty and food insecurity (Bouchard et al. 2022; Frumkin et al. 2008; Opoku et al. 2021). The mental health effects of floods is further exacerbated by prior experiences of psychological symptoms and prior exposure to traumas (e.g. childhood trauma and gender-based violence) (Alderman et al. 2012; Cianconi et al. 2020; Fernandez et al. 2015; Stanke et al. 2012). Women, children, elderly and those with disabilities are often disproportionally affected by poverty and trauma which may place them at higher risk for adverse mental health outcomes following floods (Fahy et al. 2019; Gruebner et al. 2017; Hetherington et al. 2018; Veenema et al. 2017). The psychological effects of floods are generally less often reported than economic loss and injuries, especially in LMICs (Sohrabizadeh et al. 2016). This results in an incomplete picture of the need for health and mental health services in flood affected regions, which adversely affects resource allocation and service delivery planning (Bouchard et al. 2022; Elwenspoek et al. 2020; Fernandez et al. 2015). An opportunity to study the mental health impacts of floods was presented when severe flooding occurred between 8 and 12 April 2022 in the city of Durban and surroundings, located in the eThekwini municipality of South Africa (South African Weather Service 2022). Flooding in this region is not uncommon with some flood-related damage reported yearly and more severe flooding events, which includes loss of live, reported once or twice during a decade (Olanrewaju & Reddy, 2022). However, during the April 2022 floods record-breaking rainfall was recorded, with some areas reporting more than 300 mm of rain in 24 h (South African Weather Service 2022). The heavy rains, already saturated ground and inadequate draining systems brought about flash floods and landslides which resulted in more than 450 deaths, destruction of 8584 houses and severe damaged to 13,536 houses, 600 schools and 84 health care facilities (International Federation of the Red Cross 2022). Some of the damage was also a result of the overflowing of several rivers in the area (International Federation of the Red Cross 2022). Electricity, road and water infrastructure were severely damaged resulting in loss of electricity, access to drinking water, cellphone signal and food supplies, lasting for more than a week in the most severely affected areas (Bouchard et al. 2022; International Federation of the Red Cross 2022; South African Weather Service 2022). Collapsed roads and destroyed bridges delayed rescue operations and access to health care services (International Federation of the Red Cross 2022). The worst household flooding was reported before sunrise in the early hours of the morning of the 12th of April which, in addition to the electricity outages, complicated residential evacuation procedures (Bouchard et al. 2022). The total cost of infrastructure damaged caused by the floods is estimated to be around R25 billion (US$1.5 billion) and recovery operations and repairs are still in progress (International Federation of the Red Cross 2022). The natural landscape in the eThekwini municipal region is characterized by rolling hills, valleys and streams (Diop et al. 2010). Informal settlements in this region are growing in size due to regional migration and urbanization (Bouchard et al. 2022). Housing in informal settlements is built from a mixture of materials, with brick or concrete structures interspersed with less durable structures made from zinc- electroplated corrugated iron (known as ‘zinc’) sheets and (often reused) wood, the roof of which, at the best of times, often leak (International Federation of the Red Cross 2022). The informal settlements are commonly near rivers, below flood lines or at the foot of steep hills (Williams et al. 2019). High levels of poverty, unemployment and overcrowding, and inadequate access to drinking water, sanitation services, drainage, waste disposal and health services are also frequently reported (Bouchard et al. 2022; Cianconi et al. 2020; Hlahla et al. 2022). Deforestation and substandard housing development practices, coupled with the landscape characteristics and heavy rains, left the residents of these areas particularly vulnerable to the damage caused by the April floods (Williams et al. 2019). Landslides were widespread and resulted in injuries and death caused by colliding with debris, entrapment and suffocation (Diop et al. 2010). At the time of the floods, we had commenced interviews with a group of women from flood-affected areas. We adapted our 203Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre‑ to post‑flood exposure… 1 3 study, as described below, in order to investigate the impacts of the floods on their wellbeing. In this paper we consider three questions: first, what was the extent of damage, loss, injury and death related to the floods, reported by women living in flood-affected low-income settings? Second, what were the asso- ciations between flood impact (damage to belongings, loss of infrastructure and interpersonal impact) and pre- to post-flood symptoms of general emotional distress, depression, anxiety and PTSD in this group of women? Third, did experiences of childhood trauma, intimate partner violence (IPV), non-partner sexual violence (NPSV) and food insecurity have an impact on symptoms of emotional distress, depression, anxiety and PTSD pre- and post-floods? Methods Participants and setting The original aim of the broader study was to conduct one set of interviews with women to assess standard measures for future use in a randomised control trial called the Rape Impact Cohort Evaluation Study 2 (registered in the Pan African Clinical Trail Registry under PACTR202211795963218). In order to do this, 100 women between the ages of 18 and 45 were recruited (using convenience sampling)  from low-income settings (predominately informal settlements) in the eThekwini district through a local non-governmental organisation (NGO) Project Empower, that worked in these areas. These interviews were conducted between 29 March 2022 and 25 April 2022 with 100 women, however, prior to the occurrence of the floods on 8 April 2022, 73 of these women had been interviewed. The 73 women were invited to return to the study site to complete a follow-up questionnaire between 20 June 2022 and 13 July 2022 which was between two and three months after the floods occurred. Sixty-nine women returned and completed the follow-up questionnaire. Procedure The original study with the 100 participants was introduced as the ‘Women’s Health and Wellbeing Study’ and the procedures were briefly explained telephonically. Interested participants were invited to attend an information session at the site of the NGO’s offices where they also completed the informed consent procedures before enrolling in the study. Participants were informed that participation is voluntary and that they could withdraw from the study at any time. After explaining the study procedures and obtaining informed consent, participants were invited to complete the pre-flood assessments with a research assistant who was trained in ethical principles in research and working with vulnerable groups. The assessments were completed using a one-on-one interview format where the research assistant read each question to the participant and recorded the responses. An assessment lasted approximately one hour and consisted of a demographic questionnaire and self-report measures. Participants were offered a break if the research assistant noticed that they were becomming restless or fatigued. The subgroup of women who returned for the nested flood study (69) were reconsented and informed of the amended aim of the study which was to compare pre- and post-flood mental health outcomes. Self-report measures related to mental health outcomes were readministered along with a measure assessing the severity of exposure to flood-related damage, loss, injury and death. Women were referred to a local university’s trauma clinic (operated by trainee clinical and counselling psychologists) if they exhibited signs of distress or indicated a need for support or specialised care. All data gathered were deidentified by replacing identifiable information with a study number. Women were compensated for their time and travel expenses. Ethical approval to conduct the original and follow-up study was obtained from the South African Medical Research Council Ethics Committee (SAMRC; EC041-10/2021). Measures Demographic data were collected along with mental health data which included a general emotional distress, depression, anxiety and PTSD measure. Potential mental health covariates measured included food insecurity, childhood trauma, IPV and NPSV exposures. The impact of the floods was measured by inquiring about damage to belongings, loss of infrastructure and, interpersonal impact. The measures used are described in Table 1. Data analysis Data analysis was completed using SPSS version 27 and Stata version 17. Baseline demographic and psychological characteristics of women who completed the pre-and post- flood assessments were compared to women who only com- pleted the pre-flood assessment, to assess for selection bias, using chi-square and t-test statistics. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, percentages) were calculated for the demographic and psychosocial variables, flood-related damage to belongings, loss of infrastructure and interper- sonal impact. Change in PTSD, depression, anxiety and emotional distress scores from pre- to post-flood assessment were analysed using paired sample t-tests for continuous out- comes and McNemar’s exact tests for binary outcomes (cut- off scores). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between flood-related damage to belongings, loss of infrastructure, interpersonal impact and post-flood scores for emotional distress, depression, anxiety 204 J. Nöthling et al. 1 3 Ta bl e 1 D es cr ip tio n of m ea su re s a nd v ar ia bl es u se d in th e stu dy M ea su re D es cr ip tio n Ti m ep oi nt /s a dm in ist er ed a nd C ro nb ac h al ph a Va ria bl e/ s So ur ce o f m ea su re D em og ra ph ic q ue sti on na ire Si x ite m s w ith d iv er se re sp on se o pt io ns de pe nd in g on in di vi du al it em s Pr e- flo od (1 ) A ge , ( 2) e th ni ci ty , ( 3) e du ca tio n, (4 ) m ai n so ur ce o f i nc om e, (5 ) a m ou nt o f m on th ly in co m e K es sl er P sy ch ol og ic al D ist re ss S ca le (K 6) Si x ite m s m ea su rin g ps yc ho lo gi ca l di str es s r el at ed to d ep re ss io n an d an xi et y e. g. ‘d ur in g th e pa st 30  d ay s, ho w o fte n di d yo u fe el h op el es s? ’ Re sp on se o pt io ns w er e ad ju ste d fo r co ns ist en cy w ith o th er sc al es a nd w er e ra te d on a 4 -p oi nt L ik er t s ca le ra ng in g fro m 0 ‘n ot a t a ll’ to 4 ‘a lm os t a lw ay s’. To ta l s co re s r ag ed b et w ee n 0 an d 24 . H ig he r s co re s r ep re se nt ed h ig he r ps yc ho lo gi ca l d ist re ss . Pr e- (0 .8 4) an d po st- flo od (0 .8 9) Em ot io na l d ist re ss (K es sl er e t a l. 20 02 ) C en tre fo r E pi de m io lo gi c St ud ie s D ep re ss io n Sc al e (C ES -D ) Tw en ty it em s m ea su rin g sy m pt om s o f de pr es si on e .g . ‘ I f el t t ha t I c ou ld n ot sh ak e off th e bl ue s e ve n w ith h el p fro m m y fa m ily o r f rie nd s’. R es po ns es w er e re co rd ed o n a 4- po in t L ik er t s ca le ra ng in g fro m 0 ‘r ar el y or n on e of th e tim e’ to 3 ‘m os t o r a ll of th e tim e’ . T he to ta l s co re s r an ge d be tw ee n 0 an d 60 . H ig he r s co re s i nd ic at ed m or e se ve re sy m pt om s o f d ep re ss io n. A c ut -o ff sc or e of 2 1 or m or e w as c on si de re d in di ca tiv e of p os si bl e de pr es si on . Pr e- (0 .8 0) a nd p os t-fl oo d (0 .8 9) D ep re ss io n sy m pt om s a nd st at us (R ad lo ff 19 77 ) G en er al is ed A nx ie ty D is or de r 7 (G A D 7) Se ve n ite m s a ss es si ng sy m pt om s o f an xi et y e. g. ‘d ur in g th e pa st tw o w ee ks , h ow o fte n di d yo u ha ve tr ou bl e re la xi ng ?’ . R es po ns es w er e re co rd ed on a 4 -p oi nt L ik er t s ca le ra ng in g fro m 0 ‘n ot a t a ll’ to 3 ‘n ea rly e ve ry d ay ’. To ta l s co re s r an ge d be tw ee n 0 an d 21 . H ig he r s co re s r ep re se nt ed h ig he r an xi et y le ve ls . A c ut -o ff of 1 0 in di ca te d m od er at e an xi et y. Pr e- (0 .8 5) a nd p os t-fl oo d (0 .8 8) A nx ie ty sy m pt om s a nd st at us (S pi tz er e t a l. 20 06 ) 205Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre‑ to post‑flood exposure… 1 3 Ta bl e 1 (c on tin ue d) M ea su re D es cr ip tio n Ti m ep oi nt /s a dm in ist er ed a nd C ro nb ac h al ph a Va ria bl e/ s So ur ce o f m ea su re H ar va rd T ra um a Q ue sti on na ire (H TQ ) Si xt ee n ite m s m ea su rin g D SM -I V sy m pt om s o f P TS D e xp er ie nc ed in th e pa st w ee k e. g. ‘n ig ht m ar es a bo ut th e ev en t k ee p co m in g ba ck ’. Re sp on se s w er e re co rd ed o n a 4- po in t L ik er t s ca le ra ng in g fro m 1 ‘n ev er ’ t o 4 ‘o fte n’ . To ta l s co re s r an ge d be tw ee n 16 a nd 6 4. H ig he r s co re s i nd ic at ed m or e se ve re PT SD sy m pt om s. A c ut -o ff sc or e w as ca lc ul at ed b y di vi di ng th e to ta l s co re b y 16 , w ith th os e sc or in g ab ov e 2. 5 be in g co ns id er ed a s p os si bl e PT SD c as es . Pr e- (0 .9 1) a nd p os t-fl oo d (0 .9 2) PT SD sy m pt om se ve rit y an d st at us (M ol lic a et  a l. 19 92 ) H ou se ho ld H un ge r S ca le (H H S) Th re e ite m s e nq ui re d ab ou t t he fr eq ue nc y of la ck o f f oo d in th e ho us eh ol d, g oi ng to sl ee p hu ng ry a nd g oi ng a w ho le d ay w ith ou t e at in g du e to a la ck o f f oo d. Re sp on se s w er e re co rd ed o n a 4- po in t Li ke rt sc al e ra ng in g fro m 1 ‘n ev er ’ t o 3 ‘o fte n’ . T ot al sc or es ra ng ed b et w ee n 3 an d 12 . H ig he r s co re s i nd ic at ed m or e se ve re h un ge r. Pr e- flo od (0 .8 5) Fo od in se cu rit y (D ei tc hl er e t a l. 20 10 ) C hi ld ho od T ra um a Q ue sti on na ire – S ho rt Fo rm (C TQ -S F) A m od ifi ed v er si on o f t he C TQ -S F w as us ed to m ea su re e xp os ur e to n eg le ct , em ot io na l a bu se , p hy si ca l a bu se a nd se xu al a bu se b ef or e th e ag e of 1 8. T he m ea su re c on si ste d of fo ur te en it em s e. g. ‘I w as b ea te n so h ar d at h om e th at it le ft a m ar k or b ru is e’ w ith re sp on se s m ea su re d on a 4 -p oi nt L ik er t s ca le . Fo r e ac h ite m p ar tic ip an ts w er e as ke d to in di ca te if th e tra um a oc cu rr ed 1 ‘n ev er ’, 2 ‘r ar el y’ , 3 ‘s om et im es ’ o r 4 ‘o fte n’ . T ot al sc or es ra ng ed b et w ee n 14 an d 56 w ith h ig he r s co re s i nd ic at in g m or e se ve re e xp os ur e. R es po nd in g ‘r ar el y’ , ‘ so m et im es ’ o r ‘ of te n’ to a ny of o ne th e ite m s m ea su rin g ne gl ec t, em ot io na l a bu se , s ex ua l a bu se o r ph ys ic al a bu se , r es pe ct iv el y, w as co ns id er ed in di ca tiv e of th e pr es en ce o f th es e ty pe s o f c hi ld ho od tr au m a. Pr e- flo od (0 .6 8) C hi ld ho od n eg le ct , e m ot io na l a bu se , se xu al a bu se a nd p hy si ca l a bu se (B er ns te in e t a l. 20 03 ) 206 J. Nöthling et al. 1 3 Ta bl e 1 (c on tin ue d) M ea su re D es cr ip tio n Ti m ep oi nt /s a dm in ist er ed a nd C ro nb ac h al ph a Va ria bl e/ s So ur ce o f m ea su re In tim at e Pa rtn er V io le nc e (I PV ) a nd N on -P ar tn er S ex ua l V io le nc e (N PS V ) IP V w as m ea su re d us in g fiv e ite m s en qu iri ng a bo ut p hy si ca l I PV e .g . ‘ in th e pa st 6  m on th s, ho w m an y tim es ha s y ou r c ur re nt o r p re vi ou s h us ba nd or b oy fr ie nd k ic ke d, d ra gg ed , b ea te n, ch ok ed o r b ur nt y ou ? an d th re e ite m s en qu iri ng a bo ut se xu al IP V e .g . ‘ in th e pa st 6  m on th s, ho w m an y tim es ha s y ou r c ur re nt o r p re vi ou s h us ba nd or b oy fr ie nd p hy si ca lly fo rc ed y ou to h av e se x w he n yo u di d no t w an t to ?’ . N PS V w as m ea su re d us in g fo ur ite m s e nq ui rin g ab ou t p as t e xp er ie nc es of n on -p ar tn er ra pe e .g . ‘ in th e pa st 6  m on th s, ho w m an y tim es h av e yo u be en fo rc ed o r p er su ad ed to h av e se x ag ai ns t y ou r w ill b y a m an w ho w as n’ t yo ur h us ba nd o r b oy fr ie nd ?’ . R es po ns e op tio ns in cl ud ed 1 ‘n ev er ’, 2 ‘o nc e’ , 3 ‘a fe w ti m es ’ a nd 4 ‘m an y tim es ’. Re sp on di ng ‘o nc e’ , ‘ a fe w ti m es ’ o r ‘m an y tim es ’ t o an y on e of th e ite m s m ea su rin g ph ys ic al IP V, se xu al IP V an d N PS V, re sp ec tiv el y, w as c on si de re d in di ca tiv e of th e pr es en ce o f t he se ty pe s of v io le nc e in th e pa st 6  m on th s. Pr e- flo od (n om in al m ea su re ) Ph ys ic al IP V, se xu al IP V a nd N PS V (G ar cí a- M or en o et  a l. 20 06 ) C om po si te T ra um a Lo ad S co re A c om po si te tr au m a sc or e w as c al cu la te d by a ss ig ni ng a sc or e of 1 to e ac h tra um a ty pe if p re se nt o r 0 if n ot p re se nt . Th e tra um a ty pe s i nc lu de d ch ild ho od ne gl ec t, ch ild ho od e m ot io na l a bu se , ch ild ho od se xu al a bu se , c hi ld ho od ph ys ic al a bu se , p hy si ca l I PV , s ex ua l IP V a nd N PS V. T he c om po si te sc or e re pr es en te d th e nu m be r o f d iff er en t tra um a ty pe s a p ar tic ip an t w as e xp os ed to . S co re s r an ge d be tw ee n 0 an d 7. Pr e- flo od (o rd in al m ea su re ) Tr au m a ex po su re 207Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre‑ to post‑flood exposure… 1 3 Ta bl e 1 (c on tin ue d) M ea su re D es cr ip tio n Ti m ep oi nt /s a dm in ist er ed a nd C ro nb ac h al ph a Va ria bl e/ s So ur ce o f m ea su re Fl oo d Im pa ct Q ue sti on na ire Fo ur it em s m ea su re d da m ag e to be lo ng in gs (f ur ni tu re , e le ct ric al ap pl ia nc es , c el l p ho ne o r c om pu te r, ho us e str uc tu re ) w ith re sp on se s m ea su re d on a 3 -p oi nt L ik er t s ca le w ith re sp on se o pt io ns 0 ‘n o da m ag e’ , 1 ‘s om e th in gs w er e da m ag ed ’ a nd 2 ‘e ve ry th in g w as d es tro ye d or lo st’ . S ix ite m s m ea su re d  lo ss o f i nf ra str uc tu re (la ck ed a cc es s t o dr in ki ng w at er , el ec tri ci ty , f re sh fo od , t ra ve l t o w or k, ha d to st ay in a sh el te r a nd c ou ld n ot ge t h ol d of o th er s) . R es po ns es w er e m ea su re d on a 4 -p oi nt L ik er t s ca le w ith re sp on se o pt io ns 0 ‘n ot tr ue a t al l’, 1 ‘f or 1 to 7  d ay s’, 2 ‘f or 8 to 14  d ay s’ a nd 3 ‘m or e th an 1 5  da ys ’. Si x ite m s m ea su re d in te rp er so na l im pa ct (s ig ni fic an t o th er st ill m is si ng , si gn ifi ca nt o th er p as se d aw ay , si gn ifi ca nt o th er w as in ju re d, w itn es se d so m eo ne p as si ng aw ay , w itn es se d so m eo ne g et tin g in ju re d, h ad to ta ke ca re o f s om eo ne w ho lo st th ei r h om e) . Re sp on se s w er e m ea su re d on a 3 -p oi nt Li ke rt sc al e w ith re sp on se o pt io ns 0 ‘n o’ , 1 ‘y es , 1 p er so n’ , 2 ‘y es , m or e th an 1 p er so n’ . T he it em s w er e ne w ly de ve lo pe d, b as ed o n th e lit er at ur e re po rti ng th e ex pe rie nc es a nd im pa ct o f th e A pr il 20 22 fl oo ds o n th e eT he kw in i po pu la tio n (B ou ch ar d et  a l., 2 02 2; In te rn at io na l F ed er at io n of th e Re d C ro ss 2 02 2) . H ig he r s co re s i nd ic at ed be in g m or e se ve re ly im pa ct ed b y th e flo od s. Po st- flo od (0 .6 4- 0. 77 ) Eff ec t o f fl oo ds o n th e in di vi du al s, ca te go ris ed a s d am ag e to be lo ng in gs , l os s o f i nf ra str uc tu re a nd in te rp er so na l i m pa ct 208 J. Nöthling et al. 1 3 and PTSD. A composite pre-flood trauma score (childhood trauma, IPV and NPSV experiences), food insecurity scores and pre- and post-flood scores for emotional distress, depres- sion, anxiety and PTSD was also investigated using Pear- son’s correlation coefficients. Four linear regression models were used to assess whether there was an independent association between the impact of damage to belongings, loss of infrastructure and interpersonal impact on post-flood levels of emotional distress (model 1, controlling for baseline emotional distress and age), depression (model 2, controlling for baseline depression and age), anxiety (model 3, controlling for baseline anxiety and age) and PTSD (model 4, controlling for baseline PTSD and age). Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to assess the relationships between the flood-related variables that were significantly associated with the mental health outcomes in the regression models. We also included pre-flood prior trauma and food insecurity in the SEM models as covariates. Associations were tested using the maximum likelihood method. Goodness of fit was assess using a comparative fit index (CFI) of > 0.950, a Tucker-Lewis index of > 0.950 and a root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) of < 0.050. Results Baseline demographic, food insecurity and prior trauma characteristics of the sample There were no significant differences in baseline psycho- social characteristics between women who completed the pre-flood assessment and those who completed the pre- and post-f lood assessment (see supplementary Table 1). Table 2 present the baseline socio-demographic characteristics of the sample. The mean age of partici- pants was 26.3 years. All participants completed some form of education with 58% indicating completion of pri- mary education, 40.6% indicating completion of second- ary education and 1.4% indicating completion of tertiary education. The majority of participants were unemployed with 71% relying on social grants as a primary source of income. None of the participants indicated that they had no money available for expenses per month, 42% indicated that they had between R1 and R500 ($0 – $31) available followed by 30.6% who had between R501 and R1000 ($31 – $61) available, 13% who had between R1001 and R2000 ($61—$122) available and 2.9% ($122) had more than R2001 available. The mean score for food insecurity was 4.6 (range 3–12). The mean composite childhood, IPV and NPSV pre-flood trauma load score was 2.9 (range 0–7) with the most prominent trauma being childhood physical abuse with a prevalence of 69.6%, followed by 55.1% for childhood neglect, 52.2% for childhood emotional abuse, 34.8% for physical IPV, 34.8% for sexual IPV, 29% for childhood sexual abuse and 14.5% for sexual NPSV. Pre‑ and post‑flood mental health characteristics of the sample Table 3 presents the pre- and post-flood mental health symptom scores of the participants. There were no significant differences in pre- to post-flood scores for emotional distress (p = 0.247), anxiety (p = 0.686) and PTSD (p = 0.138). There was a significant decline in pre- (M = 23.9, SD = 12.4) to post-flood (M = 20.3, SD = 12.2) depression scores (p = 0.036). When considering pre- and post-flood cut-off scores, the difference between depression groups and anxiety groups was not significant. There was a significant difference between PTSD groups (p = 0.049), with 19.1% of participants scor- ing above cut-off pre- and post-floods, 55.9% scoring below cut-off pre- and post-floods, 19.1% scoring below cut-off pre- floods and above cut-off post-flood, and 5.9% scoring above cut-off pre-floods and below cut-off post-floods. Damage, loss, and interpersonal impact of the floods Flood-related characteristics are presented in Table 4. More than half of the sample reported some damage to furniture (53.6%) and some structural damage to their homes (65.7%), less reported damage to electrical appliances (26.1%) and dam- age to phones or computers (11.6%).The most common category endorsed for destroyed items was electronic appliances (10.1%) followed by housing structures (7.5%) and furniture (5.8%). In the wake of the floods, the majority of participants (86.9%) lacked access to drinking water and electricity (75.4%) for at least 1 to 7 days while 46.3% did not have access to fresh food, 17.3% could not travel and lost income, 11.5% had to stay in a shelter and 20.2% could not get hold a family member for at least 1 to 7 days. The death of a significant other (family member, friend or someone they cared about) was reported by 15.9% of participants, 21.7% reported an injury of a significant other, 2.8% reported a significant other still being missing and 15.9% reporting having to care for a significant other who lost their home. Witnessing injury caused by the floods was reported by 15.9% of participants and 5.8% witnessed a death. Relationship between flood‑related trauma and post‑flood mental health outcomes The findings from the mental health correlation analyses are presented in Table 5. Damage to belongings was correlated with post-flood emotional distress (r = 0.238, p < 0.05). Loss of infrastructure was correlated with post-flood emotional 209Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre‑ to post‑flood exposure… 1 3 distress (r = 0.339, p < 0.001) and post-flood anxiety (r = 0.321, p < 0.001). Interpersonal impact of floods was not correlated with any post-flood mental health outcomes. The findings from the regression analyses are presented in Table 6. The regression models were adjusted for baseline age and the baseline mental health measure corresponding with the post-flood mental health measure included in each model. The Table 2 Demographic, food insecurity, trauma and mental health characteristics of the sample 1. Student bursary funding provided by the South African National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) 2. Based on the average United States Dollar ($) to South African Rand (ZAR) exchange rate of $1 to R16.4 in 2022 HHS Household Hunger scale; CTQ Childhood trauma scale; IPV Intimate partner violence; NPV Non- partner violence; K6 Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; CES-D Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; GAD7 Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7; PTSD Posttraumatic stress disorder; HTQ Harvard Trauma Questionnaire n (%) M (SD) Range Age 69 (100) 26.3 (5.7) 18–44 Level of education completed 69 (100)   No formal education 0 (0.0)   Primary education 40 (58)   Secondary education 28 (40.6)   Tertiary education 1 (1.4) Main source of income 69 (100)   No income 1 (1.4)   Employment 9 (13.)   Social grant 49 (71)   Family support 8 (11.6)   Partner support 5 (7.2)    Other1 1 (1.4) Amount of money available to spend per month2 68 (100)   None 0 (0.0)   R1 – R500 ($0 – $31) 29 (42)   R501 – R1000 ($31 – $61) 28 (30.6)   R1001 – R2000 ($61—$122) 9 (13)   > R2001 (> $122) 2 (2.9) Household Hunger Scale (HHS) score 69 (100) 4.6 (2.2) 3–12 Childhood Trauma Scale (CTQ) score 69 (100) 22.2 (6.5) 14–40   Experienced childhood neglect 38 (55.1)   Experienced childhood emotional abuse 36 (52.2)   Experienced childhood physical abuse 48 (69.6)   Experienced childhood sexual abuse 20 (29.0) Intimate partner violence (IPV) 69 (100)   Experienced physical IPV 24 (34.8)   Experienced sexual IPV 24 (34.8) Non-partner violence (NPV) 69 (100)   Experienced sexual NPV 10 (14.5) Composite pre-flood trauma load score 69 (100) 2.9 (1.7) 0–7 Emotional distress (K6) pre-flood 67 (100) 15.9(5.4) 6–24 Emotional distress (K6) post-flood 69 (100) 15.1(5.4) 6–24 Depression (CESD) pre-flood 66 (100) 23.9(12.4) 3–51 Depression (CESD) post-flood 68 (100) 20.3(12.2) 0–44 Anxiety (GAD7) pre-flood 69 (100) 8.4(5.2) 0–21 Anxiety (GAD7) post-flood 69 (100) 8.7(5.4) 0–21 PTSD (HTQ) pre-flood 68 (100) 32.9(13.1) 16–63 PTSD (HTQ) post-flood 69 (100) 35.2(12.4) 16–60 210 J. Nöthling et al. 1 3 models estimating the effect of damage to belongings, loss of infrastructure and interpersonal impact of the floods on depres- sion and PTSD were not significant. The models estimating the effect of damage to belongings and interpersonal impact of the floods on emotional distress and anxiety were also not significant. Loss of infrastructure related to the floods was sig- nificantly associated with emotional distress ß = 0.37, t = 2.10, p = 0.040 and anxiety ß = 0.40, t = 2.11, p = 0.039. Relationship between food insecurity, prior trauma and pre‑ and post‑flood mental health outcomes The findings from the food security and prior trauma correlation analyses are presented in Table 7. Food insecurity was corre- lated with pre- (r = 0.339, p < 0.001) and post-flood (r = 0.356, p < 0.001) emotional distress, pre- (r = 0.451, p < 0.001) and post-flood (r = 0.329, p < 0.001) anxiety, pre- (r = 0.482, p < 0.001) and post-flood (r = 0.269, p < 0.05) depression, and pre-flood (r = 0.321, p < 0.001) PTSD. The composite pre-flood trauma score was correlated with pre- (r = 0.331, p < 0.001) and post-flood (r = 0.302, p < 0.001) emotional distress, pre- (r = 0.313, p < 0.05) and post-flood (r = 0.349, p < 0.001) anxi- ety, pre-flood depression (r = 0.262, p < 0.05) and pre- (r = 0.409, p < 0.001) and post-flood (r = 0.291, p < 0.001) PTSD. Pathways to post‑flood emotional distress The results for the structural equation model pathways to post- flood emotional distress is presented in Fig. 1 and Table 8. There was a direct path from pre-flood trauma (ß = 0.88, p = 0.014) and pre-flood food insecurity (ß = 0.71, p = 0.012) to pre-flood emotional distress. Increased pre-flood trauma and food insecurity was associated with increased pre-flood emotional distress. There was also a direct path from pre-flood emotional distress to post-flood emotional distress (ß = 0.42, p < 0.000) with higher pre-flood emotional distress predicting higher post-flood emotional distress. The association between increased loss of imfrastructure and increased post-flood emo- tional distress showed a trend towards significance (ß = 0.31, p = 0.060). There was an indirect path from pre-flood trauma to post-flood emotional distress (ß = 0.37, p = 0.037) and from pre-flood food insecurity to post-flood emotional distress (ß = 0.30, p = 0.034), with the direction of effect indicating that when mediated by increased pre-flood emotional distress, higher levels of pre-flood trauma and pre-flood food insecurity was likely to result in increased post-flood emotional distress. Pathways to post‑flood anxiety The results for the structural equation model pathways to post- flood anxiety are presented in Fig. 2 and Table 9. There was a direct path from pre-flood trauma (ß = 0.70, p = 0.032) and pre-flood food insecurity (ß = 0.97, p < 0.000) to pre-flood anxiety. Increased pre-flood trauma and food insecurity were associated with higher pre-flood anxiety levels. The associa- tion between pre-flood trauma and post-flood anxiety showed a trend towards significance (ß = 0.65, p = 0.056). Higher pre- flood anxiety was associated with higher post-flood anxiety (ß = 0.29, p = 0.020) and the association between the higher score for loss of infrastructure and increased post-flood anxi- ety showed a trend towards significance (ß = 0.13, p = 0.064). There was an indirect path from pre-flood food insecurity to post-flood anxiety, with the direction of effect indicating that when mediated by increased pre-flood anxiety, higher levels of pre-flood food insecurity were likely to result in increased post-flood anxiety (ß = 0.28, p = 0.047). Table 3 Change in cut-off scores for depression, anxiety and PTSD PTSD Posttraumatic stress disorder *p < 0.05 Depression post-flood p Above cut-off n (%) Below cut-off n (%) 0.648 Depression pre-flood Above cut-off n (%) 27 (41.5) 8 (12.3) Below cut-off n (%) 11 (16.9) 19 (29.2) Total n (%) 38 (58.5) 27 (41.5) Anxiety post-flood p Above cut-off n (%) Below cut-off n (%) 0.189 Anxiety pre-flood Above cut-off n(%) 16 (23.2) 7 (10.1) Below cut-off n(%) 14 (20.3) 32 (46.4) Total n (%) 30 (43.5) 39 (56.5) PTSD post-flood p Above cut-off n (%) Below cut-off n (%) 0.049* PTSD pre-flood Above cut-off n (%) 13 (19.1) 4 (5.9) Below cut-off n (%) 13 (19.1) 38 (55.9) Total n (%) 26 (38.2) 42 (61.8) 211Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre‑ to post‑flood exposure… 1 3 Discussion The findings of the study illustrate that the majority of women were affected by the floods with more than half reporting some damage to furniture, some damage to house structures, and lacking access to drinking water and electric- ity, for at least one to seven days. Nearly half also reported lacking access to fresh food for at least one to seven days. Witnessing death, knowing someone who passed away and knowing someone who was still missing due to the floods was reported by 25% of participants and 12% reported being uprooted and having to stay in a shelter. The high level of damage, loss and interpersonal impact is indicative of the severity of the floods experienced in April 2022 and its far- reaching effect on the livelihood of women living in low- income settings. The mean pre- to post-flood scores for emotional distress, anxiety and PTSD remained relatively stable although 20.3% Table 4 Frequency and type of damage, loss resulting from the floods Not at all Some things were damaged Everything was destroyed or lost M(SD) Range n (%) n (%) n (%) Damage to belongings 2.01 (1.69) 0–6   Damage to furniture 28 (40.6) 37 (53.6) 4 (5.8) 0.65 (0.59) 0–2   Damage to electrical appliances 44 (63.8) 18 (26.1) 7 (10.1) 0.46 (0.68) 0–2   Damage to cell phone or computer 61 (88.4) 8 (11.6) 0 (0.0) 0.12 (0.32) 0–1   Damage to house structure 18 (26.9) 44 (65.7) 5 (7.5) 0.81 (0.56) 0–2 Not true at all Yes, for 1–7 days Yes, for 8–14 days Yes, for more than 15 days n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) Loss of infrastructure 4.13 (3.20) 0–14    Did not have access to drinking water 9 (13.0) 33 (47.8) 12 (17.4) 15 (21.7) 1.48 (0.98) 0–3   Did not have access to electricity 17 (24.6) 30 (43.5) 12 (17.4) 10 (14.5) 1.22 (0.98) 0–3   Did not haveed access to fresh food 37 (53.6) 21 (30.4) 7 (10.1) 4 (5.8) 0.68 (0.88) 0–3   Could not travel to work and lost income 57 (82.6) 9 (13.0) 3 (4.3) 0 (0.0) 0.26 (0.68) 0–3   Did not have access to my home and had to stay in a shelter 61 (88.4) 5 (7.2) 1 (1.4) 2 (2.9) 0.19 (0.60) 0–3   Did not have cell phone reception and could not get hold of significant others 55 (79.7) 10 (14.5) 1 (1.4) 3 (4.3) 0.30 (0.71) 0–3 No Yes, 1 person Yes, more than 1 person n (%) n (%) n (%) Interpersonal impact 1.57 (2.40) 0–9   Significant other still missing 67 (97.1) 1 (1.4) 1 (1.4) 0.01 (0.12) 0–1   Significant other passed away 58 (84.1) 4 (5.8) 7 (10.1) 0.26 (0.63) 0–2   Significant other was physically injured 54 (78.3) 7 (10.1) 8 (11.6) 0.33 (0.68) 0–2   Witnessed someone getting injured 58 (84.1) 7 (10.1) 4 (5.8) 0.22 (0.54) 0–2   Witnessed someone pass away 65 (94.2) 4 (5.8) 0 (0.0) 0.12 (0.47) 0–2   I had to take care of a significant other who lost their home 58 (84.1) 5 (7.2) 6 (8.7) 0.25 (0.60) 0–2 212 J. Nöthling et al. 1 3 Table 6 Parameters for multiple regression models predicting mental health outcomes  PTSD Posttraumatic stress disorder *p < 0.05 ß std. error Std. ß t p 95 CI Lower Upper Emotional distress (model 1, n = 67)   Damage to belongings 0.48 0.34 0.15 1.41 0.164 −0.20 1.15   Loss of infrastructure 0.37 0.17 0.22 2.10 0.040* 0.30 0.73   Interpersonal impact 0.02 0.24 0.01 0.08 0.938 −0.47 0.50 Depression (model 2, n = 65)   Damage to belongings 0.24 0.85 0.03 0.28 0.779 −1.46 1.94   Loss of infrastructure 0.55 0.43 0.15 1.30 0.198 −0.30 1.40   Interpersonal  impact 0.34 0.59 0.07 0.57 0.568 −0.84 1.51 Anxiety (model 3, 69)   Damage to belongings 0.33 0.35 0.11 0.95 0.346 −0.37 1.04   Loss of infratructure 0.40 0.18 0.23 2.11 0.039* 0.020 0.76   Interpersonal impact 0.37 0.25 0.16 1.48 0.144 −0.13 0.87 PTSD (model 4, n = 68)   Damage to belongings 1.13 0.72 0.15 1.56 0.124 −0.32 2.57   Loss of infrastructure 0.04 0.39 0.01 0.10 0.919 −0.74 0.82   Interpersonal impact −0.22 0.53 −0.04 −0.41 0.682 −1.28 0.85 Table 7 Correlation coefficients representing the relationship between food insecurity, prior trauma and mental health outcomes PTSD Posttraumatic stress disorder *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1. Food insecurity 1 2. Prior trauma 0.209 1 3. Emotional distress pre-flood 0.336** 0.331** 1 4. Emotional distress post-flood 0.356** 0.302* 0.553** 1 5. Anxiety pre-flood 0.451** 0.313** 0.689** 0.538** 1 6. Anxiety post-flood 0.329** 0.349** 0.373** 0.718** 0.434** 1 7. Depression pre-flood 0.482** 0.262* 0.616** 0.534** 0.612** 0.315* 1 8. Depression post-flood 0.269* 0.207 0.358** 0.612** 0.296* 0.614** 0.398** 1 9. PTSD pre-flood 0.321** 0.409** 0.625** 0.521** 0.607** 0.285* 0.689** 0.356** 1 10. PTSD post-flood 0.179 0.291* 0.472** 0.649** 0.376** 0.519** 0.426** 0.592** 0.591** 1 Table 5 Correlation coefficients representing the relationship between impact trauma and pre- and post-flood mental health outcomes PTSD Posttraumatic stress disorder *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1. Damage to belongings 1 2. Loss of infrastructure 0.569** 1 3. Interpersonal impact 0.208 0.352** 1 4. Emotional distress post-flood 0.238* 0.339** 0.089 1 5. Anxiety post-flood 0.156 0.321** 0.224 0.718** 1 6. Depression post-flood 0.054 0.199 0.041 0.612** 0.614** 1 7. PTSD post-flood 0.189 0.088 0.055 0.649** 0.5819** 0.592** 1 213Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre‑ to post‑flood exposure… 1 3 and 19.1% of participants who previously scored below the clinical cut-off for anxiety and PTSD pre-floods, scored above the clinical cut-off post-floods, respectively. There was a decline in pre- to post-flood depression scores, but 16.9% of participants who scored below the clinical cut- off pre-flood scored above the cut-off post-floods. The pre- and post-flood cumulative prevalence for anxiety was 43.5%, 38.2% for PTSD and 58.5% for depression. Studies reporting on the mental health effects of floods generally report post-flood prevalence rates with few having a base- line pre-flood exposure measure (Cianconi et al. 2020). A retrospective study conducted in a flood prone informal set- tlement in Kenya found that 80.8% of participants affected by floods experienced an increased in emotional distress in the immediate aftermath of floods (Okaka and Odhiambo 2019). A study conducted one-year post flooding in England found a significantly higher percentage of anxiety (39% vs 6.5%), PTSD (51.4% vs 7.9%) and depression (29.7% vs 5.8%) in participants who were flood affected vs unaffected (Waite et al. 2017). Participants who had to seek shelter as a result of the flooding were 6–7 times more likely to expe- rience emotional distress (Waite et al. 2017). The slightly higher prevalence rates reported in this study is likely due to the effect of time, since participants were interviewed 2–3 months post-flooding rather than 1-year post-flooding (Fernandez et al. 2015). Damage to belongings (furniture, electric appliances, cell phones/computers, house structure) and  interper- sonal impact (significant other was injured, still missing or passed away, witnessed someone getting injured or passing away, had to take care of someone who lost their home) were not associated with mental health outcomes. Loss of infrastructure (lack of access to drinking water, electricity, fresh food, transport, cell phone signal and housing) was a predictor of post-flood emotional distress and anxiety while taking into account pre-flood emotional distress and anxiety scores. This finding is in line with prior findings indicat- ing that those who are directly and more severely affected by floods are at higher risk of experiencing psychologi- cal distress compared to those who are indirectly affected (Bouchard et al. 2022; Waite et al. 2017). The short- to medium-term recovery from floods is generally charac- terized by a busy period of regaining access to primary needs e.g. rebuilding damaged property and infrastructure and seeking shelter, food and drinking water which likely explains why those who were more severely affected by the loss of infrastructure were experiencing higher levels of distress and anxiety (Bouchard et al. 2022). Mental health effects and recovery from flood-related trauma, and possibly those related to interpersonal impact (injury and death), is likely to occur in the longer-term and to result in psychologi- cal disorders such as depression and PTSD (Bouchard et al. 2022; Waite et al., 2017). Flood-related development of psy- chological disorders may develop at a later point in recov- ery e.g. some studies report that symptoms of PTSD peak around a year post-floods when seasonal changes results in heavy rainfall again (Assanangkornchai et al. 2006; Cianconi et al. 2020; Fernandez et al. 2015). A composite score of pre-flood prior experiences of child- hood trauma, IPV and NPSV was associated with pre-flood emotional distress and anxiety. Women reporting higher pre- flood trauma and higher pre-flood emotional distress were also more likely to report higher post-flood levels of emo- tional distress. It is likely that the floods exacerbated anxiety Fig. 1 Pathways to post-flood emotional distress Note: Emotional distress is abbreviated to distress, *p<0.05, **p <0.001 214 J. Nöthling et al. 1 3 Ta bl e 8 L os s o f i nf ra str uc tu re a nd e qu at io n- le ve l g oo dn es s o f fi t f or th e em ot io na l d ist re ss S EM m od el * p  < .0 5, * *p  < .0 01 U ns ta nd ar di se d St an da rd is ed B SE z p C IL C IU B SE z p C IL C IU Pa th s   P re -fl oo d tra um a → P re -fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 0. 88 0. 36 2. 46 0. 01 4* 0. 18 1. 58 0. 28 0. 11 2. 6 0. 01 1* 0. 06 0. 49   P re -fl oo d fo od in se cu rit y → P re -fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 0. 71 0. 28 2. 51 0. 01 2* 0. 16 1. 26 0. 28 0. 11 2. 61 0. 00 9* * 0. 07 0. 49   P re -fl oo d tra um a → P os t-fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 0. 33 0. 33 1. 01 0. 31 4 − 0. 31 0. 97 0. 10 0. 10 1. 01 0. 31 3 − 0. 10 0. 31   P re -fl oo d fo od in se cu rit y → P os t-fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 0. 39 0. 26 1. 50 0. 13 2 − 0. 12 0. 90 0. 16 0. 10 1. 51 0. 13 2 − 0. 05 0. 36   P re -fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss → P os t-fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 0. 42 0. 11 3. 92 < 0. 00 1* * 0. 21 0. 63 0. 42 0. 10 4. 23 < 0. 00 1* * 0. 23 0. 62   P re -fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss → L os s o f i nf ra str uc tu re 0. 14 0. 07 2. 02 0. 04 4* 0. 00 0. 28 0. 24 0. 12 2. 08 0. 03 8* 0. 01 0. 46   L os s o f i nf ra str uc tu re → P os t-fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 0. 31 0. 17 1. 88 0. 06 0 − 0. 01 4 0. 64 0. 19 0. 10 1. 89 0. 05 9 − 0. 01 0. 39 Va ria nc es   P re -fl oo d tra um a 2. 86 0. 49 2. 04 4. 02 1 0 1 1   P re -fl oo d fo od in se cu rit y 4. 65 0. 80 3. 31 6. 52 1 0 1 1   P re -fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 23 .6 2 4. 08 16 .8 4 33 .1 4 0. 81 0. 09 0. 66 1. 00   L os s o f i nf ra str uc tu re   9. 80 1. 69 6. 99 13 .7 5 0. 94 0. 06 0. 84 1. 06   P os t-fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 17 .8 0 3. 07 12 .6 8 24 .9 7 0. 62 0. 09 0. 47 0. 83   E qu at io n- le ve l g oo dn es s o f fi t R2   P re -fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 0. 19   P os t-fl oo d em ot io na l d ist re ss 0. 38   L os s o f i nf ra str uc tu re   0. 06 215Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre‑ to post‑flood exposure… 1 3 symptoms in women who were already experiencing high levels of anxiety prior to the floods, as has been observed in other studies investigating flood-exposed communities in LMIC (Bhamani et al. 2012; Fernandez et al. 2015; Stanke et al. 2012). Prior experiences of trauma, especially those occurring during childhood may result in long-term changes in biological and psycho-social response to stress which may leave an individual vulnerable to adverse mental outcomes when trauma is compounded with additional events such as flooding (Zarse et al. 2019). Higher levels of pre-flood food insecurity were correlated with higher levels of pre-flood emotional distress and anxiety. Women reporting higher pre-flood food insecurity were also more likely to report higher post-flood anxiety. Fig. 2 Pathways to post-flood anxiety. Note: Loss of infra- structure was shortened to lost infrastructure Note: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001 Table 9 Loss of infrastructures and equation-level goodness of fit for the anxiety SEM model * p < .05, **p < .001 Unstandardised Standardised B SE z P CIL CIU B SE z p CIL CIU Paths   Pre-flood trauma → Pre-flood anxiety 0.0.70 0.32 2.14 0.032* 0.06 1.33 0.23 0.10 2.19 0.029 0.02 0.43   Pre-flood food insecurity → Pre-flood anxiety 0.97 0.26 3.79 0.000** 0.47 1.47 0.40 0.10 4.10 0.000 0.21 0.60   Pre-flood trauma → Post-flood anxiety 0.65 0.34 1.91 0.056 −0.02 1.32 0.21 0.11 1.93 0.053 −0.00 0.42   Pre-flood food insecurity → Post-flood anxiety 0.29 0.29 1.00 0.318 −0.28 0.85 0.12 0.12 1.00 0.317 −0.11 0.34   Pre-flood anxiety → Post-flood anxiety 0.29 0.12 2.33 0.020* 0.05 0.53 0.28 0.12 2.40 0.02 0.05 0.50   Loss of infrastructure → Post-flood anxiety 0.34 0.18 1.89 0.058 −0.01 0.69 0.20 0.11 1.91 0.056 −0.01 0.41   Pre-flood anxiety → Loss of infrastructure  0.13 0.07 1.85 0.064 −0.01 0.28 0.22 0.11 1.90 0.058 −0.01 0.44 Variances   Pre-flood trauma 2.84 0.48 2.04 3.97 1 0 1 1   Pre-flood food insecurity 4.59 0.78 3.29 6.41 1 0 1 1   Pre-flood anxiety 19.73 3.36 14.13 27.54 19.73 3.36 14.13 27.54   Post-flood anxiety 20.40 3.47 14.61 28.48 0.72 0.09 0.56 0.92   Loss of infrastructure  9.64 1.64 6.90 13.45 0.95 0.05 0.86 1.06   Equation-level goodness of fit R2   Pre-flood anxiety 0.25   Post-flood anxiety 0.28   Loss of infrastructure 0.05 216 J. Nöthling et al. 1 3 Lack of access to resources have been linked to adverse mental health outcomes following flooding in previous studies, especially in the context of poverty, loss of belongings and loss of shelter (Bouchard et  al. 2022; Cianconi et al. 2020). The severe damage to infrastructure observed in the April floods resulted in many women being unable to travel, work and collect wages and food insecure children were unable to access school feeding schemes (Bouchard et al. 2022). The anxiety associated with being unable to adequately feed children and family members was most likely compounded by the extra flood-related barriers to meeting these needs (Cianconi et al. 2020). Strengths and limitations A particular strength of the study is that a baseline mental health assessment was available for this sample of women before the floods occurred which allowed us to compare pre- to post-flood changes in mental health. However, the sample was small and limited to women from low-income settings in the eThekwini municipal region of Durban, which limits generalizability to males and those residing in higher income regions who were also affected by the floods. The use of convenience sampling further limits generalizability. The flood impact questionnaire and the composite trauma load score has not been used before in prior studies and has not undergone a comprehensive validation assessment. We did not assess the availability and use of material and mental health assistance in the post-flood period and it is likely that these forms of assistance may have played a protective role against adverse mental health outcomes. Similarly, we also did not investigate physical health, family- and intimate relationship-related variables which may have served as risk or protective factors. The assessments were completed within two to three months of the floods occurring and the potential longer term adverse mental health effects related to floods was not captured. Conclusion In conclusion, rapid expansion of informal settlements coupled with insufficient infrastructure development (e.g. water, sanitation, storm water drains), service planning and delivery (e.g. access to food, shelter, emergency response, healthcare) and high levels of poverty potentially places those exposed to floods at higher risk for adverse mental health outcomes (Borg et al. 2021; Opoku et al. 2021). Proactive approaches to diminishing the impact of floods are needed such as improving and maintaining infrastructure and service delivery as well as creating flood warning systems that will reach informal settlements (e.g. community informants and social media alerts rather than formal weather forecasts disseminated through television and internet-based news channels) (Fernandez et al. 2015; Okaka and Odhiambo 2019). Women affected by poverty, food insecurity, a history of trauma and prior adverse mental health may be vulnerable to the additive adverse mental health effects of natural disasters such as floods, but it is also likely that women who are constantly faced with adversity have a higher tolerance to additive stressors and are able to recover more rapidly than what would be expected (Bouchard et al. 2022; Charlson et al. 2021; Fernandez et al. 2015). Longitudinal follow-up studies conducted in LMIC over a period of a year or more may provide a clearer picture of the acute, post-acute and chronic adverse mental health outcomes associated with floods. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplemen- tary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00737- 023- 01384-3. Author contribution Jani Nöthling: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing original draft. Andrew Gibbs: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, review and editing. Laura Washington: data curation, investigation, project administration, review and editing. Sithabisile Gugulethu Gigaba: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, review and editing. Samantha Willan: conceptualization, data curation, investigation, project administration, methodology, review and editing. Naeemah Abrahams: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, review and editing. Rachel Jewkes: conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, review and editing. Funding Open access funding provided by South African Medical Research Council. The study was conducted with funding received from the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) and the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) mechanism under the pro- ject title ‘Context and Health – An inter-disciplinary approach to under- standing and intervening on contextual factors that shape HIV-risk for young women and men in South Africa’ (MR/T029803/1), funded by the United Kingdom (UK) Research and Innovation, and managed by the SAMRC. Jani Nöthling was supported by the SAMRC through its Division of Research Capacity Development under the Intra-Mural Postdoctoral Fellowship Programme from funding received from the South African National Treasury. Data availability The data used in this paper are available on request to the corresponding author. Declarations Competing interest The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri- bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta- tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-023-01384-3 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 217Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre‑ to post‑flood exposure… 1 3 References Alderman K, Turner LR, Tong S (2012) Floods and human health: a systematic review. Environ Int 47:37–47. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. envint. 2012. 06. 003 Assanangkornchai S, Tangboonngam S, Sam-angsri N, Edwards G (2006) A Thai community’s anniversary reaction to a major cats- trophe. Stress Health 23(1):43–50 Bandla S, Nappinnai N, Gopalasamy S (2019) Psychiatric morbidity in December 2015 flood-affected population in Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Soc Psychiatry 65(4):338–344. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 00207 64019 846166 Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, Walker E, Pogge D, Ahlu- valia T, Stokes J, Handelsman L, Medrano M, Desmond D, Zule W (2003) Development and validation of a brief screening ver- sion of the childhood trauma questionnaire. Child Abuse Neglect 27(2):169–190. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0145- 2134(02) 00541-0 Bhamani A, Sobani ZA, Baqir M, Bham NS, Beg MA, Fistein E (2012) Mental health in the wake of flooding in Pakistan: an ongoing humanitarian crisis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 22(1):66–68 Borg FH, Greibe Andersen J, Karekezi C, Yonga G, Furu P, Kallestrup P, Kraef C (2021) Climate change and health in urban informal settlements in low- and middle-income countries – a scoping review of health impacts and adaptation strategies. Glob Health Action 14(1):1908064. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 16549 716. 2021. 19080 64 Bouchard J-P, Pretorius TB, Kramers-Olen AL, Padmanabhanunni A, Stiegler N (2022) Global warming and psychotraumatology of natural disasters: the case of the deadly rains and floods of April 2022 in South Africa. Ann Méd-Psychol Rev Psychiatr: S0003448722002062. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. amp. 2022. 07. 004 Charlson F, Ali S, Benmarhnia T, Pearl M, Massazza A, Augusti- navicius J, Scott JG (2021) Climate change and mental health: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(9):4486. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ ijerp h1809 4486 Chowell G, Mizumoto K, Banda JM, Poccia S, Perrings C (2019) Assessing the potential impact of vector-borne disease transmis- sion following heavy rainfall events: a mathematical framework. Phil Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 374(1775):20180272. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1098/ rstb. 2018. 0272 Cianconi P, Betrò S, Janiri L (2020) The impact of climate change on mental health: a systematic descriptive review. Front Psych 11:74. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fpsyt. 2020. 00074 Codjoe SNA, Owusu G (2011) Climate change/variability and food sys- tems: evidence from the Afram Plains, Ghana. Reg Environ Chang 11(4):753–765. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10113- 011- 0211-3 De Souza K, Kituyi E, Harvey B, Leone M, Murali KS, Ford JD (2015) Vulnerability to climate change in three hot spots in Africa and Asia: key issues for policy-relevant adaptation and resilience- building research. Reg Environ Chang 15(5):747–753. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10113- 015- 0755-8 Deitchler M, Ballard T, Swindale A, Coates J (2010) Validation of a measure of household hunger for crosscultural use. USAID Diop S, Forbes C, Chiliza GS (2010) Landslide inventorization and susceptibility mapping in South Africa. Landslides 7(2):207–210. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10346- 009- 0186-z Eccles R, Zhang H, Hamilton D (2019) A review of the effects of climate change on riverine flooding in subtropical and tropical regions. J Water Clim Chang 10(4):687–707. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2166/ wcc. 2019. 175 Elwenspoek MMC, Hengesch X, Leenen FAD, Sias K, Fernandes SB, Schaan VK, Mériaux SB, Schmitz S, Bonnemberger F, Schäch- inger H, Vögele C, Muller CP, Turner JD (2020) Glucocorticoid receptor signaling in leukocytes after early life adversity. Dev Psychopathol 32(3):853–863. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0954 57941 90011 47 Fahy B, Brenneman E, Chang H, Shandas V (2019) Spatial analysis of urban flooding and extreme heat hazard potential in Portland, OR. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 39:101117. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. ijdrr. 2019. 101117 Fernandez A, Black J, Jones M, Wilson L, Salvador-Carulla L, Astell- Burt T, Black D (2015) Flooding and mental health: a systematic mapping review. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0119929. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 01199 29 Frumkin H, Hess J, Luber G, Malilay J, McGeehin M (2008) Cli- mate change: the public health response. Am J Public Health 98(3):435–445. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2105/ AJPH. 2007. 119362 Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH (2006) Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet 368(9543):1260–1269. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/ S0140- 6736(06) 69523-8 Golitaleb M, Mazaheri E, Bonyadi M, Sahebi A (2022) Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder after flood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psych 13:890671. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3389/ fpsyt. 2022. 890671 Gruebner O, Lowe SR, Sykora M, Shankardass K, Subramanian SV, Galea S (2017) A novel surveillance approach for disaster mental health. PLoS ONE 12(7):e0181233. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 01812 33 Guha-Sapir D, Below R, Hoyois PH (2021) EM-DAT: The CRED/ OFDA International Disaster Database. Universite Catholique de Louvain. https:// www. emdat. be. Accessed June 2023 Hathaway J, Maibach EW (2018) Health implications of climate change: a review of the literature about the perception of the pub- lic and health professionals. Curr Environ Health Rep 5(1):197– 204. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s40572- 018- 0190-3 Hetherington E, McDonald S, Wu M, Tough S (2018) Risk and protec- tive factors for mental health and community cohesion after the 2013 Calgary flood. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 12(4):470– 477. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ dmp. 2017. 91 Hlahla S, Simatele MD, Hill T, Mabhaudhi T (2022) Climate-urban nexus: a study of vulnerable women in urban areas of KwaZulu- Natal Province, South Africa. Weather Clim Soc 14(3):933–948. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1175/ WCAS-D- 20- 0180.1 International Federation of the Red Cross (2022) South Africa: Floods in KwaZulu Natal - Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA), DREF Operation MDRZA012. https:// adore. ifrc. org/ MDRZA 012do. pdf Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SLT, Zaslavsky AM (2002) Short screening scale to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specifics psychological distress. Psyicgol Med May:959–976 Koenen KC, Ratanatharathorn A, Ng L, McLaughlin KA, Bromet EJ, Stein DJ, Karam EG, Meron Ruscio A, Benjet C, Scott K, Atwoli L, Petukhova M, Lim CCW, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Al-Hamzawi A, Alonso J, Bunting B, Ciutan M, De Girolamo G, …, Kessler RC (2017) Posttraumatic stress disorder in the World Mental Health Surveys. Psychol Med 47(13): 2260–2274. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1017/ S0033 29171 70007 08 McClymont K, Morrison D, Beevers L, Carmen E (2020) Flood resil- ience: a systematic review. J Environ Plan Manag 63(7):1151– 1176. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 09640 568. 2019. 16414 74 Mollica R, Caspi-Yavin Y, Bollini P, Truong T, Svang L, Lavelle J (1992) The Harvard Trauma Questionnaire—Validating a cross- cultural intrument for measuring torture, trauma and posttrau- matic stress disorder in Indochinese refugees. J Nerv Ment Dis 180(2):111–116 Okaka FO, Odhiambo BDO (2019) Households’ perception of flood risk and health impact of exposure to flooding in flood-prone informal settlements in the coastal city of Mombasa. Int J Clim https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.003 https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764019846166 https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764019846166 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00541-0 https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.1908064 https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.1908064 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2022.07.004 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094486 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0272 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0272 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0211-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0755-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0755-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0186-z https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2019.175 https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2019.175 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419001147 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419001147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101117 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101117 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119929 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119929 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.119362 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69523-8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.890671 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.890671 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181233 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181233 https://www.emdat.be https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-018-0190-3 https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2017.91 https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0180.1 https://adore.ifrc.org/MDRZA012do.pdf https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717000708 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717000708 https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474 218 J. Nöthling et al. 1 3 Chang Strateg Manag 11(4):592–606. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1108/ IJCCSM- 03- 2018- 0026 Olanrewaju CC, Reddy M (2022) Assessment and prediction of flood hazards using standardized precipitation index—A case study of eThekwini metropolitan area. J Flood Risk Manag 15(2):e12788. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jfr3. 12788 Opoku SK, Filho WL, Hubert F, Adejumo O (2021) Climate change and health preparedness in Africa: analysing trends in six African countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(9):4672. https:// doi. org/ 10. 3390/ ijerp h1809 4672 Radloff L (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385– 401. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ ardp. 19552 881111 Sohrabizadeh S, Tourani S, Khankeh HR (2016) Women and health consequences of natural disasters: challenge or opportunity? Women Health 56(8). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 03630 242. 2016. 11761 01 South African Weather Service (2022) Extreme rainfall and widespread flooding overnight: KwaZulu-Natal and parts of Eastern Cape. https:// www. weath ersa. co. za/ Docum ents/ Corpo rate/ Medre l12Ap ril20 22_ 12042 02214 2120. pdf. Accessed June 2023 Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1092. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1001/ archi nte. 166. 10. 1092 Stanke C, Murray V, Amlôt R, Nurse J, Williams R (2012) The effects of flooding on mental health: outcomes and recommendations from a review of the literature. PLoS Curr. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ 4f9f1 fa9c3 cae Suhr F, Steinert JI (2022) Epidemiology of floods in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of health outcomes. BMC Public Health 22(1):268. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12889- 022- 12584-4 Veenema TG, Thornton CP, Lavin RP, Bender AK, Seal S, Corley A (2017) Climate change-related water disasters’ impact on popula- tion health: climate change disasters health impact. J Nurs Schol- arsh 49(6):625–634. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jnu. 12328 Waite TD, Chaintarli K, Beck CR, Bone A, Amlôt R, Kovats S, Reacher M, Armstrong B, Leonardi G, Rubin GJ, Oliver I (2017) The Eng- lish national cohort study of flooding and health: cross-sectional analysis of mental health outcomes at year one. BMC Public Health 17(1):129. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12889- 016- 4000-2 Williams DS, Máñez Costa M, Sutherland C, Celliers L, Scheffran J (2019) Vulnerability of informal settlements in the context of rapid urbanization and climate change. Environ Urban 31(1):157– 176. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09562 47818 819694 Zarse EM, Neff MR, Yoder R, Hulvershorn L, Chambers JE, Chambers RA (2019) The adverse childhood experiences questionnaire: two decades of research on childhood trauma as a primary cause of adult mental illness, addiction, and medical diseases. Cogent Med 6(1):1581447. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 23312 05X. 2019. 15814 47 Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2018-0026 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2018-0026 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12788 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094672 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094672 https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.19552881111 https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2016.1176101 https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2016.1176101 https://www.weathersa.co.za/Documents/Corporate/Medrel12April2022_12042022142120.pdf https://www.weathersa.co.za/Documents/Corporate/Medrel12April2022_12042022142120.pdf https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 https://doi.org/10.1371/4f9f1fa9c3cae https://doi.org/10.1371/4f9f1fa9c3cae https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12584-4 https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12328 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-4000-2 https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818819694 https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2019.1581447 Change in emotional distress, anxiety, depression and PTSD from pre- to post-flood exposure in women residing in low-income settings in South Africa Abstract Introduction Methods Participants and setting Procedure Measures Data analysis Results Baseline demographic, food insecurity and prior trauma characteristics of the sample Pre- and post-flood mental health characteristics of the sample Damage, loss, and interpersonal impact of the floods Relationship between flood-related trauma and post-flood mental health outcomes Relationship between food insecurity, prior trauma and pre- and post-flood mental health outcomes Pathways to post-flood emotional distress Pathways to post-flood anxiety Discussion Strengths and limitations Conclusion References