TRANSFORMING NURSING IN SOUTH AFRICA Does moonlighting influence South African nurses’ intention to leave their primary jobs? Laetitia C. Rispel1*, Tobias Chirwa2 and Duane Blaauw1 1Centre for Health Policy & Medical Research Council Health Policy Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 2Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Background: Staff retention and turnover have risen in prominence in the global discourse on the health workforce. Moonlighting, having a second job in addition to a primary job, has not featured in debates on turnover. Objective: This paper examines whether moonlighting is a determinant of South African nurses’ intention to leave their primary jobs. Design: During 2010, a one-stage cluster random sample of 80 hospitals was selected in four South African provinces. On the survey day, all nurses working in critical care, theatre, emergency, maternity, and general medical and surgical wards completed a self-administered questionnaire after giving informed consent. In addition to demographic information and information on moonlighting, the questionnaire obtained information on the participants’ intention to leave their primary jobs in the 12 months following the survey. A weighted analysis of the survey data was done using STATA† 13. Results: Survey participants (n�3,784) were predominantly middle-aged with a mean age of 41.5 (SD910.4) years. Almost one-third of survey participants (30.9%) indicated that they planned to leave their jobs within 12 months. Intention to leave was higher among the moonlighters (39.5%) compared to non-moonlighters (27.9%; pB0.001). Predictors of intention to leave in a multiple logistic regression were moonlighting in the preceding year, nursing category, sector of primary employment, period working at the primary job, and number of children. The odds of intention to leave was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.16�1.69) times higher for moonlighters than for non-moonlighters. The odds ratio of intention to leave was 0.53 (95% CI: 0.42�0.66) for nursing assistants compared to professional nurses and 2.09 (95% CI: 1.49�2.94) for nurses working for a commercial nursing agency compared to those working in the public sector. Conclusions: Moonlighting is a predictor of intention to leave. Both individual and organisational strategies are needed to manage moonlighting and to enhance retention among South African nurses. Keywords: intention to leave; turnover; moonlighting; nurses; South Africa *Correspondence to: Laetitia C. Rispel, Centre for Health Policy & Medical Research Council Health Policy Research Group, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 27 St. Andrew’s Road, Parktown, 2193, Johannesburg, South Africa, Email: laetitia.rispel@wits.ac.za This paper is part of the Special Issue: Transforming Nursing in South Africa. More papers from this issue can be found at http://www.globalhealthaction.net Received: 17 August 2014; Revised: 1 October 2014; Accepted: 2 October 2014; Published: 22 December 2014 I n recent years, staff retention, or the extent to which health care providers remain in the health system, has risen in prominence in the global discourse on the health workforce, because of its potential to improve their availability and accessibility (1�3). The related concept of staff turnover, or the rate at which an employer loses and gains employees (4, p. 1181), has generated numerous theoretical models that provide perspectives from the fields of economics, psychology, and organisational develop- ment (5�11). Notwithstanding inconsistencies in defini- tions and measurement, and the lack of differentiation between voluntary (employee-initiated) and involuntary (employer-initiated) turnover (9, 12, 13), the focus of these models has mostly been on voluntary turnover (5�11). In the health system, high turnover of skilled health professionals has both economic and non-economic con- sequences (2, 11, 13, 14). These include the direct and indirect costs of recruitment and staff replacement, staff shortages, increased workloads of and demands on existing staff, and the potential risks of not being able to provide Global Health Action � Global Health Action 2014. # 2014 Laetitia C. Rispel et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. 1 Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 25754 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 (page number not for citation purpose) http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/issue/view/1602#Transforming%20Nursing%20in%20South%20Africa http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/issue/view/1602#Transforming%20Nursing%20in%20South%20Africa http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/25754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 safe and quality care to patients (11, 13, 14). Nurse turn- over has generated an extensive body of literature over several decades (4, 11, 13�25). Much of this literature on nurse turnover focuses on high-income countries, although there is increasing attention on turnover and its predictors in low- and middle-income countries (19, 26� 29). Given the numerical dominance of nurses in many countries, high turnover among nurses has the potential to affect health care provision to patients and commu- nities (3, 11, 13, 30, 31) and the morale, performance, and productivity of the remaining nurses (13, 32). The reasons for high nurse turnover remain complex, and may vary over time (4). Nonetheless, existing evi- dence suggests that the causes of high turnover include various combinations of individual, organisational, and economic factors (4, 11�13, 15). At the individual level, the literature abounds with studies that demonstrate an inverse relationship between job satisfaction in nursing and turnover (4, 5, 7, 13, 15�19, 24, 25, 30, 33, 34). An equally consistent finding is that turnover intention (or intention to leave) is the strongest antecedent of actual turnover and is also an intermediate variable between job satisfaction and turnover (7�9). However, scholars have pointed out that the notion of job satisfaction itself is multifaceted and mediated by context, the work envi- ronment, demographic characteristics, personality type, individual motives, and experiences (4, 9, 13, 17, 22, 23, 30, 35�40). At the organisational level, studies have found that the factors that influence nurse turnover include workload, work schedules, workplace stress, leadership and management styles, training and promotional op- portunities and a disjuncture between nurse expectations and the reality of the workplace (7, 21, 27, 30, 36, 41�45). In terms of economic factors, existing evidence suggests that remuneration and financial rewards influence staff turnover (4, 46), but financial incentives on their own are insufficient as a retention strategy (46). Notwithstanding the voluminous literature, there are knowledge gaps in the studies on nurse turnover. These gaps include limited empirical information on the cost of nurse turnover to a health facility or the system as a whole and the impact of turnover on patient outcomes (13). Organisational development scholars have sug- gested that other forms of withdrawal such as absentee- ism, passive job behaviour, or moonlighting (holding a second job in addition to a primary full-time job) could precede actual turnover (8, 9, 47, 48) and deserve more attention. We could not find any empirical studies that examine the relationship between moonlighting and nurse turnover intention or actual turnover. In South Africa, the shortages and high turnover of nurses (49) impede the implementation of major health system reforms. Moonlighting is permitted in the South African public sector under specified conditions, which includes obtaining formal permission, though not all nurses do so (50). Nonetheless, moonlighting is wide- spread in South Africa. A 2010 survey found that 28.0% of nurses had done moonlighting in the year preceding the survey (51). Using data from the same survey, this paper examines factors associated with intention to leave and evaluates whether moonlighting is a predictor of nurses’ intention to leave their primary jobs. The findings of the study are part of a larger research project to examine casualisation in the nursing profession. Methods During 2010, a one-stage cluster random sample of 80 hospitals was selected from the four South African pro- vinces of the Eastern Cape (predominantly rural, but with a few large cities), Free State (mixed urban and rural), Gauteng (urban), and the Western Cape (pre- dominantly urban). The Human Research Ethics Com- mittee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg provided ethics approval for the study. The relevant public and private health care authorities also provided the necessary study approvals. All partici- pants provided written, informed consent. In each of the four provinces, the sampling frame con- sisted of all public and private hospitals, stratified by type of hospital for public hospitals; and by ownership and hospital bed numbers for private hospitals. A random sample of public and private sector hospitals was then selected from each stratum proportional to the total number of hospitals in that stratum. On the 24-hour survey day, all nurses working in critical care, theatre, emergency, maternity, and general medical and surgical wards completed a self-administered questionnaire after giving informed consent. In addition to demographic information and information on moon- lighting, the questionnaire obtained information on the participants’ intention to leave their primary jobs in the 12 months following the survey. Further details of the sur- vey methodology are provided in the previous article (51). In the study moonlighting was defined as additional paid work � whether of a nursing or non-nursing nature � done by nurses in a private health facility, another gov- ernment health facility, an insurance company, private health laboratory, or in the same health care facility while holding a primary, paid nursing job, but excluding overtime (51). Intention to leave was measured through one question: ‘In the next 12 months, do you plan to leave your current primary job?’ Data were weighted to reflect the population distribu- tion of nurses between the public and private health sectors, and the four study provinces, and analysed using STATA† 13. We also adjusted for the clustering and strati- fication introduced by the sampling design. Frequency tabulations were done to describe the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents. Cross-tabulations were done to investigate associations of each of the factors, Laetitia C. Rispel et al. 2 (page number not for citation purpose) Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 25754 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/25754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 including moonlighting, with the intention to leave employment in the 12 months following the survey, our main outcome of interest. Bivariate logistic regression models were fitted and only factors found to be sta- tistically significantly associated with intention to leave at a conservative 20% level were considered in the final model-building process using a multiple logistic regres- sion model. All other statistical tests were carried out at 5% significance level. Results Participant characteristics The unweighted demographic and background character- istics of the 3,784 nurses recruited in the four study provinces are shown in Table 1. The majority of survey participants were female (92.7%), and employed in pro- vincial government (52.8%). The participants were predo- minantly middle-aged, with a mean age of 41.5 (SD910.4) years. A few respondents omitted to complete some of the questions which accounts for the minor variations in denominators. Factors influencing nurses’ intention to leave In the study, 1,086 participants (30.9%) indicated that they planned to leave their primary jobs in the 12 months following the survey. Of these, 15.4% indicated that they planned to go overseas, 36.7% to move to another public sector job, and 13.5% to another private sector job. The remainder were made up of smaller proportions planning to work in nursing agencies or non-governmental orga- nisations, or who planned to study, retire, or stay at home in the following year. The study participants’ intention to leave their primary jobs varied by age, province, years at the primary job, nursing category, number of children, and moonlighting status (Table 2). 37.7% of nurses aged 25�34 years indicated their intention to leave, followed by 32.6% of nurses aged 35�44 years. Intention to leave was higher among nurses with no children (37.8%), compared to those with one child (30.4%), two children (30.9%), or four or more children (24.4%). In Gauteng Province, 37.8% of nurses indicated their intention to leave, compared to the Free State (28.1%), Western Cape (25.9%), or Eastern Cape (25.5%). Intention to leave was also higher among nurses working for a commercial nursing agency (44.1%) or the private health sector (36.9%), com- pared to the provincial government (28.2%). Those nurses with less than 1 year (22.3%) or 15�19 years of service (29.4%) were less likely to intend leaving their primary job (pB0.001) compared to those with between 5 and 9 years of service (39.2%). Table 2 also shows that intention to leave varied by nursing category (pB0.001). It was highest among pro- fessional or registered nurses with 4 years of training (36.2%), than among enrolled nurses with 2 years of training (32.5%) or among nursing assistants with 1 year of training (22.1%). Lastly, the proportion of participants with intention to leave in the 12 months following the survey was higher among the moonlighters compared to non-moonlighters (39.5% vs. 27.9%; pB0.001). Among those planning to go overseas, 18% (82) of moonlighters, compared to 13.8% (89) of non- moonlighters planned to go overseas, but this difference was not statistically significant (p�0.06). Predictors of intention to leave In the multiple logistic regression analysis, predictors of intention to leave were: moonlighting in the preceding Table 1. Demographic and employment characteristics of survey participants Characteristic Total (n�3,784) Mean age (standard deviation) 41.5 (10.4) Age group (years) B25 150 (4.1%) 25�34 888 (24.1%) 35�44 1,112 (30.2%) 45�54 1,115 (30.3%) 55� 414 (11.2%) Sex Female 3,489 (92.7%) Male 276 (7.3%) Marital status Married 1,693 (45.0%) Living together 130 (3.5%) Single 1,328 (35.3%) Divorced/separated 410 (10.9%) Widowed 201 (5.3%) Children Median number of children (range) 2 (1�14) Median age of youngest child 12 Nursing category Professional nurse 1,910 (51.5%) Enrolled nurse 818 (22.1%) Auxiliary nurse 982 (26.5%) Median years qualified as a nurse (mean) 15 (15.9) Primary job (sector) Provincial government 1,955 (52.8%) Private sector 1,400 (37.8%) Nursing agency 346 (9.4%) Median years at primary job (mean; range) 7 (10.3; 1�47) Unit of work Paediatric critical care 183 (5.1%) Adult critical care 421 (11.8%) High care 33 (0.9%) Theatre 668 (18.8%) Emergency 392 (11.0%) Maternity 574 (16.1%) General wards 1,140 (32.0%) Psychiatry 117 (3.3%) Outpatient department 30 (0.8%) Nurse moonlighting and intention to leave Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 25754 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 3 (page number not for citation purpose) http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/25754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 year, nursing category, sector of primary employment, period working at the primary job, and number of children (Table 3). The weighted crude (unadjusted) odds for intention to leave the primary job in the 12 months following the survey were 1.69 (95% CI: 1.41�2.02) times higher among the moonlighters compared to the non-moonlighters. This was still significant (OR�1.40, 95% CI: 1.16�1.69) after adjusting for other factors such as nursing category, sector of primary job and years working in primary job, sector and province of primary employment. The adjusted analysis shows that individuals working for a commercial nursing agency (OR�2.09, 95% CI: 1.49�2.94) were more likely to express intention to leave, compared to those working in the provincial government. Enrolled nurses (OR�0.79, 95% CI: 0.62�1.01) or nursing assistants (OR�0.53, 95% CI: 0.42�0.66) were less likely to report intention to leave compared to pro- fessional nurses. The odds of individuals who have worked for 1�4 years to report intention to leave their primary job in the 12 months following the survey were 2.21 (92% CI: 1.59�3.07) times higher compared to those who have worked for less than 1 year. The intentions peak Table 2. Bivariate analysis of factors influencing nurses’ intention to leave their jobs within 12 months Variable n Intention to leave (%) P Total 3,513 1,086 (30.9%) Moonlighting in the past 12 months B0.001 No 2,477 690 (27.9%) Yes 965 381 (39.5%) Province B0.001 Gauteng 1,461 552 (37.8%) Eastern Cape 935 239 (25.5%) Western Cape 795 206 (25.9%) Free State 322 91 (28.1%) Age group (in years) B0.001 B25 126 34 (26.8%) 25�34 864 326 (37.7%) 35�44 981 320 (32.6%) 45�54 1,026 265 (25.8%) 55� 410 106 (25.8%) Sex 0.181 Male 272 96 (35.3%) Female 3,234 988 (30.6%) Marital status 0.447 Married/living together 1,592 495 (31.1%) Single 1,406 447 (31.8%) Divorced/widowed 503 142 (28.2%) Number of children 0.005 None 593 224 (37.8%) One 794 241 (30.4%) Two 1,084 335 (30.9%) Three 669 194 (29.0%) Four or more 363 88 (24.4%) Sector B0.001 Public 2,561 722 (28.2%) Private 671 248 (36.9%) Agency 216 95 (44.1%) Nursing category B0.001 Professional nurse 1,682 609 (36.2%) Enrolled nurse 699 227 (32.5%) Nursing assistant 1,132 251 (22.1%) Years working at primary job B0.001 Less than 1 379 84 (22.3%) 1�4 911 321 (35.2%) 5�9 652 255 (39.2%) 10�14 323 100 (31.1%) 15�19 298 88 (29.4%) 20 or more 873 219 (25.1%) Table 3. Final multiple logistic regression model results for factors associated with nurses’ intention to leave their primary jobs within 12 months Variable Odds ratio [95% CI] P Moonlighting in the previous 12 months No � � Yes 1.40 [1.16�1.69] B0.001 Province Gauteng � � � Eastern Cape 0.70 [0.54�0.91] 0.008 Western Cape 0.60 [0.49�0.75] B0.001 Free State 0.71 [0.56�0.89] 0.004 Sector Provincial government � � � Private sector 1.11 [0.91�1.35] 0.293 Nursing agency 2.09 [1.49�2.94] B0.001 Years working at primary job B1 � � � 1�4 2.21 [1.59�3.07] B0.001 5�9 2.55 [1.80�3.61] B0.001 10�14 1.69 [1.13�2.53] 0.011 15�19 1.70 [1.11�2.61] 0.016 20 or more 1.61 [1.12�2.31] 0.010 Nursing category Professional nurse � � � Enrolled nurse 0.79 [0.62�1.01] 0.058 Nursing assistant 0.53 [0.42�0.66] B0.001 Number of children None � � � One 0.71 [0.54�0.95] 0.019 Two 0.71 [0.55�0.92] 0.010 Three 0.70 [0.52�0.95] 0.022 Four or more 0.59 [0.40�0.87] 0.008 Constant 0.44 [0.31�0.64] B0.001 Laetitia C. Rispel et al. 4 (page number not for citation purpose) Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 25754 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/25754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 among those with 5�9 years’ experience (OR�2.55, 95% CI: 1.80�3.61). In later years of working experience, although the odds of participants reporting intention (ORs: 1.61�1.70) to leave were higher, the results show a fall in such intentions in relation to the reference group. The adjusted results also show a decline in nurses’ inten- tions to leave their primary jobs with increasing number of children. The odds ratios range from 0.71 (95% CI: 0.54�0.95) among those with one child to 0.59 (95% CI: 0.40�0.87) among those with four or more children compared to those with no children. Discussion We found that almost one-third (30.9%) of respondents indicated their intention to leave their primary employ- ment in the 12 months following the survey. This figure was lower than the turnover intent of nurses found in other studies done in South Africa in recent years (19, 26). A 2005 study to examine the relationship between job satisfaction, turnover intent, and demographic variables among primary health care nurses in a rural South African area found that 51.1% of these nurses considered leaving within 2 years following the study (19). Another study that aimed to compare the job satisfaction and inten- tion to leave among different categories of health workers in Tanzania, Malawi, and South Africa found that 41.4% of South African health workers indicated that they were actively seeking other jobs, compared to 26.5% in Malawi, and 18.1% in Tanzania (26). However, these studies are not directly comparable as they comprised of different study populations, with different approaches to the mea- surement of intention to leave. There are wide variations in study findings on turnover intent. The finding of 30.9% turnover intent in our study is similar to that found in Belgian hospitals done as part of a multi-country study � 30% of Belgian registered nurses indicated that they planned to leave their jobs (52). The multi-country hospital study, done in Europe and the United States of America (USA), examined patient safety, satisfaction, quality of hospital care, and nurse outcomes and found that intention to leave ranged from a low of 14% in the USA to a high of 49% in Greece and Finland (52). A 2007 study in Senegal among public sector midwives found that 58.9% of midwives reported their intention to leave within a year (28). This is in contrast to a study in Chinese hospitals that found that only 5% of nurses indicated their intention to leave (29). These differences in turnover intent might be explained by different contexts, study populations, and measure- ment methods. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, the pre- dictors of intention to leave were: category of nurse, primary employment in a commercial nursing agency, working for between 1 and 10 years at the primary job, and moonlighting in the preceding year (Table 3). Enrolled nurses or nursing assistants were less likely to report intention to leave compared to professional nurses (Table 3). This may reflect the higher qualifications and skills of professional (registered) nurses, with greater potential for international movement and transferability of experience and skills. We could not find many studies that examine the relationship between nursing category, and intention to leave, as the bulk of the literature focuses on registered (professional) nurses (4, 13, 15, 42). A United Kingdom study that focused primarily on appro- priate retention strategies found that enrolled nurses had greater job satisfaction than registered nurses and lower intention to quit, which may have been the result of ‘lower expectations in terms of pay and promotion due to their constrained promotion prospects’ (30, p. 689). Surprisingly, nurses working for a commercial nursing agency were more likely to indicate their intention to leave, compared to those working in the public health sector. This may be related to the timing of the study, as there was a major public sector financial incentive policy implemented 2 years prior to the survey, which assisted in attracting large numbers of nurses back to the public health sector (53, 54). The study found that those nurses working for between 1 and 10 years at the primary job were more likely to indicate their intention to leave. A 2005 study to examine the relationship between job satisfaction, turnover intent, and demographic variables among primary health care nurses in a rural area of South Africa found that turnover intent was significantly and inversely correlated with the number of years of nursing (19). However, the literature suggests that the relationship between length of service (tenure) and turnover is complex, because of possible confounding factors such as context, work environment, experience, and age (4, 13, 17, 25, 29, 42, 43, 45). This is one of the first studies to examine the relation- ship between moonlighting and nurses’ intention to leave. We found a significant association between moonlighting and nurses’ intention to leave their primary jobs (39.5% among the moonlighters compared to 28% among non- moonlighters). The adjusted odds for intention to leave the primary job in the 12 months following the survey were 1.40 times higher among moonlighting nurses com- pared to the non-moonlighters. Organisational develop- ment researchers have suggested that moonlighting provides workers with an alternative source of income, training, and benefits, thus influencing turnover (47). This theory was supported by the 2010 moonlighting survey in South Africa that found multiple and varied motivations for moonlighting, including financial reasons and non- financial reasons such as taking care of patients, the opportunity to learn new nursing skills, and collegial rela- tionships (51). However, moonlighting could also change staff perceptions, decisions, and behaviours, which may impact on turnover at their primary jobs either positively Nurse moonlighting and intention to leave Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 25754 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 5 (page number not for citation purpose) http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/25754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 (in the decision to stay because of alternative benefits provided by the secondary job) or negatively (in accel- erating actual turnover) (47). Our study suggests that moonlighting may accelerate nurse turnover intent. Although other studies have demonstrated that nurse absenteeism predicts turnover (11, 48, 55), we could not find similar or comparable studies on moonlighting and intention to leave in other low- or middle-income country settings, or even in high-income countries. Hence, more research is needed to determine whether and how moonlighting contributes to high nurse turnover intent, and ultimately to turnover. The limitations of the study include: the cross-sectional study design which can only capture nurses remaining in their jobs; the possible social desirability bias resulting in lower disclosures of dissatisfaction, moonlighting, or intention to leave; and the fact that nurses who had not formally obtained permission for moonlighting may have been reluctant to admit to it. These limitations are dis- cussed in more detail in the previous article (51). Although intention to leave is a very strong predictor of actual turnover, the expressed intentions of these nurses may not result in actual turnover. For example, the midwives study in Senegal found that although 58.9% reported their intention to leave within a year, the annual turnover rate was found to be only 9% due to limited job alternatives (28). Notwithstanding these limitations, our study is one of the first to examine the relationship between moon- lighting and intention to leave. The study also enhances our understanding of the under-explored concept of moonlighting among South African nurses, who may be using moonlighting as a way of finding out whether changing jobs is possible and facilitating their decision- making to leave. Our study findings have implications for health work- force policies and management, and for quality of care. As indicated above, high nurse turnover has the potential to affect health care provision to patients (3, 11, 13, 30, 31) and the morale, performance, and productivity of the remaining nurses (13, 32). South Africa’s five-year plan on human resources for health emphasises the importance of staff retention, both as a strategic imperative and as an outcome (49). Similarly, the strategic plan on nurse education, training, and practice highlights the importance of nurse retention (56). Moonlighting and high nurse turnover have to be addressed in tandem, as these issues have significant im- plications for quality of care in health facilities. The impor- tance of safe, quality care to patients in South Africa is emphasised by the national core standards (57). Although both staff retention and mechanisms to address quality of care are highlighted in various policy documents (49, 56, 57), a key challenge in South Africa has been in translating laudable plans and strategies into action (58, 59). Much more concrete action is needed to create positive practice environments, as there is evidence that these improve nurse retention and quality of patient care (13, 60, 61). In practical terms, strategies to create positive practice environments include: nurse participa- tion in organisational matters; nursing practice which is flexible, meaningful and effective; leadership and support by nurse managers; adequate staffing and resources; and collaborative doctor-nurse relationships (61, p. 88). A first step in the management of moonlighting is to recognise that it is widespread (51) and motivated by both financial and non-financial reasons. Hence, there is need for dialogue and debate on moonlighting in the South African health system, and the ethical and ac- countability issues that arise from nurses engaging in a second job, while employed full-time. The non-financial reasons for moonlighting such as recognition and ap- preciation for exemplary nursing services link to the strategies needed to create positive practice environments (60, 61). Key strategies such as participatory workplace forums and enhanced teamwork and collegial relation- ships do not require significant additional money or resources. In the medium term, a uniform national monitoring and evaluation system should be developed, which in- cludes indicators such as nurses’ absenteeism rates and trends, and total number of hours worked by each nurse, through improved employer personnel or nursing council information systems. Conclusions Both the public and private health sectors in South Africa have a statutory duty to provide the best possible health care to patients within available resources and to achieve a balance between the rights and duties of health care pro- viders (62). The study has found an association between moonlighting and intention to leave, which would need to be confirmed by other studies. The study points to the need for improved management of moonlighting and implementation of strategies for nurse retention in the South African health system. Acknowledgements We thank the RESON advisory committee members for their support and guidance. We are grateful to the managers in the public and private health sectors who facilitated the study, and to all the nurses who participated. Katinka de Wet, Thembakazi Matsheke, and Pascalia Munyewende are thanked for facilitating and overseeing the fieldwork. Conflict of interest and funding The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise. This study was funded by the Atlantic Philan- thropies (Grant ID: 15 962). The views expressed in this study are those of the authors and not of the funder. Laetitia C. Rispel et al. 6 (page number not for citation purpose) Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 25754 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/25754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 References 1. WHO (2010). Increasing access to health workers in remote and rural areas through improved retention. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2. Global Health Workforce Alliance, WHO (2013). A universal truth: no health without a workforce. Geneva: World Health Organization. 3. Campbell J, Buchan J, Cometto G, David B, Dussault G, Fogstad H, et al. Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull World Health Organ 2013; 91: 853�63. 4. Currie EJ, Carr Hill RA. What are the reasons for high turnover in nursing? A discussion of presumed causal factors and remedies. Int J Nurs Stud 2012; 49: 1180�9. 5. Lambert EG, Hogan NL, Barton SM. The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: a test of a structural measure- ment model using a national sample of workers. Soc Sci J 2001; 38: 233�50. 6. Bluedorn A. A unified model of turnover from organizations. Hum Relat 1982; 35: 135�53. 7. Price JL, Mueller CW. A causal model of turnover for nurses. Acad Manag J 1981; 24: 543�65. 8. Mobley W. Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. J Appl Psychol 1977; 6: 237�40. 9. Tett R, Meyer J. Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta- analytic findings. Pers Psychol 1993; 46: 259�93. 10. Porter LW, Steers RM, Mowday RT. Organizational com- mitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. J Appl Psychol 1974; 59: 603�9. 11. Daouk-Oyry L, Anouze A-L, Otaki F, Dumit NY, Osman I. The JOINT model of nurse absenteeism and turnover: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 2014; 51: 93�110. 12. Tai TWC, Bame SI, Robinson CD. Review of nursing turnover research, 1977�1996. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 1905�24. 13. Hayes LJ, O’Brien-Pallasa L, Duffield C, Shamian J, Buchan J, Hughes F, et al. Nurse turnover: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2006; 43: 237�63. 14. Jones C, Gates M. The costs and benefits of nurse turnover: a business case for nurse retention. Online J Issues Nurs 2007; 12: Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol12No03Man04. 15. Gauci Borda R, Norman IJ. Factors influencing turnover and absence of nurses: a research review. Int J Nurs Stud 1997; 34: 385�94. 16. Chen H-C, Chu C-I, Wang Y-L, Lin L-C. Turnover factors revisited: a longitudinal study of Taiwan-based staff nurses. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 277�85. 17. Coomber B, Barriball KL. Impact of job satisfaction compo- nents on intent to leave and turnover for hospital-based nurses: a review of the research literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2007; 44: 297�314. 18. Currivan DB. The causal order of job satisfaction and org- anizational commitment in models of employee turnover. Hum Resour Manag Rev 1999; 9: 495�524. 19. Delobelle P, Rawlinson JL, Ntuli S, Malatsi I, Decock R, Depoorter A-M. Job satisfaction and turnover intent of primary healthcare nurses in rural South Africa: a questionnaire survey. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67: 371�83. 20. Gormley DK. Are we on the same page? Staff nurse and manager perceptions of work environment, quality of care and anticipated nurse turnover. J Nurs Manag 2011; 19: 33�40. 21. Raup GH. The impact of ED nurse manager leadership style on staff nurse turnover and patient satisfaction in academic health center hospitals. J Emerg Nurs 2008; 34: 403�9. 22. De Milt DG, Fitzpatrick JJ, Sister Rita M. Nurse practitioners’ job satisfaction and intent to leave current positions, the nursing profession, and the nurse practitioner role as a direct care provider. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2011; 23: 42�50. 23. Heinen MM, van Achterberg T, Schwendimann R, Zander B, Matthews A, Kozka M, et al. Nurses’ intention to leave their profession: a cross sectional observational study in 10 European countries. Int J Nurs Stud 2013; 50: 174�84. 24. Larrabee JH, Janney MA, Ostrow CL, Withrow ML, Hobbs GR, Jr., Burant C. Predicting registered nurse job satisfaction and intent to leave. J Nurs Adm 2003; 33: 271�83. 25. McCarthy G, Tyrrell MP, Lehane E. Intention to ‘leave’ or ‘stay’ in nursing. J Nurs Manag 2007; 15: 248�55. 26. Blaauw D, Ditlopo P, Maseko F, Chirwa M, Mwisongo A, Bidwell P, et al. Comparing the job satisfaction and intention to leave of different categories of health workers in Tanzania, Malawi, and South Africa. Glob Health Action 2013; 6: 19287, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.19287 27. Nassar ME, Abdou HA, Mohmoud NA. Relationship between management styles and nurses’ retention at private hospitals. Alexandria J Med 2011; 47: 243�9. 28. Rouleau D, Fournier P, Philibert A, Mbengue B, Dumont A. The effects of midwives’ job satisfaction on burnout, intention to quit and turnover: a longitudinal study in Senegal. Hum Resour Health 2012; 10: 9. 29. Zhang L-F, You L-M, Liu K, Zheng J, Fang J-B, Lu M-M, et al. The association of Chinese hospital work environment with nurse burnout, job satisfaction, and intention to leave. Nurs Outlook 2014; 62: 128�37. 30. Shields MA, Ward M. Improving nurse retention in the National Health Service in England: the impact of job satisfac- tion on intentions to quit. J Health Econ 2001; 20: 677�701. 31. Cometto G, Witter S. Tackling health workforce challenges to universal health coverage: setting targets and measuring pro- gress. Bull World Health Organ 2013; 91: 881�5. 32. Cavanagh SJ, Coffin DA. Staff turnover among hospital nurses. J Adv Nurs 1992; 17: 1369�76. 33. Decker FH, Harris-Kojetin LD, Bercovitz A. Intrinsic job satisfaction, overall satisfaction, and intention to leave the job among nursing assistants in nursing homes. Gerontologist 2009; 49: 596�610. 34. Ramoo V, Abdullah KL, Piaw CY. The relationship between job satisfaction and intention to leave current employment among registered nurses in a teaching hospital. J Clin Nurs 2013; 22: 3141�52. 35. Bowling NA. Is the job satisfaction�job performance relation- ship spurious? A meta-analytic examination. J Voc Behavior 2007; 71: 167�85. 36. Zeytinoglu IU, Denton M, Davies S, Baumann A, Blythe J, Boos L. Retaining nurses in their employing hospitals and in the profession: effects of job preference, unpaid overtime, impor- tance of earnings and stress. Health Pol 2006; 79: 57�72. 37. Camerino D, Conway PM, Van der Heijden BI, Estryn-Behar M, Consonni D, Gould D, et al. Low-perceived work ability, ageing and intention to leave nursing: a comparison among 10 European countries. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56: 542�52. 38. Fitzpatrick JJ, Campo TM, Graham G, Lavandero R. Certifica- tion, empowerment, and intent to leave current position and the profession among critical care nurses. Am J Crit Care 2010; 19: 218�26. 39. Flinkman M, Laine M, Leino-Kilpia H, Hasselhorn H-M, Salantera S. Explaining young registered Finnish nurses’ inten- tion to leave the profession: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45: 727�39. 40. Munyewende P, Rispel LC, Chirwa T. Positive practice environ- ments influence job satisfaction of primary health care clinic Nurse moonlighting and intention to leave Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 25754 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 7 (page number not for citation purpose) http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.19287 http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/25754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 nursing managers in two South African provinces. Hum Resour Health 2014; 12: 27. doi: 10.1186/478-4491-12-27. 41. Duffield C, Roche M, O’Brien-Pallas L, Catling-Paull C, King M. Staff satisfaction and retention and the role of the nursing unit manager. Collegian 2009; 16: 11�17. 42. Rambur B, Palumbo MV, McIntosh B, Mongeon J. Statewide analysis of RNs’ intention to leave their position. Nurs Outlook 2003; 51: 182�8. 43. Tzeng H-M. The influence of nurses’ working motivation and job satisfaction on intention to quit: an empirical investigation in Taiwan. Int J Nurs Stud 2002; 39: 867�78. 44. Van Bogaert P, Clarke S, Roelant E, Meulemans H, Van de Heyning P. Impacts of unit-level nurse practice environment and burnout on nurse-reported outcomes: a multi-level modelling approach. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19: 1664�74. 45. Takase M, Yamashita N, Oba K. Nurses’ leaving intentions: antecedents and mediating factors. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62: 295�306. 46. Willis-Shattuck M, Bidwell P, Thomas S, Wyness L, Blaauw D, Ditlopo P. Motivation and retention of health workers in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 247. doi: 10.1186/472-6963-8-247. 47. Betts SC. The decision to moonlight or quit: incorporating multiple jobholding into a model of turnover. J Organ Cult Comm Conflict 2006; 10: 63�78. 48. Davey MM, Cummings G, Newburn-Cook CV, Lo EA. Predictors of nurse absenteeism in hospitals: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag 2009; 17: 312�30. 49. DOH (2011). Human Resources for Health South Africa: HRH strategy for the health sector: 2012/13�2016/17. Pretoria: Department of Health. 50. Public Service Commission (PSC) (2007). Remunerative work outside the public service: an investigation undertaken in the Gauteng Provincial Health Sector. Pretoria: PSC. 51. Rispel LC, Blaauw D, Chirwa T, de Wet K. Factors influencing agency nursing and moonlighting among nurses in South Africa. Glob Health Action 2014; 7: 23585, doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3402/gha.v7.23585 52. Aiken LH, Sermeus W, Van den Heede K, Sloane DM, Busse R, McKee M, et al. Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States. BMJ 2012; 344: e1717. doi: 10.136/bmj.e1717. 53. Department of Public Service and Administration (2007). Implementation of the occupational specific dispensations (OSDs) for the occupations professional nurse, staff nurse and nursing assistants in the public service-File 18/2/P. Pretoria: DPSA. 54. Motsosi K, Rispel LC. Nurses perceptions of the implementa- tion of occupational specific dispensation at two district hospi- tals in Gauteng. Afr J Nurs Midwifery 2012; 14: 130�44. 55. Cohen A, Golan R. Predicting absenteeism and turnover intentions by past absenteeism and work attitudes: an empirical examination of female employees in long term nursing care facilities. Career Dev Int 2007; 12: 416�32. 56. DOH (2013). National strategic plan on nurse education, training and practice 2012/13�2016/17. Pretoria: Department of Health. 57. DOH (2010). National core standards for health establishments in South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Health. 58. Rispel L, Moorman J. Health policy reforms and policy imple- mentation in South Africa: a paradox? In: Daniel J, Naidoo P, Pillay D, Southall R, eds. New South African review 3: the second phase-tragedy or farce? Johannesburg: Wits University Press; 2013, pp. 239�260. 59. Rispel LC, Barron P. Valuing human resources: key to the success of a National Health Insurance System. Dev South Afr 2012; 29: 616�35. 60. ICN (2010). Delivering quality, serving communities: nurses leading chronic care. Geneva: International Council of Nurses. 61. Twigg D, McCullough K. Nurse retention: a review of strategies to create and enhance positive practice environments in clinical settings. Int J Nurs Stud 2014; 51: 85�92. 62. Republic of South Africa (2005). National Health Act no. 61 of 2003. Pretoria: Government Printer. Laetitia C. Rispel et al. 8 (page number not for citation purpose) Citation: Glob Health Action 2014, 7: 25754 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23585 http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/view/25754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25754 << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Dot Gain 30%) /CalRGBProfile (None) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Sheetfed Coated v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Off /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed false /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.1000 /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams false /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize false /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments false /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Remove /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile (None) /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 150 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages false /ColorImageDownsampleType /Average /ColorImageResolution 300 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages false /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages false /GrayImageDownsampleType /Average /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages false /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages false /MonoImageDownsampleType /Average /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly true /PDFXNoTrimBoxError false /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox false /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (Euroscale Coated v2) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org) /PDFXTrapped /False /CreateJDFFile false /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 /Description << /DEU /FRA /JPN /PTB /DAN /NLD /ESP /SUO /ITA /NOR /SVE /ENU >> >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice