1 
 
Relationship between the Wechsler Intelligence 
Scale for Children ? Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) 
subtests and Reading Ability 
___________________________________ 
Sunita Patel 
(0714808G) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A Research Report submitted to the Faculty of Humanities, University of the 
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of 
Masters of Education in Educational Psychology by Coursework and Research Report. 
 
Johannesburg, May, 2009 
 
 2 
 
Declaration  
 
I hereby declare that this research report is my own, unaided work, and has not been 
presented for any other degree at any other academic institution or published in any form. 
 
It is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Masters of 
Education in Education Psychology by Coursework and Research Report at the University 
of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. 
 
 
 
 
________________________                                                 
Sunita Patel        May 2009 
(0714808G) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3 
Abstract 
 
This research report attempts to identify the relationship between subtests of the Wechsler 
Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV) and reading, using the Neale Analysis of 
Reading ? Revised (NEALE-R). The subtests of the WISC-IV used for this study are 
Vocabulary, Similarities, Comprehension, Word Reasoning and Digit Span. These 
subtests have similar properties to the skills needed for reading. The study included a 
sample of 33 Grade 2 boys and girls attending an English-medium, private school in 
Gauteng. Parametric and non parametric tests were run on the sample due to the small 
size of the sample. Results showed statistically significant relationships between variables 
like the Word Reasoning, subtest and the Similarities subtests. Analyses were also run 
separately on the gender groups to determine any correlations between specific gender 
and reading ability. Significant correlations were found between the Similarities subtest of 
the WISC-IV and the Accuracy subtest of the Neale-R; and Word Reasoning on the WISC-
 IV and Comprehension on the Neale-R. However overall on gender analysis showed a 
decrease in difference on performance levels between boys and girls. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 4 
Acknowledgements 
 
I would like to thank my supervisor, Kate Cockcroft for being so patient and understanding 
with me and for believing in me. 
 
I would like to acknowledge my parents, who have always believed in me, and given me 
the strength to go out and get what I want. 
 
A special thank you to my husband, Nayan who has been the wind beneath my wings. 
Thank you for always being my pillar of strength in my times of weakness and for taking 
this journey with me. 
 
Pooja: Thank you for always being there for me and supporting me through the rough 
times.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5 
Table of Contents 
 
 
Title Page          1 
Declaration                                                                                                     2 
Abstract          3 
Acknowledgements         4 
Table of Contents         5 
List of Appendixes         6 
 
1. CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION      7 
 
2. CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW     11 
 
3. CHAPTER THREE: METHOD        51 
 
4. CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS           60 
 
5. CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND LIMITATIONS  70 
 
6. REFERENCES          80 
 
7. APPENDICCES         93 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6 
 
List of Appendices 
 
Appendix A Letter to schools        93 
 
Appendix B Letter to parents         94 
 
Appendix C Biographical Questionnaire       96 
 
Appendix D Child?s letter of ascent       98 
 
Appendix E Histograms for separate subtests      99 
 
Appendix F University Ethics Certificate       107 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 7 
Chapter One 
 
Introduction 
 
Consider the following scenario involving a learner named Johnny, who lives with his 
maternal grandmother and younger sister in a shack in Soweto. Both Johnny?s parents 
died from AIDS. Johnny?s friend?s mother helped his grandmother place Johnny in a rural 
school. Johnny is seven years old and has just started grade one. Due to his environment 
and his grandmother?s financial position, they had no money to buy anything but the bare 
essentials; therefore Johnny has never seen a book up until his first day at school, and has 
not obtained the skills required for reading which are usually gained in the home 
environment. However, Johnny is a hard worker and tried his best to learn to read but no 
matter how much effort he put in he did not succeed. This is due to the fact that Johnny 
shares a classroom with 89 peers and one teacher. The lessons are also given in English 
which is not Johnny?s mother tongue. Johnny?s teacher eventually realized that Johnny is 
falling behind and called his grandmother in for a meeting. The teacher thought that 
Johnny was experiencing a developmental delay, however he showed no difficulties with 
activities involving oral input. The teacher recommended that Johnny be assessed to 
determine whether he has a learning disability. The assessment was however too 
expensive and therefore did not take place.  Johnny continued to experience difficulties 
until grade four where he was assessed by a research student as part of a research 
project. The assessment results showed that Johnny met the criteria for a reading 
disorder. Johnny was then referred for the necessary help for his reading difficulty. 
 
Although this scenario was an imaginary one, situations like these occur on a daily basis. 
Many children fail academically due to reading difficulties not being identified early 
 8 
enough. In South Africa, however the situation becomes more complex considering the 
broader socio-cultural and economic context. As depicted in the imaginary scenario many 
factors influenced Johnny?s difficulty in learning, unfortunately this is not a new 
phenomenon to South Africa. South Africa?s education system has been in crisis since the 
1980?s (Hartshorne, 1992). In 1990, Macdonald reported the poor quality of reading skills 
in children attending township schools due to the past education policies of ?Bantu 
Education? and the lack of exposure to English in these areas. After 1994, 11 official 
languages were established to share the same status as English and Afrikaans, this was 
partly to address the problem of English not being a first language for many South African 
children. The Department of Education is considering the introduction of the indigenous 
languages as a medium of instruction in technikons and schools. However, for many South 
Africans today English is seen as the language of opportunity (Buthelezi, 2003). 
Resources are also very scarce i.e. like books written in English: one book is allocated to 
five children at school (Buthelezi, 2003). At home children are once again disadvantaged 
due to the lack of resources like bedtime stories in English or parents might not be literate. 
There is a lack of qualified teachers, ?South Africa needs to train enough teachers - up to 
20 000 a year - or face an education crisis? (Mtshali, 2005 p.1). The lack of teachers has 
built up from the apartheid era, when training institutions were racially segregated. Now 
however even with the transformation to democracy the situation still needs to improve. 
One hundred and two teacher training institutions were phased out limiting the number of 
trained teachers. Moreover, most of the teachers that are trained are considering moving 
overseas and 40 % of the end of year students seem to be following in their footsteps 
(Robinson, cited in Mtshali, 2005). 
 
In an attempt to address these issues, a new educational policy, Curriculum 2005 was 
implemented. This curriculum is utilized in most mainstream schooling as well as adult 
 9 
education programs. Although this move to quality education seems like something to be 
delighted about, this is not the case with many people (Buthelezi, 2003). The countless 
complaints and perplexity over the low matriculation results and pitiful pass rates of 
secondary education of pupils in South Africa, seems to stem from the difficulty in learning 
to read, as without being able to read a child cannot read to learn (Hough & Horn, 2001 
cited in Pretorius, 2002). This was evident in a study done on grade 12 English second 
language students applying to Technikons in Gauteng, where a steady decline in literacy 
levels were evident (Hough & Horn, 2001cited in Pretorius, 2002).  
 
Furthermore in 2003, the deputy minister of education Mr. Masibudi Mangena stated that 
although an emphasis is being placed on education in South Africa, for example the 
Schools Act, the National Curriculum Statements, the language in Education Policy and 
ABET policy, a clear focus on reading is still lacking (Mangena, 2003).  
 
Another major contribution to the frequency of the imaginary situation portrayed at the 
outset of this chapter is that many South African schools are not equipped with any formal 
assessment procedures for the purpose of reaching large numbers of pupils at a cost that 
is affordable. Most assessments are done individually and cost a lot of money. Another 
contributing factor is that many South African normed tests are outdated and hardly any 
new assessment tools are being developed to assist in minimizing the reading problem. 
Consequently, the current research focuses on comparing aspects of reading ability and 
intellectual functioning as a means of addressing this problem as early identification is 
considered imperative in grades one and two in order for interventions to be put into 
action. Since South Africa is said to be amidst an educational crises (Pretorius, 2002), 
research in this area will prove to be a valuable asset for teachers and educators. 
 
 10 
Another aim of this research is to determine whether there are any gender differences in 
the cognitive processes involved in reading. Previous literature relating to gender 
differences in intellectual functioning indicate a definite gap between boys and girls, with 
girls performing better in verbal tasks and boys performing better in spatial and 
mathematical tasks (Joseph, 2000; Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974 cited in Lloyd, Walsh & 
Yailagh, 2005). Nevertheless recent research indicates that girls and boys are now 
exposed to similar environments and social situations which have reduced this gap 
(Feingold, 1988 & Flynn, 1998, cited in Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008). However many 
factors are also contributing to maximizing this gap, especially in South Africa. One of 
these is the HIV/AIDS pandemic coupled with high levels of poverty. Many children are 
orphaned by parents who have died from HIV/AIDS, often leaving the burden of raising the 
family on the eldest daughter, who may sacrifice her schooling to care for her siblings, thus 
contributing to the statistics in increasing illiteracy in South Africa (Buthelezi, 2003). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 11 
Chapter Two 
 
Literature Review 
 
Literacy and its importance 
 
Learning disabilities are defined as a severe discrepancy between achievement and 
intellectual ability in many different areas of literacy (reading, writing or mathematics) such 
as oral expression; listening comprehension; written expression; reading skills; basic 
mathematic computation or reasoning. These literacy skills play a vital role in the basic 
functioning of human life and therefore will have an influence on many different stages of a 
of a child?s development. Learning disabilities not only affect a child?s ability to progress 
within the school environment, but also influence a child?s academic and future 
employment potential. This in turn will have an effect on their quality of living, satisfaction 
in their work and the resources (such as education) they can provide for their children 
(Jensen, 1996; Pretorius, 2002; Werner, 1996).  
 
Research in this area over the last 30 years has evidenced that these disabilities do exist 
and are prevalent in 15 % of children in developed countries (Gaddes, 1976 cited in 
Springer, 2007; Harris, 1998 cited in Springer, 2007; Sadock & Sadock, 2003; Wrong 
Diagnosis, April, 2005). According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ? fourth edition 
(DSM-IV), three major clusters of learning difficulties are identified. These include difficulty 
in reading, difficulty in writing and difficulty with mathematics. The more formal names for 
these three clusters of learning disabilities are Dyslexia, Dysgraphia and Dyscalculia 
respectively (Sadock & Sadock, 2003). However in the ninth edition of the Synopsis of 
 12 
Psychiatry, these difficulties are referred to as Reading Disorder, Disorder of Written 
Expression and Mathematics Disorder (Sadock & Sadock, 2003). 
 
Among the three main clusters, Reading disorders are regarded as the most common and 
detrimental type of learning difficulty (Hyde & Cohen, 1983; Stanovich, 1986). Pretorius 
(2002) regards the reading situation in South Africa as a national educational crises. She 
believes that the problems experienced by learners who have reading difficulty appear to 
widen as they progress along the academic ladder. Literacy and reading skills tend to 
become exceedingly more demanding and indispensable, not only in terms of the basic 
functioning of life but also to achieve academic success (Perie, Grigg & Donahue, 2005). 
Research shows that the ability to construct meaning during reading and to acquire, 
combine and make use of information that was read determines academic success 
(Pretorius, 2002). This is due to the fact that literacy has become a vital skill in our 
everyday lives. Read and McKay (1984, cited in Cretchley, 2000) propose that literacy 
exists on a continuum which ranges from initial literacy to technical literacy and is seen as 
a tool for survival in western based economies (Adams, 1996).  
 
Initial Literacy is the most basic form of literacy and involves the ability to read and write 
one?s name. The next level is Basic Literacy whereby one is able to read and write short, 
simple sentences based on everyday life. However in order to function in our everyday 
lives, one needs to be equipped with slightly more advanced skills such as being able to 
read, write and comprehend pieces of information on subjects that are well-known. The 
understanding of signs, labels, instructions and directions (such as using an ATM) are also 
very important to survive in one?s environment. This level is termed Survival Literacy. The 
next two levels are slightly more advanced than the previous levels. The first of these two 
is known as the Functional Literacy level involving the ability to read and write for the 
 13 
purpose of executing own self-determined objectives. Adams (1996) emphasizes this level 
by describing literacy as a window providing us with a view of the world that allows us to 
stay informed about current happenings around the world through media i.e. newspapers, 
magazines, television and internet. Lastly is the Technical Literacy level where reading, 
writing and problem solving skills are required to analyze a body of theoretical or technical 
knowledge within a specific field (Read & McKay, 1984 cited in Cretchley, 2000).  
 
Apart from reading being necessary for our basic everyday functioning, literacy is deemed 
to have a role in the economic, social and political development of a country (Baatjes & 
Aitchison, 1999). Society tends to reward individuals who are literate and delay those who 
aren?t. This is evident on not only a social level but on an economic level as well. Linda 
Macleod (cited in http://www.essaysample.com) of the National Associations Active in 
Criminal Justice reports that 65 % of people entering prisons have trouble reading and 
writing. Although this study was done in Canada, low literacy levels are a contributor to the 
problems associated with limited choices in life that may lead people into criminal activity. 
On the contrary, a person with a survival level of literacy skills is able to make more 
informed and wiser decisions thereby creating more opportunities for themselves. In a 
literacy survey done on adult prisoners in Ireland in 2001, similar results were yielded 
where it was found that a significant number of prisoners assessed possessed no literacy 
skills. Another remarkable finding in the same study was the correlation between poor 
literacy skills and particular kinds of crime (Morgan & Kett, 2003). Moats (2000) supports 
this view as well, as she states that ?individuals who are poor readers are much more likely 
than literate people to drop out of school; find their way to jail; or struggle to find and keep 
meaningful satisfying work? (p.4). 
 
 14 
Although conclusions on a linear relationship between low literacy and criminal activity 
cannot be made, as there are many other variables involved that lead a person into 
criminal activity and low literacy is only one of those variables, considerable amounts of 
research show that low literacy can be a contributing factor in criminal activity (Morgan & 
Kett, 2003).  
 
Literacy in South Africa 
 
Increasing levels of literacy and reading difficulty are a concern in all parts of the world, 
and unfortunately it is not a unique concern in South Africa. Statistics show that 861 million 
people or 20% of the adults in the world are deemed illiterate, of which 70% live in the 
Sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa, Southern and Western Asia and Arab countries 
(UNESCO). In another survey 751 702 people of the South African population were 
estimated as being Learning Disabled (Wrong Diagnosis, April 2005).  Below is a 
representation of the levels of illiteracy in South Africa separated into the different 
provinces.                                                       
 
 15 
 
Figure 1. Graph depicting illiteracy by province in South Africa 
_____________________________________________________________ 
From Kha ri Gude Mass literacy campaign (www.kharigude.co.za) 
 
Another contributing factor to illiteracy in South Africa is the fact that South Africa has 11 
official languages and society?s perceptions of literacy are influenced by language. English 
is seen by many as the language of education, power and work (Lyster, 1992; Discussions 
with adult learners at Maryvale Adult Education Centre, 2000, Cited in Taylor, 2002). In 
Figure 2 below this is clearly seen, as illiteracy is more prevalent in languages other than 
English as a mother tongue language.  
 
 16 
Figure 2. 
Graph depicting illiteracy by language. 
 
 
From Kha ri Gude Mass literacy campaign (www.kharigude.co.za) 
 
It is a widely accepted fact that the process of reading and writing is a complex one and 
should be taught initially in the mother tongue of the learner (Clifford & Kerfoot, 1992; 
Lyster, 1992; Richek, List & Lerner, 1989 cited in Taylor, 2002). Researchers state that 
there are five definitions according to which a person?s mother tongue can be determined. 
These include language of origin, which is the language that is learnt first, which is usually 
the language spoken by the parents or primary care takers in the home environment. 
Language of competence is the language that one knows best; language of function is 
the language used the most by the person; language of attitude is the language that the 
person identifies with and finally world-view is the language the person thinks and dreams 
in (Skutnabb ? Kanyas, 1983, cited in Taylor, 2002). 
 
 17 
Considering the information above and past South African policies regarding education, 
many South African adults are not proficient in the English language which has 
implications for the current situation schools are facing. Historically the need and 
importance of literacy was not clearly understood, which led many people either to oppose 
the process of learning or reading or they were denied access to education by the past 
policies associated with ?Bantu Education? (French, 1992). Now many South Africans 
prefer for their children to be educated in English, even if it is not their mother tongue. 
However with this comes a new dilemma as according to general learning theories, 
optimal learning occurs when children build on previous knowledge (Clifford & Kerfoot, 
1992; Fordham, Holland & Millican, 1995; Miller & Dollard, 1947 & Rutherford, 1987 cited 
in Taylor, 2002). If the language of instruction is different to what the child is familiar with 
then optimal learning cannot take place (Clifford & Kerfoot, 1992 cited in Taylor, 2002). 
Since many South African adults are not literate, their children may grow up without 
literacy related stimulation from the home environment. These children in turn grow up to 
be parents who cannot provide that stimulation for their children.  
 
Problems like these and the importance of literacy have been researched over the past 50 
years. The United Nations declared literacy as a human right equal to the right to adequate 
food, healthcare and housing. In addition to this, literacy is also seen as an enabling right 
through which other rights can be claimed and protected. Many South Africans are 
unaware of their legal rights and literacy can assist them in increasing their awareness to 
these rights. The United Nations Literacy Decade is declared as 2003 to 2012 (PIRLS, 
2006). 
 
Many South African projects have been set up or are in the process of being set up to 
address the issue of illiteracy. The Deputy Minister of Education is taking an active role in 
 18 
promoting reading and literacy. Mrs. Naledi Pandor, Minister of Education launched the 
Department of Education or Vodacom Masifunde Sonke Library project on Monday, 21 
November 2005, in an attempt to make seven million adults literate before the end of 
2012. All adults who had previously missed out on their schooling and those struggling to 
read and write were invited to join one of the 20 000 literacy classes, situated throughout 
South Africa (Mangena, 2003). ?Through this project the Department of Education hopes to 
revive the use of school libraries, to provide learners and educators with access to a wider 
range of information on their fingertip as part of curriculum delivery support.? (Mangena, 
2003. p.1) 
 
Projects like the Masifunde Sonke Library project and Read Education Trust have been set 
up in an attempt to create an awareness of the importance of literacy along with making 
people literate (Mangena, 2003). The extended benefits of these projects will also assist in 
achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). These goals attempt to address 
issues like poverty reduction, empowering women, eradicating HIV and AIDS and 
conserving our environment (Mangena, 2003). 
 
Risk Factors in Reading Difficulty 
 
Reading problems are found among every group and in every primary classroom (Moats, 
2000). However some children are more at risk than others for developing reading 
difficulties. The reasons for this are based on the interactions between physical and 
environmental influences. It is acknowledged that certain physiological factors such as 
cognitive deficiencies, visual impairment, hearing impairment, Attention Deficit 
Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and early language impairment may also result in reading 
 19 
difficulties. The relationship between reading and each of these factors will be briefly 
reviewed. 
 
Many factors contribute to a child being diagnosed with severe cognitive deficiencies, such 
as severe nutritional deficiency, low birthweight, fetal alcohol syndrome, lead poisoning 
and severe pathological conditions. Cognitive deficiencies place children at risk for 
achieving low reading ability (Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998). 
 
Hearing difficulty or deafness is a physical condition associated with reading difficulty. 
Chronic otitis media is an ear infection that causes hearing loss in the early years of a 
child?s life. Although research in this area is ambivalent where Wallace and Hooper (1997 
cited in Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998) found only a mild association between reading 
disorders and otitis media, there is well documented research on the negative association 
between hearing difficulty or deafness and reading (Conrad, 1979; Karchmer, 1978; 
Waters & Doehring, 1990 cited in Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998). 
 
Early Language Impairment (ELI) is a condition diagnosed in children when general 
development is delayed by the age of three years old. ELI is also an indicator for other 
conditions that are associated with reading difficulty such as hearing impairment, autism 
and neurological conditions (Aram & Hall, 1989; Bashr & Scavuzzo, 1992 cited in Snow, 
Burns & Griffin, 1998). 
 
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common comorbid disorder to reading 
difficulties. Children diagnosed with ADHD struggle from the start of formal schooling and 
research shows that the difficulties experienced with reading difficulties increase with age 
 20 
(Shaywitz, 1996; Shaywitz; Shaywitz, Pugh, Constable, Skudlarski, Fulbright, Bronen, 
Fletcher, Shankweiler, Katz & Gore, 1995). 
 
Severe visual impairments make it impossible to read text, as reading is primarily a visual 
process (Smith, 1973 cited in Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998). Even though reading can 
occur though Braille reading, both types of reading are based on the same principle 
(alphabetic principle), indicating that similar difficulties in reading can occur in both groups 
(Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998). 
 
While research in the area of neuroscience has confirmed that there is a relationship 
between reading ability and genetics (Shaywitz, 1996), the environment or context of a 
child must also be considered, as this plays a vital role in predicting reading ability. 
Environmental factors such as home environments, parental influence, parental level of 
education; school environments and socio economic status (SES) must be acknowledged. 
 
SES might not have a direct link to reading difficulties but does have an influence on the 
home environment and quality of parental influence, which will influence the level of 
stimulation from the home environment. Children who come from very deprived 
environments often don?t receive the resources like exposure to books, being read to, 
modelling of how to handle books, etc. According to Molfese, Molfese and Modgline (2001) 
oral or language skills, including reading skills are largely influenced by the educational 
stimulation received in the home (reading aloud, availability of books in the home, nature 
of family discussions, being read to frequently, and television - news) These children then 
attend school often with a lag of two years or more, thereby hindering their reading ability 
skills. A study by a speech and language therapist on the functioning levels of grade three 
 21 
learners reported that over 60 % of those tested presented with a lag in their functioning 
(Caelers, 2004 cited in Grasko, 2006).  
 
The above mentioned factors were taken into account when determining the sample for 
the current study and children who were known to possess any of these difficulties were 
excluded from the sample. It was necessary to do this to eliminate other possible 
confounding variables from having an impact on the test scores.  
 
Another very critical issue to consider is the school environment. The belief that the quality 
of education one receives influences one?s life path, was discouraged by Christopher 
Jencks and the 1966 Coleman Report (Hempenstall, 2004). However recent research has 
provided sufficient evidence to encourage this belief. In a longitudinal study it was found 
that effective teachers improved learners? performance by 50 % compared to ineffective 
teachers. Although there is general consensus that children need a good start to reading, 
many children struggle to learn to read in the first grade and as a result fall behind. These 
children then have particular difficulty catching up to their peers (Clay, 1991; Juel, 1988; 
Stanovich, 1986) and often develop a poor self esteem.   This is further supported by 
evidence from studies that show the long term negative effects of poor instruction. 
Instruction is said to play a vital role, in how children perceive themselves and are 
perceived by others (Riddick, Sterling, Farmer & Morgan, 1999).  Children with poor 
instruction within their first year of formal schooling are negatively impacted on by the 
unpleasant experience which influences their future schooling experiences (Pianta, 1990). 
Literature strongly supports the fact that in younger children there is a strong relationship 
between poor reading and self esteem, and that academic self esteem is more vulnerable 
to underachievement (Chapman, Lambourne & Silva, 1990; Trautwein, L
dtke, Kller, 
Baumert, 2006). A line in the Matthew?s Gospel reads ?for unto every one that hath shall be 
 22 
given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even 
that which he hath? (XXX: 29). It is borne from the belief that cumulative advantage in 
reading development lead to still further advantage and conversely, initial disadvantage in 
reading development become accentuated over time (Stanovich, 1986). This refers to the 
notion that learners who are strong readers will consistently become stronger reader?s 
while weak readers tending to read less and less thereby delaying and impairing their 
development of reading skills.   
 
The Matthew Effect suggests that early intervention is likely to be more effective than later 
intervention or remediation. Early intervention is effective as the gap that separates Grade 
one children likely to be successful in reading from those at risk for reading failure is 
relatively small. However, if children at risk of reading difficulties go undetected, the 
chances of them rectifying the difficulty become much more difficult if not impossible 
(Wren, 2003), and the gap between the good and poor readers widens progressively with 
each passing year. 
 
Reading Development 
 
 Reading development can however follow a smooth process if the above mentioned 
factors (physical and environmental) are absent. Reading development is believed to 
follow stages in which skills are developed and enhanced. Many theories of reading 
acquisition have been developed over the years. One of the most popular is Frith?s (1985), 
who proposed a stage model that provided a structure for reading development. In her 
model, children follow a stage like process and develop foundation skills for each 
subsequent stage. The sample group used in this study consisted of grade two learners 
 23 
that should be functioning at stage two (alphabetic) moving onto stage three (orthographic) 
of Frith?s reading stages, which will be reviewed in more detail, below. 
 
According to Frith, the reading process begins at the logographic stage. Share and Gur 
(1999) concur with this, although they refer to this as the contextual dependency stage. 
This stage is also referred to as a pre phonetic level or pre-reading stage (Ehri & 
McCormick, 1998) and usually occurs in children from the age of five onwards. Children at 
this stage read only signs and labels of well known products i.e. Coco-cola or McDonalds. 
In this stage it is said that children attend to contextual clues to identify words.  They 
therefore read only words that they may come across frequently in their environments 
(Ehri & McCormick, 1998). Words that look visually similar are often confused as no 
attention is given to the actual letters or the order of the letters (Frith, 1985 cited in Grasko, 
2006). The child learns only the visual representation of the ?logos? that they are able to 
read.  
 
Their focus however changes as they move onto the next stage and attention is given to 
features of print. Stage two of Frith?s theory is when the child uses grapheme ? phoneme 
sounding out principles to determine the word. Therefore if the child is confronted with a 
new, unfamiliar word and no graphic cues (logo: e.g. shape or colour of the CocaCola 
logo) are provided, the child will be unable to read the word (Share & Gur, 1999). In the 
beginning part of this stage children tend to make associations between certain parts of 
the word and a verbal sound of the word. For example Seymor and Elder (1986 cited in 
Harris & Coltheart, 1986) asked a child to read a list of words containing the letter k and 
the child read black for any word that contained the letter k in it, such as like, bkacl and 
pjoek. Another child read the word smaller as yellow based on the association made with 
the double l in the word yellow. However as this skill develops children are able to map the 
 24 
sounds of the letters to each letter of the word and read the word, where non words were 
impossible to read, children now read words like lon or sej. 
 
However for this shift from one stage to another to occur, the child needs some knowledge 
about the sounds of the letters. Although exposure to books and literature plays a vital role 
here, according to Moats (2000) it is not enough. Children need to be taught the 
associations between letters and the sounds they make.  
 
In order for them [children] to shift their attention from environmental cues to the 
print itself, they need to know the alphabet. Because there are so many letter 
shapes to be learnt and to be associated with meaningless arbitrary sounds, it is 
likely that acquisition requires explicit instruction and practice. It is not picked up 
simply through exposure to the letters. (Ehri, 1987, p. 11). 
 
Many researchers share the opinion that training children in phonological awareness skills 
at an early age is beneficial for beginning readers (Bryant & Bradley, 1985), as visual word 
(orthographic stage ? advanced level of reading) recognition can only occur when a child 
is able to transfer the knowledge that print represents pictures which are comprised of 
letters that, in turn, map to speech sounds. 
 
Frith?s third stage involves processes such as observing similarities in spelling patterns to 
increase sight word reading and is called the orthographic stage of reading (Frith, 1985). 
Patterns like affixes, root words, onsets, rimes or syllables facilitate decoding speed and 
accuracy, thereby increasing the sight word pool (Ehri, 1995). Less memory is also 
required as instead of having to remember many individual letters (grapheme ? 
phonemes) only smaller chunks (syllables) replace them (Ehri, 2005). 
 25 
 
Ehri (1995) influenced by Frith?s reading stages builds onto these stages and proposed a 
four stage reading model. Ehri (1995) proposed a pre-alphabetic phase in which word 
reading was done through associations made with visual features called ?cues? from the 
surrounding context. This phase is equivalent to Frith?s logographic phase, however 
according to Ehri (1995) the term logographic gave the impression that novice readers had 
already developed their skills to a level of a mature reader (Beech, 2005). In a study done 
by Masonheimer, Drum and Ehri (1984) where the word PEPSI was altered to XEPSI with 
the original background for PEPSI. The participants failed to recognize the change and 
continued to read PEPSI. This is also called visual cue reading (Ehri & Wilce, 1985). 
Children at this phase struggle to read new words when they are presented out of context 
(Mason, 1980 cited in Ehri & McCormick, 1998) as arbitrary associations are made. 
 
The shift from a pre-alphabetic to a partial alphabetic phase was assessed in 56 
kindergarten pupils. They were divided into groups according to their level of reading 
ability (prereaders, novices and vetrans). The three groups were presented with two kinds 
of word spellings: phonetic spelling of letters that represent the sounds in a word and 
visual spellings that had no correlation to the sounds of a word i.e.: the word mask was 
spelled MSK for the first group and uHo for the second. Results indicated that children in 
the beginning phases of reading depend on visual cues as they lack alphabetic knowledge 
and were more efficient in reading the visual spellings. However the children who were 
novice and vetran readers were able to use phonetics better to identify the words and were 
more efficient at phonetic spelling (Ehri & Wilce, 1985 cited in Ehri, 2005).   
 
The English language relies on an alphabetic system that represents the parts that make 
up a spoken syllable (Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998). Ehri coined the term ?phonetic cue 
 26 
reading? to characterize her second phase of reading, the partial alphabetic reading phase. 
In this phase the reader uses parts of the word, commonly the first and the last letters, in 
an attempt to recognize the word. Therefore the visual appearance of the word and some 
alphabetical knowledge enhance the efforts of pronouncing a word (Beech, 2005). Further 
studies done by Stuart, Masterson and Dixon (2000 cited in Beech, 2005) in determining 
the effect of visual memory as opposed to alphabetic or phonological knowledge indicated 
that phonological knowledge is a stronger tool in helping readers to remember and identify 
words. Five year olds were pre-screened to determine their level of alphabetic knowledge. 
The children were then exposed to words and re-screened. The findings showed that the 
children with phonological or alphabetical knowledge performed better than those without it 
and the children without phonological knowledge relied on their visual memory skills to 
remember and identify words. Previous studies done in this area concur with this research 
(Ehri & Wilce, 1985 & Mason, 1980 cited in Ehri & McCormick, 1998). 
 
Ehri?s third stage is called the full alphabetic stage, where the reader is able to map 
grapheme to phonemes and use these principles to sound out words. The English 
language is represented by the alphabetic system, where units represented graphically by 
letters are abstract and meaningless. For example, the sounds that represent the word 
?mat? are meaningless in isolation, except for the ?a? which can represent a meaningful 
word on its own. However in order to make the ?m? or the ?t? meaningful or pronounceable, 
a vowel needs to be added (Daniels & Bright, 1996). Therefore in the alphabetic stage, the 
child learns how to map the sounds on the corresponding letters. 
 
This is also a stage which lays the foundation for skilled reading (Ehri & McCormick, 1998) 
as children at this level are moving toward sight word reading over decoding letters 
(Beech, 2005). They begin by decoding words very slowly as they match each letter to the 
 27 
corresponding sound and blend the sounds to identify the word. However this process 
speeds up as the child has more reading experience. The frequently encountered words 
are captured in a sight word pool and recognized and eventually are identified immediately 
without decoding the word (LaBerge & Samuels, 1974 cited in Ehri, 2005). Sight words are 
referred to words that have sometimes been read as little as four times and which no 
longer need to be sounded out (Reitsma, 1983). Studies done to determine the benefits of 
sight word reading were conducted using Stroop tasks. For example a card may have the 
word blue printed in red ink, or the word yellow coloured in purple. Readers are asked to 
identify the colour and ignore the words. Children in Grade one have shown to be efficient 
in these tasks (Guttentag & Haith, 1978 cited in Ehri, 2005) as their reading skills are not 
yet automatised to the point that the coloured ink and colour name can interfere with each 
other. 
 
This is the main stage that differentiates Ehri?s and Frith?s theories. Ehri?s theory is a more 
fine grained developmental theory, where Ehri split Frith?s alphabetic stage into two parts, 
namely the partial alphabetic and the full alphabetic phase. Ehri also presents this 
progression gradually using the term phases and not so clearly defined like Frith using the 
term stages. 
 
Ehri?s fourth stage, the consolidated alphabetic phase, is the same as Frith?s orthographic 
stage. This stage involves reading as depicted in the third phase; however speed and 
accuracy are highly developed. When a child is confronted with an unfamiliar word, they 
generally regress back to the third phase. 
 
A very important concept used in Ehri?s phases of reading is the term ?phase? as opposed 
to ?stage?. The word phase proposes that progression occurs to the point of atomaticity, 
 28 
and that each phase is not a prerequisite for the next. She does this to introduce flexibility 
in the process of reading (Ehri, 2002 cited in Beech, 2005; Ehri, 2005). This is further 
supported by Stuart and Coltheart?s (1988) studies, which found that some children do not 
pass through the pre-alphabetic phase (Frith?s logographic stage). She also suggests that 
the pre-alphabetic stage does not contribute to later reading skills (Ehri, 2002 cited in 
Beech, 2005; Ehri, 2005).  
 
Assessment of reading 
 
There is widespread agreement that early identification and thereafter, intervention, are 
required to prevent long term learning disorders (Bos, Mather, Friedman, Narr & Babur, 
1999; Coyne, Kame?enui & Simmons, 2001; Foorman, Breier, & Fletcher, 2003; 
Schatschneider, Fletcher, Francis, Carlson, & Foorman, 2004 cited in Simmons, Coyne, 
Kwok, McDonagh, Harn, & Kaneenui, 2008). Smith (cited in Phillips, Norris, Osmond & 
Maynard, 2002) reported that children carry over their strengths or weakness in reading 
ability to later grades. For example, in one of his studies it was found that 71 % of children 
who performed poorly in assessments in preschool, performed poorly in grade 3 as well, 
and 93 % of children who performed well in assessments in preschool continued to 
perform well five years later. However, research based on Response to Intervention (RTI) 
has shown that reading achievement is alterable through instruction, assessment and 
remediation thereby assisting those children who perform poorly preventing them from 
experiencing reading difficulties later on (Coleman, Buysse, & Neitzel, 2006; Denton, 
Fletcher, Anthony, & Francis, 2006; National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, 
2005 cited in Simmons, Coyne, Kwok, McDonagh, Harn, Kameenui, 2008). South African 
research shows that after 1994, education policies adopted this belief as well by adopting 
inventive strategies to assist students by identifying those at risk through assessments and 
 29 
effective strategies (Vandeyar, 2005). In order to do this, teachers need to gauge the level 
at which difficulties exist with the help of assessments, so that they can deliver instruction 
based on those assessments (Menzies, Mhduvir, Lewis, 2008).  The Reading First 
Assessment Committee (RFAC) developed a set of criteria against which reading 
assessments of children from kindergarten up to grade three can be evaluated (Kameenui, 
Francis, Fuch, Good, O?Conner & Simmons, 2002 cited in Kammeenui, Fuch, Francis, 
Good, O?Conner, Simmons, Tindal & Torgesen, 2006). This raises the importance of 
reading assessment effectiveness in the primary grades.  
 
The first reading assessment was developed by Mr. P.B. Ballard in 1914, and resulted in 
widespread development of tests in the field of educational psychology. Although many 
psychologists were very sceptical about the use of such tests (Gipps & Murphy, 1994) 
many resorted to using them in order to identify children at risk of reading failure and assist 
them in becoming successful readers. The Neale Analysis of Reading (Neale) is a 
standardized reading assessment tool, revised in 1989. The Neale-R was designed to 
measure accuracy, comprehension and rate of reading of children between the ages of 6 
years and 12 years 11 months. The Neale-R can also be used with special needs students 
through to adult level. Together with the quantitative information, the Neale-R also allows 
for the diagnostic observations of reading behaviour. It takes approximately 20 minutes to 
administer. The Neale-R was used to assess reading ability in the current sample and was 
chosen based on its assessment of multifaceted skills of reading.   
 
Another key indicator in assessing reading performance is IQ scores in addition to 
measures of reading ability. In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ? Fourth Edition 
(DSM-IV), reading disorders are determined using IQ scores. Reading disorders in the 
DSM-IV are defined ?as reading achievement below the expected level for a child?s age, 
 30 
education, and intelligence, with the impairment interfering significantly with academic 
success or the daily activities that involve reading? (Sadock & Sadock, 2003.  p.1180).  
 
Historically, IQ tests have been widely used to determine a child's aptitude for learning or 
their potential for acquiring academic skills. Such thinking about IQ was characterized by 
Burt (1937), who stated that "capacity must obviously limit content. It is impossible for a 
pint jug to hold more than a pint of milk and it is equally impossible for a child's educational 
attainment to rise higher than his educable capacity" (p. 477). In other words, IQ sets an 
upper limit on a child's learning potential. Reading ability is compared to measures of 
general intelligence as measured by IQ tests when determining reading disorders. Initially 
research validated the use of intelligence tests as predictors of academic achievement 
(Kubiszyn, Meyer, Finn, Eyde, Kay, Moreland, Dies & Eisman, 2000; Lubinski, 2000 cited 
in Watkins, Glutting & Lei, 2007) thereby increasing the popularity of intelligence tests 
being used in child assessments each year (Kamphaus, Petoskey & Rowe, 2000; Sattler, 
2001 cited in Watkins, Glutting & Lei, 2007). There has been however a subsequent 
decrease in the use of intelligence tests in assessments as many psychologists view them 
as unreliable and invalid measures in predicting academic achievement (Fiorello, Hale, 
McGrath, Ryan & Quinn, 2002; Hale, Fiorello, Bertin & Sherman, 2003 cited in Watkins, 
Glutting & Lei, 2007). 
 
Jensen (1980) reviewed literature on the relationship between age and intelligence scores 
and found that in America the correlations between intelligence and school achievement 
fell within the range of 0.6 to 0.7 for elementary grades, 0.5 to 0.6 for high schools, 0.4 to 
0.5 for college students and 0.3 to 0.4 for graduate schools, indicating that the correlation 
between intelligence and reading is more significant with children in the younger grades. 
Although overall intelligence scores has been found to have some correlation with reading 
 31 
scores (Leppanen, Niemi, Aunola, & Nurmi, 2004; Robinson & Hanekom, 1994 cited in 
Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008) other studies have shown verbal IQ to have a stronger 
correlation with reading ability than nonverbal IQ. More specifically, certain verbal skills like 
abstract verbal conceptualization (Adams, 1996), working memory (Baddeley, 2003), 
classification (Adams, 1996; Arlin, 1981) and comprehension (Stothard & Hulme, 1996). 
These skills are closely related to reading ability. 
 
In a recent study by D?Angiulli and Siegel (2003), one hundred and forty-three children 
aged between 6 and 16 years old who were said to have reading or arithmetic difficulties 
were assessed in an attempt to determine if the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children ? 
Revised (WISC-R) could predict patterns of performance in children with Learning 
Disabilties. The results portrayed a poor correlation between complete IQ scores and 
reading ability. Stage, Abbott, Jenkins and Berninger (2003) concur with previous 
research, that global IQ scores don?t show a significant correlation with reading ability and 
that they are not the best predictors of reading ability. However studies do propose profiles 
of performance on IQ tests, especially within the verbal subtests of the WISC-R, as a 
useful tool for identifying children with learning difficulties (D?Angiulli & Siegel, 2003). More 
specifically, findings showed that the language components consisting of the Similarities 
and Vocabulary subtests, attention and memory subtests were significantly related to 
reading difficulty using the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT). However, the 
strongest correlations were found between the memory or attention factor, namely 
Arithmetic, Digit Span and Coding subtests and reading ability. 
 
Although South African research with regards to the relationship between scholastic 
achievement and intelligence is limited, the few studies using South African intelligence 
tests do show significant correlations with reading ability. The Verbal and NonVerbal 
 32 
Sclaes of the Junior South African Intelligence Scale (JSAIS) have significantly predicted 
reading success at school (Robinson & Hanekom, 1994 cited in Cockcroft & Blackburn, 
2008). Similarly with the Senior South African Intelligence Scale ? Revised (SSAIS-R) the 
Verbal Scale was found to be a more significant predictor of academic success than the 
Non-Verbal Scale (Van Eeden, 1991).  Apart from certain of the subtests not having any 
statistical correlation with reading, it is also long and expensive to conduct a complete IQ 
test. It therefore becomes impractical to conduct this research using a complete 
intelligence test, as one the aims of reading research, in general, are for interventions to 
be accessible to those that usually can?t afford it.  
 
Cockcroft and Blackburn (2008) were interested in whether specific cognitive abilities 
contribute to the process of learning to read and conducted a study to determine whether 
subtests of the SSAIS-R could predict reading ability. They used 64 pupils from a private 
school in Gauteng of which 32 were girls and 32 were boys. The following subtests of the 
SSAIS-R test were administered to determine the relationship between different cognitive 
functions and reading: Vocabulary, Similarities, Story Memory and Coding. The 
Vocabulary subtest in the SSAIS-R requires a child to select from a series of pictures, that 
one which matches a spoken word, thereby assessing receptive language, verbal 
intelligence, and verbal learning ability. In the Similarities subtest, the child is expected to 
verbalize the commonality between spoken words, thereby evaluating the ability to make 
associations and form concepts, generalize, categorize and summarize information and 
grasp the concept of likeness. The story memory subtest involves a short passage read 
aloud to the child and he/she must attempt to recall as many details of the story as 
possible, thereby assessing attention span, sequencing, attention and short term memory. 
For the Coding subtest, the child is given a key to match symbols to a random set of 
numbers within a time limit, in doing so measuring visual-associative learning ability, 
 33 
processing speed and visual tracking and scanning (Foxcroft & Roodt, 2005; Van Eeden, 
1991). Results yielded moderate significant correlations for the Vocabulary, Similarities 
and Story Memory subtests of the SSAIS-R and the Neale-R. No significant correlations 
were found with the Coding subtest. 
 
As stated earlier intelligence tests that have shown patterns of correlation between reading 
and intelligence are the Wechsler tests (D?Angiulli & Siegel, 2003; Mosley, 1980). The 
Wechsler intelligence tests have been developed as a result of the evolution of the social 
environment throughout the past century.  The Wechsler tests have been frequently 
updated over the last 60 years incorporating new research and advance in the field of 
intellectual assessment. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children ? Fourth Edition 
(WISC-IV) continues this trend from the WISC-III. The WISC-IV was developed in 2003, 
and is a commonly used assessment tool in the screening of children. Using an 
assessment tool that is commonly used will ensure the identification of children with 
reading difficulties without having to conduct an extra reading assessment, which are 
expensive to conduct and therefore avoided. If a similar result as found in Cockcroft and 
Blackburn?s (2008) study can be found with a more recent and frequently used test, 
reading difficulties could be identified at early stage of the child?s academic career. Even 
though this will not eliminate the reading problem in South Africa, it would help with the 
early identification of children at risk for reading difficulties.  The WISC-IV differs slightly 
from the SSAIS-R used by Cockcroft and Blackburn (2008). The WISC-IV consists of 15 
subtests and 4 indexes that yield results on a Verbal, Nonverbal and Full Scale IQ scores. 
The subtests are Vocabulary, Similarities, Comprehension, Information, Word Reasoning, 
Arithmetic, Cancellation, Letter-number sequencing, Coding, Picture Completion, Block 
Design, Digit Span, Matrix Reasoning, Cancellation, Picture Concepts. Based on the 
positive correlations found in Cockcroft and Blackburn?s (2008) study, the Vocabulary, 
 34 
Similarities and memory (Story Memory) tests of the WISC-IV were chosen as some of the 
tests administered in this study. 
 
Vocabulary is seen to have a significant relationship to reading (Cockcroft & Blackburn, 
2008; Mosely, 1980; Muter, Hulme, Snowling & Stevenson, 2004) in children and adults 
(Carrol, 1993). The Vocabulary subtest, which involves giving definitions to words read 
aloud to the best of their ability. It assesses the cognitive skills of receptive language, 
verbal intelligence and verbal learning ability. Vocabulary is believed to be acquired from 
the second year onward (Bates, Bretherton, Snyder, Beeghly, Shore, McNew, Carlson, 
Williamson & Garrison, 1988 cited in Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998), and continues to 
increase through the preschool and school years. Further Stanovich (1986) suggested that 
children with limited vocabularies tend to read less and as a result this hinders their 
vocabulary development which disrupts further growth in reading ability (Matthew Effect). 
Reading is a receptive skill, which is why it is strongly believed that exposure to the 
spoken language is where reading begins. Scarborough (1990) observed that children with 
poor receptive vocabulary skills at the age of three years displayed reading disabilities 
later on.   
 
 It is estimated that children acquire approximately seven words per day (2, 700 ? 3, 000 
words per annum) (Just & Carpenter, 1987; Nagy & Herman, 1987; Smith, 1941). Beck 
and McKeown (1991) agree with the above. However they point out that it may be more 
appropriate to say that children become more aware of seven words per day, as the 
process for acquiring a new word into the vocabulary of a child is a much longer learning 
process than just identifying a word. Landauer and Dumais (1997) support the suggestion 
of Beck and McKeown (1991) by stating that exposure to new words alter the preexisting 
semantic relationships among the words in the child?s vocabulary. The home environment 
 35 
therefore plays an important role in growing a child?s vocabulary. Individual differences 
have also been shown to be reliably related to demographics. For example, one study 
found that first graders from higher-income backgrounds had about double the vocabulary 
size of those from lower-income ones (Graves & Slater,1987; Hart & Risley, 1995). This is 
depicted in the table below. 
 
Table 1.  
 
Exposure to quality and quantity of words according to the different Socio Economic 
Classes. 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
Actual Difference in Quantity of Words 
In a typical hour, the average child would hear: 
Welfare                                      616 words 
Working Class                           1, 251 words 
Professional                              2, 153 words 
Actual Difference in Quality of Words Heard: 
Professional                              32 affirmations, 5 prohibitions 
Working Class                          12 affirmations, 7 prohibitions 
Welfare                                     5 affirmations, 11 prohibitions 
________________________________________________________________ 
From Hart, B., & Risley, R. T. (1995). Meaningful differences in everyday experience of 
young American children. Baltimore: Pual H. Brookes. 
 
Literature supports the fact that vocabulary growth is evident from a young age if 
comprehension skills and exposure to literacy are constant. However, the rate of growth is 
 36 
variable in individual children (Beck & McKeown, 1991; Nagy & Anderson, 1984). This 
makes attempts that have aimed to measure the size of children?s vocabulary very difficult 
due to the actual definition of vocabulary (for example, knowing the meaning of a word) 
and the method adopted to measure this (Beck & McKeown, 1991; Nagy & Anderson, 
1984). It has been argued that to be able to measure vocabulary the source of words that 
should be used is important. For example if words from a dictionary are to be used, then it 
is important to consider the type of items selected and whether categories such as proper 
names, technical terms or scientific names should be used. Further to measure the size of 
vocabulary it is important to consider the theory of relatedness of words. For example the 
American Heritage School Dictionary gives the words meekness and meekly the same 
definition as meek. Thorndike (1921 cited in Nagy & Anderson, 1984) grouped adverbs 
ending in ?ly under their base forms (i.e.: sad, sadly). This creates difficulty in determining 
what should be included in an assessment of vocabulary. The SSAIS-R measures 
receptive Vocabulary by using pictures as a description of the oral word given, compared 
to the Vocabulary subtest in the WISC-IV which measures expressive vocabulary by 
asking children for definitions of certain words. On the whole though, the cognitive skills 
measured by the SSAIS-R, are similar to those measured by the WISC-IV namely, 
receptive language, verbal intelligence and verbal learning ability.  
 
 Cockcroft and Blackburn (2008), in their study using the SSAIS-R and the Neale Analysis 
of Reading - Revised (NEALE - R) to analyze the same relationships as assessed in this 
study, found the Vocabulary subtest of the SSAIS-R correlated significantly with all 
components of the Neale-R.  Stothard and Hulme (1996) further suggest that high verbal 
abilities facilitate vocabulary learning from context, so that children with high verbal ability 
know more words to begin with, can read them, and when they encounter unknown words 
 37 
in their reading, can also learn from them. The Vocabulary subtest assesses a child?s fund 
of knowledge thereby determining their verbal abilities (Wechsler, 2003). 
 
The Similarities subtest of the WISC-IV involves orally presenting two words that represent 
common objects or concepts and the child must describe how these two objects are 
similar. It taps into the cognitive abilities of making associations and forming concepts of 
likeness, which match those skills measured on the Similarities subtest of the SSAIS-R. 
 
Analogies require identification of similarities between words or mapping letters to sounds. 
The ability to abstract similarities and to organize them meaningfully is a valuable skill 
needed for reading, especially when reading words that have similar strings of letters in 
them and when reading unfamiliar or nonsense words (Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008). It 
has already been determined that a child begins to read long before formal schooling 
commences (Scarborough, 2001). For instance at the age of three, most children 
recognize that golden arches ?stand for? MacDonald?s (Moats, 2000). Frith and Ehri refer 
to this as the logographic stage. Goswami (1988) propose that beginner readers from the 
age of five years old can use analogies to read words. For example the word ?whale? can 
be read by identifying similarities between it and different parts of the words ?when? and 
?sale? (Das, Parilla & Papadopoulos, 2000 cited in Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008). This is 
further supported by Goswami (1988) who conducted an experiment where children were 
taught new words like beak and were told that this would provide a clue to help identify the 
words that followed (namely, peak, weak). In most stages of reading, analogies are used 
to assist in identifying words i.e.: in the pre-alphabetic phase children draw analogies with 
visual representations. In the partial alphabetic phase, analogies are made with certain 
parts of a word as well as mapping sounds to certain letters. This becomes more evident 
in the third phase where children decode words by identifying the sounds of letters and 
 38 
blending them to identify the words. Thereafter analogies are made to chunks of words to 
identify new words. Forming connections allows readers to remember how to read words 
with conventional sounds and also allows connections to be made for words that are 
spelled irregularly (Ehri & McCormick, 1998). Correct decoding of words will also enhance 
rate of reading, thereby increasing comprehension (D?Angiulli & Siegel, 2003). 
 
Scarborough (2001) in analyzing correlations between predictor variables and later 
reading scores measured the concept of association in children as one of her predictor 
variables. Her study divided the predictor variables into three categories: print related 
knowledge, oral language abilities and non verbal abilities. Findings showed a significant 
correlation to print related measures followed by oral and nonverbal abilities. Her study 
also showed that later prediction of reading could be improved by combining print related 
and oral language abilities. This suggests that children are able to make abstract 
associations from a very young age. However these are not consistent across all contexts.  
 
When a child is able to make the association that the golden arches stand for 
MacDonald?s, they are utilizing the skill of association as measured in the similarities 
subtest. As evidenced in the discussion above, children are able to make associations by 
the age of 3-year-old. However they are not able to apply these across all contexts and 
domains without specific practice. This skill needs to be taught through formal teaching 
(Frith, 1985). Even though the content of associations in the subtest is different to the ones 
required for reading, it is the underlying skill of forming concepts of likeness that is being 
measured in the Similarities subtest. Other skills that are assessed with this subtest are 
auditory comprehension, memory, verbal expression and the child?s ability to differentiate 
between essential and non-essential features (Wechsler, 2003). 
 
 39 
Concept formation is another very critical skill implicated in reading and reading 
comprehension (Das, Parilla & Papadopoulos, 2000 cited in Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008). 
The skills needed for concept formation are also tapped by the Similarities subtest of the 
WISC-IV. Concepts are believed to be acquired through the classical principles of 
association which are contiguity, recency, frequency, and similarity (Adams, 1996). 
 
The memory subtest in the WISC-IV is the Digit Span Subtest. This subtest requires the 
child to repeat a sequence of numbers which are orally presented to. This is called digits 
forwards. This subtest includes a second part as well involving a series of numbers orally 
presented which the child needs to repeat in reverse sequence. This is called digits 
backwards. The aim of this subtest is to measure auditory short-term memory, sequencing 
skills, attention and concentration (Foxcroft & Roodt, 2005; Wechsler, 2003). All of these 
skills are important in the process of reading as a child needs to have the skill of memory 
to recall not only what was read but also to remember the sound each letter makes. Digit 
Span is a subtest that measures working memory ability which is a vital skill for reading 
(Gathercole, Service, Hitch, Adams & Martin, 1997; Swanson & Howell, 2001 cited in 
Georgiou, Das & Hayward, 2008). 
  
Another skill said to play a vital role in the process of reading is auditory sequential 
memory (ASM) (Hirshoren, 1969; Kirk, 1968; Rugel, 1974 cited in Klein & Schwartz, 1979). 
Studies done in this area have shown that ASM differentiates between good and poor 
readers (Senf & Freundall, 1971 cited in Klein & Schwartz, 1979) as studies have shown 
deficits in sequential memory and attention skills in children with reading difficulty 
(Bannatyne, 1971; Bannatyne, 1974; Rugel, 1974 cited in Klein & Schwartz, 1979). From 
the WISC-R subtests, Digit Span subtest requires auditory sequential memory. Linked very 
closely to auditory sequential memory skills is attention to detail. Literature indicates that 
 40 
the ability to store information in a correctly ordered sequence is fundamental to reading 
ability (Das, Parilla, Papadopoulos, 2000 cited in Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008; Savage, 
Cornish, Manly & Hollis, 2006). Although the majority of the literature points to sequential 
memory skills contributing to reading and comprehension in particular, some studies show 
that less skilled and good comprehenders share the same ability to repeat back sentences 
and short stories (Oakhill, Cain & Bryant, 2003). 
 
Bowers, Steffy and Tate (1988) identified short-term memory as one of the abilities that 
was predictive of reading ability. Poor short-term memory was also associated with lower 
verbal intelligence. Lower verbal intelligence refers to the very basic, foundational skills 
that are crucial in developing skilled reading (Jorm & Share, 1983; LaBerge & Samuels, 
1974; Perfetti, 1985). Short term memory would be expected to play a role in both reading 
comprehension as well as decoding. For instance, if a child experiences difficulty decoding 
words, then their short-term memory may become overloaded and their ability to 
understand and remember what has been read may be affected (Shankweiler, 1989). In a 
previous study it was found that skilled and less-skilled comprehension is not differentiated 
by performance on traditional tests of passive short-term memory (e.g., digit span and 
word span) (Oakhill, Yuill, & Parkin, 2005), but that poor comprehension is linked to 
difficulties with working memory tasks (i.e., memory tasks that require them to switch 
between storage and processing functions), which is measured by the Digits Span 
(backward) subtest.  
 
Seymour and Elder (1985 cited in Harris & Coltheart, 1986) conducted numerous studies 
with children in the first phase of reading. These studies indicate that children are able to 
read limited words based on the visual pattern of the word. For example Frith?s term to 
describe this phase is logographic which come from the idea that children recognizing 
 41 
popular ?logo?s? like McDonalds and CocaCola. However further studies done by Seymour 
and Elder (1985 cited in Harris & Coltheart, 1986) indicate that the above is not always 
true. Children are able to read words recognizing particular sequencing of letters, which 
goes beyond recognizing overall shapes or colours. 
  
The WISC-IV also provides four index scores. The four index scores consist of the Verbal 
Comprehension Index (VCI), the Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI), the Working Memory 
Index (WMI) and the Processing Speed Index (PSI). The Verbal Comprehension Index is 
composed of subtests measuring verbal abilities utilizing reasoning, comprehension, and 
conceptualization, and the Perceptual Reasoning Index is composed of subtests 
measuring perceptual reasoning and organization. The Working Memory Index is 
composed of subtests measuring attention, concentration, and memory, and the 
Processing Speed Index is composed of subtests measuring the speed of mental and 
grapho-motor processing (Wechsler, 2003). The Verbal Comprehension Index and 
Working Memory Index show the strongest correlation with reading ability. 
 
Working Memory has proved to be one of the major contributors to reading comprehension 
(Alloway, Gathercole, Willis & Adams, 2005; Baddeley, 1986; Daneman & Carpenter, 
1980; Engle, Cantor & Carullo, 1992; Friedman & Miyake, 2004; Gathercole, Brown & 
Pickering, 2003; Swanson & Howell, 2001 cited in Georgiou, Das & Hayward, 2008). It is 
defined as information that is stored in memory for a short period of time that is 
manipulated in the same way, hence the name working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974; 
Gathercole, 2007 cited in Georgiou, Das & Hayward, 2008). This concept has evolved 
from the unitary term known as short-term memory (Baddeley, 1992) and the terms are 
sometimes used interchangeably. Divisions between long and short term memory have 
been proposed as far back as the 1960?s. Concepts of short term memory originally 
 42 
included sensory registers and storage components for incoming information and shared 
close links with long term memory (Baddeley, 2003). This is an extremely important skill 
used in reading. For the past 80 years, research has reiterated the fact that the learning of 
new material is aided by knowledge already acquired (James, 1899; James, 1958 cited in 
Kamil, Mosenthal, Pearson & Barr, 2000), since ?he [the child] interprets the new by 
means of the old concept? (Laing, 1903. p. 27). 
 
According to Pickering (2001) four components have been implicated in the working 
memory model: Phonological Loop, Visuospatial Sketchpad, Episodic Buffer and Central 
Executive. 
 
Research has shown that the phonological loop is the most closely related to reading as it 
is based on speech information. The phonological loop is made up of two sub 
components: a phonological store and an articulatory rehearsal component process. The 
function of the phonological store is the holding of speech-based information (Baddeley, 
1990) and the articulatory rehearsal component responsible for reviving memory traces 
(Baddeley, 1990). Cognitive tasks that make use of the phonological loop when learning to 
read are language comprehension and vocabulary acquisition The visuospatial sketchpad 
is responsible for maintaining nonverbal information (such as colours, shapes, tastes, etc). 
The episodic buffer is a recent concept that was added on by Baddeley in 2000, and is 
said to be ?responsible for the integration of cognitive vents across different representation 
domains? (Gathercole, 2007, p.234 cited in Georgiou, Das & Hayward, 2008). The central 
executive is said to be responsible for the controlling cognitive processes. Swanson and 
Alexander (1997, cited in Georgiou, Das & Hayward, 2008) propose working memory to 
play a vital role in word reading and reading comprehension. This was further supported 
 43 
by later studies done in this area (Swanson, 2000; Swanson & Howell, 2001 cited in 
Georgiou, Das & Hayward, 2008). 
 
Working memory is measured in the current study by means of the Digit Span subtest and 
is said to be a natural processing-dependent ability,  not associated with socio-economic 
factors, previous education or primary caregiver?s level of education (Gathercole & 
Pickering, 2002), therefore making it a more culture-free, fluid cognitive skill measure 
(Campbell, Dollaghan, Needleman, & Janosky, 1997).  
 
Other Factors that impact on reading development  
 
In addition to the cognitive factors discussed, there are a multitude of other factors that 
contribute to reading failure (Ramus, in press). A few of these are highlighted below:  
 
Phonological Awareness 
Among the most prevalent and well researched of the factors that contribute to the 
development of reading is phonological awareness (Muter, Hulme, Snowling & Stevenson, 
2004; Parrila, Kirby & McQuarrie, 2004; Rack, Snowling & Olson, 1992; Siegel, 1993; 
Siegel & Faux, 1989; Siegel & Ryan, 1988; Snowling, 1980; Stanovich, 1988). 
Phonological awareness, and in particular phonemic awareness, is the understanding of 
the basic alphabetic principle and requires an awareness of the spoken language. The 
National Research Council concurs with Snow, Burns and Griffin?s (1998) definition in 
distinguishing phonological awareness from phonemic awareness: 
The term phonological awareness refers to a general appreciation of the sounds of 
speech as distinct from their meaning. When that insight includes an understanding 
 44 
that words can he divided into a sequence of phonemes, this finer-grained 
sensitivity is termed phonemic awareness. (Snow, Burns, & Griffin, 1998, p. 51) 
Therefore phonemic awareness is a component of phonological awareness. The 
awareness of the phonological structure of language and speech gradually develops from 
tasks initially involving a child to become aware that speech or language can be broken 
down into smaller parts like words. Tasks used to achieve this are, rhyme songs and 
segmentation of sentences.  More complex tasks would follow a process of being able to 
decode or isolate the phonemes of a word to combining the phonemes of a word to 
manipulating the phonemes in a word.  The most complex level is manipulating phonemes 
which involve adding, subtracting and substituting the phonemes in a word to create new 
words, thereby mapping the sounds each letter makes (Taylor, 2002).  
 
It has been suggested that phonological awareness precedes the acquisition of reading. 
Alternatively, learning to read may be a prerequisite for becoming aware of the 
phonological structure of words. Another commonly believed hypothesis and that which is 
supported by many is that the relationship is reciprocal where early phonographic 
awareness assists insight into the alphabetic code, which in turn supplements the level of 
phonological awareness (Bentin, Hammer, Cahan 1991; Perfetti, Beck, Bell and Hughes, 
1987; Wimmer, Landerl, Linortner & Hummer, 1991). Furthermore, Ehri (1991) identified 
phonological processing as a pre-requisite for reading, without which the acquisition of 
reading skills becomes very difficult. He also proposed that children with phonological 
ability acquire reading skills faster than children without it. Calfee, Chapman and Venezky 
(1972), support the notion of phonological awareness developing at the same age that the 
reading is taught. The study was conducted on five and a half year old learner?s who were 
questioned on phonological awareness. For example: a) whether two words sounded the 
same at the end and b) to provide a word that rhymes with the presented word. These 
 45 
children were able to do this successfully 39% of the time suggesting that most had limited 
phonological awareness. It is evident that phonological skills play a vital role in reading 
acquisition. 
 
Comprehension 
 
The core purpose of reading is to obtain meaning from what is read, be it basic messages 
like directions or professional reading for academic purposes. Reading words without 
comprehending what the words mean, is not really reading. Previously, comprehension as 
a reading skill was not given much importance and was assumed to be present if 
pronunciation was correct. However present day comprehension tests place an emphasis 
on understanding. The Word Reasoning subtest from the WISC-IV measures the ability to 
identify the common concept being described in a series of clues, which measures 
cognitive logical thinking ability, verbal comprehension and ability to synthesize different 
types of information and generate alternative concepts.  The tasks on this subtest are 
similar to the tasks measured on the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) 
(Delis, Kaplan & Kramer, 2001 cited in Wechsler, 2003), the Riddles subtest of the K-ABC 
and cloze tasks. Verbal reasoning skills such as verbal comprehension, analogical and 
general reasoning ability, verbal abstraction, domain knowledge, the ability to integrate 
and synthesize different types of information, and the ability to generate alternative 
concepts are measured (Ackerman, Beier & Bowen, 2000; Alexander & Kulikowich, 1991; 
Delis, Kaplan, Kramer, 2001; DeSanti, 1989; McKenne & Layton, 1990; Newstead, 
Thompson & Handley, 2002; Ridgeway, 1995 cited in Wechsler, 2003). 
 
Yuill (1996 cited in Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998) used the method of riddles to assess 
comprehension. The participants in his study were aged between seven and eight years 
 46 
old and were divided into two groups, experimental and control. The experimental group 
was exposed to riddles to assess multiple interpretations and the control group read 
amusing texts focusing on the sub-lexical awareness rather than meta-comprehension 
skills. Findings showed that the experiment group performed better in tasks of 
comprehension on a post-test done after two months. 
 
The reason this subtest was added in this study, was to determine if a relationship 
between the subtest and the Comprehension subtest on the Neale-R due to the fact that 
both seem to tap similar skills. 
 
Vocabulary is seen as a supplement to comprehension as reading written text places an 
emphasis on vocabulary knowledge (Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998). For example, if a 
beginner reader comes across the word ?pig? and attempts to identify it by decoding the 
word ?p / i / g?, they recognize the word more easily as a word they have heard or read 
before. Understanding what the word means facilitates meaning of what is being read. 
Without knowing what the word ?pig? means, the child won?t be able to understand the 
meaning of a simple sentence like ?the pig has very smooth skin?. Attention is also aids 
comprehension and allows the child to decode words correctly. Skills in attention are vital 
to reading in many different phases of the reading process, especially when discriminating 
letters in words that look very similar (e.g., q ? p and d ? b), and when reading unfamiliar 
or nonsense words (Das, Parilla & Papadopoulos, 2000 cited in Cockcroft & Blackburn, 
2008) . Attention skills are also required as a supplement to sequential skills which are 
used in decoding words. It is important to note that not all research supports vocabulary 
skills in comprehension (Ehrlich & Remond, 1997; Oakhill, Cain & Yuill, 1998; Stothard & 
Hulme, 1992). 
 
 47 
Decoding skills also influence comprehension of what is read. D? Angiulli and Siegel (2003) 
in their attempt to determine the pattern of performance in children with learning disabilities 
found that children struggling to decode single words lead to difficulty in understanding the 
sentences they were trying to read. This is probably due to the slow pace at which words 
are read, which creates long breaks between decoding each word, thereby missing the 
understanding of what was read. 
 
The Comprehension subtest of the WISC-IV was also included in the current study, even 
though pure comprehension is not being assessed. Instead, this subtest measures social 
learning or comprehension. Although less attention in literature has been placed on social 
learning (Borgatti & Cross, 2003), a growing body of literature has focused on this topic as 
a cognitive process in the last 30 years (Argyris & Schon, 1978; Draft & Weick, 1984). 
Borgatti and Cross (2003) view social interaction as a vehicle for knowledge acquisition 
and acknowledge the importance of social relationships. Consistent with their views, 
Granoveter (1973) and Burt (1992) agree that the creation of knowledge as a social 
process is very valuable. However a person?s ability to grasp and remember new concepts 
and words strongly depends on their background knowledge (Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998) 
which is usually dependent on a person?s vocabulary knowledge (Robbins & Ehri, 1994 
cited in Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998).In the Comprehension subtest of the WISC-I V, the 
child is questioned about understanding of general principles regarding social behaviour 
and social situations. It aims to measure the cognitive abilities of generalization skills, 
ability to categorize and summarize information and ability to draw on past experiences 
(long term memory) to make moral and social judgments.  
 
 
 
 48 
Gender 
 
An additional question addressed by this study concerned the topic of gender differences 
in cognitive and reading ability. There have been numerous research reports examining 
the biological, psychological, cultural, and political influences which are presumed to 
influence and shape gender differences in cognition, emotion, language, and behaviour. 
For example, it is well established that females excel over males across a variety of 
language related tasks (Bayley, 1968; Broverman, 1968; Harris, 1978; Hampson & Kimura 
1992; Harshman, 1983; Hyde and Lynn, 1988; Kimura, 1993; Koenigsknecht & Friedman, 
1976; Lezak, 1983; McGlone, 1980; McGuiness, 1976; Moore, 1967 cited in Joseph, 2000; 
Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974 cited in Lloyd, Walsh & Yailagh, 2005; Shibley & Marcia, 1988). 
Females also produce more social?emotional vocalizations (Brody, 1985; Burton & Levy, 
1989; Gilbert, 1969; Joseph, 1993, Joseph, 1996, Joseph, 1999; Tannen, 1990 cited in 
Joseph, 2000), thereby learning more about personal relationships whereas males are 
more visual-spatially orientated (Joseph, 2000). Many of the commonly-cited gender 
stereotypes go unchallenged as social accepted wisdom, with the majority of the research 
being directed toward underachieving boys (Ofsted, 2003a & Ofsted, 2003b cited in Jones 
& Myhill, 2004). Boys are often encouraged to identify with a set of ?macho? values that 
reject the values of education (Mac & Ghaill, 1994; Martino, 1999 cited in Jones & Myhill, 
2004). Similarly boys are often stereotyped as being weaker at language skills and seen 
as less committed readers and disliking writing activities (Millard, 1997; Gorman; White; 
Brooks; Malcure & Kispal, 1988 cited in Jones & Myhill, 2004). Boys are generally seen as 
more mathematically and spatially skilled, while girls are seen as more verbally orientated 
(Bee & Boyd, 2004; Liederman, Kantrowitz & Flannery, 2005). This is probably why the 
ratio of boys being referred for reading problems is much higher than girls (Liederman et 
al., 2005). Bjorklund (2005) concur and suggest that the fact that more boys than girls are 
 49 
regarded as reading disabled is strong evidence for a biological basis to account for this 
gender difference.  
 
Shibley and Marcia (1988) in an attempt to reassess the gender differences in verbal 
ability analysed 165 studies on gender functioning. They reported overall slight female 
superiority, however effect sizes were so small that differences in verbal ability between 
gender?s seemed non-existent. Among the variables assessed were vocabulary, 
analogies, and comprehension with the analogies subtest showing slight male superiority 
in performance. Other contrasting results were also found within the analyses where 
studies done in 1985 using the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) showed male superiority in 
performance on verbal abilities. Further analyses were conducted on gender differences at 
different ages as well with no significant differences emerging. This contradicts the work of 
Maccoby and Jacklin (1974 cited in Shibley & Marcia, 1988) who suggest that girls verbal 
abilities mature before that of boys therefore are expected to perform better in ?high-level? 
verbal tasks like analogies and comprehension. Although majority of the research supports 
female superiority in verbal tasks, differences are only presented after the age of 10 or 11 
(Anastasi, 1958; Denno, 1982; Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974 cited in Shibley & Marcia, 1988). 
 
Cockroft and Blackburn (2008), in a study consisting of 64 grade 2 learners, found that 
boys unexpectedly achieved significantly higher than the girls on two verbal subtests 
(Vocabulary and Similarities) of the SSAIS-R. These results support tentative suggestions 
that gender differences are beginning to even out. According to Feingold (1988 cited in 
Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008) and Flynn (1998 cited in Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008), 
gender differences with regards to verbal reasoning in American and Israeli males and 
females prove to be decreasing with each passing decade. This change is attributed to 
equal exposure of the genders to educational and social environments which are the main 
 50 
contributors to verbal abilities (Bradshaw & Nettleton, 1983). Some recent studies have 
found differences in cognitive functioning between genders, however the effect sizes were 
found to be small (Logan & Johnston, 2009). Another possible explanation to the above 
scenario, is the issue of different forms of reading (Hall & Coles, 1999 cited in Logan & 
Johnston, 2009). Boys have been found to read more newspapers (Hall & Coles, 1999 
cited in Logan & Johnston, 2009) and articles or information of the internet (Mullis, Martin, 
Gonzalez & Kennedy, 2007 cited in Logan & Johnston, 2009). This kind of reading is 
usually not a part of traditional reading assessments and therefore may go unnoticed, 
unless informal self report measures are used (Logan & Johnston, 2009) and this may also 
contribute to the absence of differences in reading ability between males and females. 
 
Other factors that have been identified to contribute to the gender differences in cognitive 
functioning are attitudes to reading and frequency of reading. High positive attitudes have 
obviously yielded higher average reading achievement (Mullis, Martin, Gonzalez & 
Kennedy, 2003 cited in Logan & Johnston, 2009; Mullis et al., 2007 cited in Logan & 
Johnston, 2009). Logan and Johnston (2009) identified girls as having much better 
comprehension skills, reading more frequently and having a more positive attitude 
compared to boys. 
 
In conclusion, this study aims to identify if specific subtests of the WISC-IV are related to 
reading ability as measured by the Neale-R. In addition another aim is to determine the 
functioning of the different gender groups and identify the differences (if any) in reading 
ability exhibited by males and females. 
 
 
 
 51 
Chapter Three 
Method 
 
Research design: 
 
This research was exploratory in nature, with the aim of drawing conclusions between 
reading ability and IQ subtest scores. This study attempted to investigate the relationship 
between the independent variable, namely performance on the WISC-IV subtests and the 
dependent variable, reading ability as assessed by the Neale Analysis of Reading ? 
Revised (NEALE-R). The research design was a non-experimental, ex-post facto, 
correlational design. A non-experimental method was adopted aimed at exploring the 
natural occurrence of a phenomenon as opposed to manipulating variables. An ex-post 
facto method was used due to the pre-existing characteristics of the participants, and a 
correlational design was adopted because of the assessment of the relationship between 
variables. 
 
Sample: 
 
The sample was a convenience sample and consisted of volunteers. The 33 participants 
were grade two boys and girls from a English medium school in Lenasia, Gauteng. All of 
the grade two children at the school were invited to participate in the study. The age of the 
whole sample ranged from approximately 7 to 8 years old. Grade two learners have had 
some basic reading instruction. The testing was conducted individually by a qualified 
psychometrist.  
 
 52 
The exclusion criterion consisted of children that were diagnosed with ADHD, Learning 
Disorders, Speech Disorders or auditory difficulty which were determined by the parent 
questionnaire.  The sample consisted of 17 males and 16 females. All 33 participants 
shared the same home language of English. 
 
Instruments: 
 
This study consisted of two standardised assessments and one questionnaire which will 
be discussed in more detail below. Of the two standardised instruments one constituted an 
intelligence scale, namely the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children ? Fourth Edition 
(WISC-IV) and the other a reading assessment, namely the Neale Analysis of Reading 
Ability ? Revised (Neale-R).  
 
The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children ? Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) (Wechsler, 2003) 
 
The WISC-IV was designed to obtain a differential profile of intelligence-related cognitive 
abilities. It is standardized for English speaking learners between the ages of six years and 
zero months and sixteen years and eleven months. The test?s norms were derived from a 
sample of White, African American, Hispanics, Asians, Mixed race complying with these 
criteria (Wechsler, 2003). Although there are no WISC-IV norms for the South African 
population, the aim of the current study was not to compare the WISC-IV subtest scores to 
the norm population, but rather to examine their relationship to reading. 
 
The WISC-IV consists of 15 subtests and four indexes which are used to construct the 
Verbal, Non-verbal and Full Scale IQ scores. The subtests are Vocabulary, Similarities, 
Comprehension, Information, Word Reasoning, Arithmetic, Cancellation, Letter-number 
 53 
sequencing, Coding, Picture Completion, Block Design, Digit Span, Matrix Reasoning, 
Cancellation, Picture Concepts, of which five were chosen for this study. Due to time 
constraints, the full IQ test was not administered; the five subtests used in this study were 
Vocabulary, Similarities, Comprehension, Word Reasoning and Digit Span. Those that 
contribute to the Verbal Scale are Vocabulary, Comprehension, Word Reasoning and 
Similarities. The Digit Span subtest falls in the Non-Verbal Scale.  
 
The Vocabulary subtest involves activities where the child needs to give definitions as best 
as they can for words that the researcher reads out aloud. It assesses receptive language, 
verbal intelligence and verbal learning ability. According to Frith?s (1985) theory a child 
needs some form vocabulary knowledge to be able to read effectively. Likewise with 
consistent reading, vocabulary is developed. 
 
The Similarities subtest consists of verbal activities where the child is orally presented with 
two words that represent common objects or concepts and needs to describe how they are 
similar. It examines the ability to make associations and form concepts and to grasp the 
notion of likeness. This subtest was chosen as according to Frith?s (1985) theory on 
reading, understanding abstract similarities (analogies) is an important skill in acquiring 
reading skills. This includes looking for similarities between new words and words already 
known for example, using the word ?bottle? to read the word ?throttle? (Ehri, 2005). 
 
The Comprehension subtest involves the child by asking them questions based on their 
understanding of general principals and social situations. It aims to measure generalization 
skills, ability to categorise and summarise information and to be able to draw on past 
experiences to make moral and social judgments. These skills are important skills for 
reading comprehension to occur. 
 54 
 
 The Word Reasoning subtest involves identifying the common concept that is being 
described in a series of clues, which measures the skills of logical thinking ability, verbal 
comprehension and ability to synthesise different types of information and generate 
alternative concepts. 
 
The Digit Span subtest is divided into two parts; the first part involves a sequence of 
numbers orally presented to the child that the child needs to repeat in the correct 
sequence back to the researcher. This is called digits forwards. The second part involves a 
series of numbers orally presented to the child but the child needs to repeat the numbers 
backwards this time. This is called digits backwards. The aim is to measure auditory short-
 term memory, sequencing skills, attention and concentration (Foxcroft & Roodt, 2005; 
Wechsler, 2003). Digit Span also assesses memory and attention to detail. Both these 
skills are important in the process of reading as a child needs be able to recall not only 
what was read but also be able to link it to information from long term memory. This 
assists in comprehending what was read as well. Attention is also important as it aids 
comprehension and allows the child to decode words correctly. 
 
The WISC-IV also provides a measure on four index scores. The four index scores consist 
of the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), the Perceptual Reasoning Index (PRI), the 
Working Memory Index (WMI) and the Processing Speed Index (PSI). The Verbal 
Comprehension Index is composed of subtests measuring verbal abilities utilizing 
reasoning, comprehension, and conceptualization, and the Perceptual Reasoning Index is 
composed of subtests measuring perceptual reasoning and organization. The Working 
Memory Index is composed of subtests measuring attention, concentration, and working 
 55 
memory, and the Processing Speed Index is composed of subtests measuring the speed 
of mental and graphomotor processing (Wechsler, 2003). 
 
Evidence for internal consistency of the WISC-IV subtests was obtained using the split half 
method. Due to some subtests loading on the processing speed index, the spilt-half 
coefficient is not a proper estimate of reliability. Therefore a test-retest method was 
adopted. The test-retest reliability was estimated for five age groups (6 ? 7, 8 ? 9, 10 ? 11, 
12 -13 and 14 ? 16) using Person?s product- moment correlation. The WISC-IV scores 
possess adequate stability across time for all five age groups (Wechsler, 2003).  
 
The average corrected stability coefficient for Vocabulary is excellent (.92); the average 
stability coefficient for Similarities, Digit Span, Block Design, coding, Letter ? Number 
Sequencing, Matrix Reasoning, Comprehension, Symbol Search, Picture Completion, 
Information and Word Reasoning are good (in the range of 0.80) and other subtests are 
adequate (in the range of 0.70) (Wechsler, 2003).  
 
The mean scores for the standardised sample for all subtests are higher than the scores 
from the first testing, with the effect sizes ranging from .80 (Comprehension) to .60 (Picture 
Completion). Generally, test-retest gains are less distinct for the subtests on the Verbal 
Comprehension index and the Working Memory Index than the subtests on the Perceptual 
Reasoning index and the Processing Speed index (Wechsler, 2003). 
 
Reliability for the WISC-IV was obtained through a test-retest method. The reliabilities for 
the subtests chosen for this study ranged between 0.74 ? 0.86 for the ages 7 ? 8 years 
respectively. The reliabilities for the individual subtests for 7 - 8 years respectively are: 
Similarities subtest r = 0.85 and r = 0.86; Digit Span subtest r = 0.81 and r = 0.84; 
 56 
Vocabulary subtest r = 0.85 and r = 0.86; Comprehension subtest r = 0.74 and r = 0.78; 
Word Reasoning subtest r = 0.81 and r = 0.83 (Wechsler, 2003). 
 
Neale Analysis of Reading Ability ? Revised (Neale-R) (Neale, 1989) 
 
The NEALE-R is a test of English reading ability which assesses reading accuracy, rate 
and comprehension. It consists of six pages of prose, each page consisting of a passage 
that the child reads as a narrative. The passages are designed to be meaningful to 
particular age levels. The age levels are from six years to thirteen years old. The difficulty 
level of passages gradually increases by including more complex vocabulary and sentence 
structures. There are four comprehension questions following the first passage and eight 
for the subsequent five passages. These are orally presented to the child by the examiner. 
 
If the child makes more than two errors in a passage, an easier passage is accorded and 
conversely if a child makes less than two errors a progressively more difficult passage is 
given until a ceiling has been reached. All errors made will be recorded and categorized in 
one of six groups, namely mispronunciations, substitutions, refusals, additions, omissions 
or reversals (Neale, 1989). 
 
The internal consistency levels of the standardized sample were calculated using 
Cronbach?s generalised co-efficient alpha for accuracy and comprehension. There are two 
alternate versions of the test (Forms One and Two) for purposes of evaluating reading 
ability and progress over time (Spooner, Baddeley & Gathercole, 2004). (Form one was 
used in this study and the internal reliability for Form One is r = 0.71 (Rate), r = 0.89 
(Comprehension). Although the Neale is standardized on a sample of British learners, the 
stanine scores of the learners that participated in the study have been correlated with their 
 57 
IQ test scores, derived from the subtests of the WISC-IV (Neale, 1989). Thus, the focus 
was not on their performance relative to the norm sample. 
 
Biographical Questionnaire 
 
A Biographical Questionnaire was sent out to determine the primary / home language and 
relevant biographical information. All of the children who attend the school come from 
middle-to upper income homes. Since socio-economic status has been found to have an 
impact on reading ability, it was seen as important to determine this variable and hold it 
constant (Mosely, 1980; Seymour, 2000). A question on the parent?s occupation was 
placed in the questionnaire. Based on the feedback, the parents of all participants held 
semi-professional jobs, creating a similar socio economic background. (Refer to Appendix 
C) 
Procedure: 
 
All Grade two children were invited to participate in the study. Those children who were 
willing to participate and whose parents/guardians had given consent were included in the 
sample. The sample group was then divided into two groups. For half of the sample, the 
WISC-IV was administered first, followed by the Neale-R, and for the other half the order 
was reversed. However, the order of the WISC-IV subtests remained constant for all 
learners. This was done to eliminate any possible effects that order of presentation of the 
tests may have had.  
 
A suitable time was discussed with the teachers in order to create minimal disruptions in 
the classroom as well as proposed to be beneficial to the child?s educational and emotional 
well being. A suitable room was also chosen to avoid major distractions, make sure the 
 58 
lighting was appropriate, enough fresh air could be circulated and appropriate furniture 
was available. Once this was set, the teacher sent one child at a time for the assessment. 
The children were then introduced to the researcher and explained the process and 
purpose of the research in very simple terms and also that they could decide if they did not 
want to participate and that there were no consequences to their decisions. The tests were 
administered by a qualified psychometrist. 
 
The researcher attempted to create a calm and relaxed atmosphere to reduce any anxiety 
the children may have been experiencing. This was done by taking some time to establish 
rapport with the client at the beginning of the assessment. When the researcher needed to 
rate responses, it was done using codes and symbols and not ticks and crosses. This was 
done to once again reduce any performance anxiety that could have been experienced. 
 
Ethics: 
 
The first ethical consideration was consent, because of the age of the participants and 
their inability to give consent, it was vital that an informed letter was sent to the parents 
stating exactly what the research was about, the positives and negatives of the research 
and the harms and benefits it may have on their children. It was also deemed important 
that the parents discuss the research with their children and determine if they would like to 
participate in the research. The study was therefore done on a voluntary basis, and 
participants and their parents were advised that they may withdraw at any point with no 
prejudice. The children who participated gave verbal assent after being explained the 
process and were given an opportunity to withdraw with no consequences and no 
questions asked. 
 
 59 
Another issue that was considered was that of confidentiality. Anonymity was not ensured 
as the researcher needed the children?s names in order to correlate the scores form the 
two different tests. However the results were coded before being analysed. 
 
Any reading difficulties that were identified were communicated to the respective parents 
and teachers were also made aware of these difficulties with the permission of the parents. 
 
Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Witwatersrand research committee 
as well as permission from the school principal before the research commenced. (See 
Appendix F for the University Ethics Certificate) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 60 
Chapter Four 
Results 
 
Introduction 
 
This research was done with the aim of finding an association or relationship between 
cognitive abilities, as measured by the subtests on the WISC-IV and reading skills as 
measured by the Neale-R. An additional question addressed by this study was to 
determine if there were any gender differences in performance on the WISC-IV subtests 
and on the Neale-R. 
 
Descriptive Statistics 
 
Descriptive Statistics include a brief description and summary of the available information 
about the sample. It reduces large amounts of data into a more manageable and 
meaningful form. 
 
Table 1 contains the means and standard deviations for the subtests of the WISC-IV and 
the Neale-R. The first five subtests show the descriptive statistics for the WISC-IV subtests 
and the last three are the descriptive statistics for the Neale-R subtests. For the statistical 
analysis, raw scores were converted to stanines in the case of the Neale-R and standard 
scores in the case of the WISC-IV. The Satterthwaite test was used to check for 
equivalence of variance. All subtests were found to have equal variances. 
 
 
 
 
 61 
Table 1. 
 
Descriptive statistics for total sample (N=33) 
________________________________________________________________________  
Variable                             Mean        Median     St. Dev      Minimum          Maximum   
                                                                                                 Score               Score 
________________________________________________________________________ 
Similarities                9.30        9.00 2.72  5  15 
Digit Span                    9.36          9.00 2.70  3  16 
Vocabulary                  6.36          6.00 1.65  3  10 
Comprehension           8.70          9.00 2.21  4  13 
Word reasoning           9.30          9.00 2.34  6  15 
Accuracy                   4.36          4.00 1.19  2  6 
Rate                         4.42          4.00 1.41  2  8 
Comprehension                  4.36          4.00        1.69  1  7 
________________________________________________________________________ 
 
The sample consisted of 17 male participants, when the sample was split into gender 
groups. Table 2 below shows the descriptive statistics for all the males in the sample. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 62 
Table 2. 
 
Descriptive statistics for males in the sample (n = 17)  
________________________________________________________________________ 
Variable                             Mean             St Dev         Min                Max 
_________________________________________Score______Score_______________ 
Similarities   9.35  2.53  5  14    
Digit Span   9.47  2.10  6  14 
Vocabulary   6.24  1.86  3  10 
Comprehension  9.24  1.92  6  13 
Word reasoning  8.88  2.15  6  13 
Accuracy    4.12  1.22  2  6 
Rate    4.59  1.58  2  8 
Comprehension                  4.29               1.69              1                    7   
________________________________________________________________________ 
 
The sample consisted of 16 female participants as depicted in table 3 below. Table 3 
shows the descriptive statistics for all the females in the sample.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 63 
Table 3. 
 
Descriptive statistics for females in the sample (n =  16)  
________________________________________________________________________ 
Variable                             Mean             Std Dev         Min                Max 
________________________________________________________________________ 
Similarities   9.25  3.00  5  15    
Digit Span   9.25  3.30  3  16 
Vocabulary   6.50  1.46  4  9 
Comprehension  8.13  2.42  4  13 
Word reasoning  9.75  2.52  6  15 
Accuracy    4.63  1.15  2  6 
Rate    4.25  1.24  2  6 
Comprehension                  4.44               1.75              1                    7 
________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Normality 
 
Three assumptions need to be investigated for data to be suitable for parametric statistical 
analysis. One of the assumptions is a normal distribution of the data. The Kolgorov-
 Smirnov test was done to check for this. The histograms for each subtest revealed 
generally normal distributions of scores (Refer to appendix E for histograms). The second 
assumption necessary for parametric analysis is random independent sampling. The 
sample used in this study was a convenience sample of volunteers, thus it was not 
randomly selected. The order of the tests was randomly allocated to participants. The third 
assumption is use of interval measurement scales. Both the WISC-IV and the Neale-R 
utilized interval scales of measurement. The fourth assumption for parametric analysis is 
 64 
the homogeneity of variance (Howell, 1997), which was done using the Satterthwaite test 
where equivalence of variance was achieved. 
 
Correlations 
 
Since the sample size was small, both parametric and non-parametric analyses were 
conducted. Thus both Pearson?s Product Moment and Spearmans correlation coefficients 
were conducted for the whole sample and then separately by gender in order to determine 
any relationships between the eight variables, namely five WISC-IV subtests and three 
Neale-R reading components. Depicted below in table four are the correlations for the 
complete sample. 
 
Table 4.  
 
Pearson?s Correlation Coefficients between all variables in the total sample (N = 33) 
________________________________________________________________________                        
Variable                   Similarities         Digit Span        Vocab       Comp       Word Reasoning           
________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Accuracy  0.25  0.21  0.07  -0.11  0.26 
       
Rate       0.21  0.05  0.25  0.18  0.33 
     
Comp                 0.13  0.18  0.22  0.04  0.45                          
________________________________________________________________________ 
 
 65 
No statistically significant correlations were found with  = 0.05, which is likely to be a 
result of the small sample size. Table 5 summarizes the results from the Spearman?s 
Correlation that was conducted.  
 
Table 5.  
 
Spearman?s Correlation Coefficients between all variables in the total sample (N = 33) 
_______________________________________________________________________  
                        
Variable            Similarities         Digit Span        Vocab       Comp       Word Reasoning 
________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Accuracy 0.27  0.19  0.02  -0.10  0.23 
      
Rate      0.24  -0.02  0.25  0.21  0.34* 
 
Comp                0.09  0.22  0.16  0.05  0.41* 
                
________________________________________________________________________ 
*p = < 0.05 
 
Since the Spearman?s correlational analysis is more lenient that the Pearson?s 
correlational analysis two statistically significant correlations were found. As presented in 
table 5, moderate significant correlations were found between the variables word 
reasoning and rate (r = 0.34; p < 0.05) and word reasoning and comprehension (r = 0.41; 
p < 0.05).  
 66 
 
Spearman?s Correlational analyses were carried out with the separate gender sub-
 samples as well. Table 6 depicts intercorrelations within the male sub-sample. 
 
Table 6.  
 
Spearman?s Correlation Coefficients for Males (n = 17) 
________________________________________________________________________  
                        
  Variable                Similarities         Digit Span        Vocab       Comp       Word Reasoning 
________________________________________________________________________ 
Accuracy        0.56*  -0.08  0.12  -0.09  0.36 
 
Rate      0.35  -0.06  0.34  0.38  0.42 
 
Comp                0.14  -0.09  0.08  -0.07  0.53* 
________________________________________________________________________ 
*p = < 0.05 
 
The next table indicates intercorrelations within the female sub-sample. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 67 
Table 7. 
 
Spearman?s Correlation Coefficients for Females (n = 16) 
________________________________________________________________________  
                        
  Variable          Similarities         Digit Span        Vocab       Comp       Word Reasoning 
________________________________________________________________________ 
Accuracy -0.02  0.40  -0.04  0.08  0.03 
     
Rate      0.08   0.05  0.13  0.03  0.33 
      
Comp                -0.04   0.42  0.23  0.11  0.32                  
________________________________________________________________________ 
*p = < 0.05 
 
From tables 6 and 7 it is evident that correlations for the male sample differed from those 
for the female sample. Statistically significant correlations were found in the male sample 
only. These were between the Similarities subtest of the WISC-IV and the Accuracy 
subtest of the Neale-R (r = 0.56; p < 0.05) and between the Word Reasoning subtest of 
the WISC-IV and the Comprehension subtest of the Neale-R (r = 0.53; p < 0.05).   
 
t-Tests 
 
The t-test is used to determine if the mean of one group is significantly different from that 
of a second group. It was done here to determine whether the groups of females differed 
 68 
from the males in their functioning on the various subtests. Table 8 below depicts this 
value for all the variables. 
 
Table 8. 
 
Independent t tests between boys? and girls? data (N = 33) 
________________________________________________________________________  
                                                         Boys                               Girls 
Variable            Mean               SD             Mean             SD                 t       
________________________________________________________________________ 
Similarities   9.35             2.52     9.25             3.00          0.10   
Digit Span   9.47         2.10         9.25             3.30          0.23 
Vocabulary   6.24         1.86    6.50            1.46          -0.46 
Comprehension  9.24         1.92    8.13            2.42          1.44   
Word reasoning  8.82         2.15    9.75            2.52          1.13 
Accuracy    4.12             1.22        4.63             1.15          1.24 
Rate    4.59         1.58    4.25            1.24          0.65 
Comprehension  4.29             1.69        4.44             1.75          -0.25 
________________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
Conclusion  
 
Analyses were conducted using both the Pearson?s and Spearman?s Correlation 
Coefficients, for all the subtests in this study. Two significant correlations were found with 
the Word Reasoning Subtest on the WISC-IV and the Rate and Comprehension subtest of 
the Neale-R. Analyses conducted on the separate gender groups indicated two significant 
 69 
correlations within the male sample only with a significant correlation between the 
Similarities subtest of the WISC-IV and the Accuracy subtest of the Neale-R and the 
second correlation between the Word Reasoning subtest of the WISC-IV and the 
Comprehension subtest of the Neale-R. T-tests conducted between the males and 
females yielded no significant results. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 70 
Chapter Five 
Discussion 
 
The main aim of this research was to determine if specific WISC-IV subtests were related 
to reading ability. As discussed in Chapter Two, the literature review suggests the need for 
new reading assessments to help identify children at risk of reading difficulties. The 
worldwide literacy crisis has created a demand for reading assessments, specifically in 
South Africa, where the statistics are discouraging, especially in populations who cannot 
afford reading assessments. The WISC-IV is a commonly used intelligence test in 
assessments conducted on children. It was therefore suggested that if the subtests of the 
WISC-IV were related to reading ability then children at risk for reading difficulties could be 
identified much easier, thereby giving them an opportunity to remediate their difficulties. 
The second aim of this research was to determine if any gender differences existed in 
terms of functioning on the various measures. Considerable literature has focused on the 
differences in overall functioning between males and females and the differences in 
performance in reading ability between males and females are no different (Joseph, 2000). 
  
The literature review discussed the various cognitive skills that are used in the process of 
reading (Wagner & Torgesen, 1987). Despite this, only a few statistically significant 
correlations were found between the WISC-IV subtests and the Neale-R reading test in the 
current study. In particular significant correlations were expected between the Similarities, 
Vocabulary, Digit Span, Comprehension and Word Reasoning subtests and the Neale?R 
subtests of Accuracy, Rate and Comprehension was expected as they appear to be 
drawing on related cognitive skills. From the subtests of the WISC?IV chosen for this 
study, four of the five subtests used in the study load onto the WISC-IV Verbal 
Comprehension Index (Adams, 1996; Arlin, 1981; Stothard & Hulme, 1996), which plays a 
 71 
main role in reading acquisition and one subtest which loads onto an important skill 
needed for reading namely, working memory (Badderley, 2003). 
 
Due to the small sample size and since some of the data distributions were not normal, 
both parametric and non-parametric analyses were conducted. Correlations run on the 
complete sample will be discussed first and thereafter the correlations between the gender 
groups will be discussed for each of the subtests from the WISC-IV.  For the parametric 
analysis, Pearson?s Product Moment correlations were conducted on the whole sample but 
yielded no significant correlations. However, Spearman?s correlations revealed two 
statistically significant correlations. It is important to note that results from the Spearman?s 
correlations should be interpreted with caution as the Spearman?s correlation coefficient 
tends to be more lenient compared to the Pearson?s correlation coefficient. 
 
From the correlations on the complete sample, no significant correlations were found 
between the Vocabulary, Similarities, Comprehension and Digit Span subtests of the 
WISC-IV. The Word Reasoning subtest of the WISC-IV and the Neale-R subtests however 
was significantly correlated with the Rate and Comprehension subtests of the Neale-R. 
 
The significant correlation between the Word Reasoning subtest of the WISC-IV and the 
Comprehension subtest of the Neale-R, implies that the two subtests measure similar 
cognitive skills (r = 0.41; p < 0.05). The Comprehension subtest of the Neale-R assesses 
basic verbal comprehension, which is similar to the skills assessed by the Word 
Reasoning subtest of the WISC-IV which are verbal comprehension, analogical and 
general reasoning ability, verbal abstraction, domain knowledge, the ability to integrate 
and synthesize different types of information and the ability to generate alternative 
concepts (Ackerman, Beier & Bowen, 2000; Alexander & Kulikowich, 1991; Delis, Kaplan, 
 72 
Kramer, 2001; DeSanti, 1989; McKenne & Layton, 1990; Newstead, Thompson & 
Handley, 2002; Ridgeway, 1995 cited in Wechsler, 2003).  This result supports the findings 
of Yuill (1996, cited in Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998) where riddles were used to assess 
comprehension ability in children aged between seven and eight years old. The use of 
riddles as a teaching method significantly improved comprehension. 
 
The Word Reasoning subtest was also found to correlate significantly with reading rate on 
the Neale-R (r = 0.34; p < 0.05). A possible explanation of these findings could be the fact 
that an increase in the speed of reading facilitates better comprehension. For instance, if a 
child struggles to decode words, they probably spend more time in attempting to decode 
the words correctly, thereby slowing down their reading rate. In the process the child is so 
busy concentrating on decoding the words, they tend to forget what they have read 
already, in that way decreasing their comprehension. These findings are consistent with 
Frith?s (1985) theory on reading, whereby she states in the orthographic stage, children 
have better reading comprehension than at the previous stage (alphabetic stage). This is 
because at the orthographic stage, the child has mastered the art of recognising words 
quickly and visually without recourse. 
 
Surprisingly, a statistically significant correlation was not found between the Word 
Reasoning subtest of the WISC-IV and the Accuracy component of the Neale-R, as 
literature indicates that reading accuracy skills influence reading comprehension (D? 
Angiulli & Siegel, 2003), since if a word is decoded correctly, then understanding is more 
likely to occur, however on the contrary if a word is spelt incorrectly, either 
misunderstanding or no understanding is likely to occur. For example:  this supports the 
idea that if words are pronounced correctly, comprehension would occur naturally. 
 
 73 
When correlations were run for the separate gender groups, a statistically significant 
correlation was found between the Word Reasoning subtest and the Comprehension 
subtest (r = 0.53; p < 0.05) of the Neale-R for the male subgroup. These results are the 
same as the correlation found within the whole sample for these variables which is 
obviously coming from the boys group.  
 
The literature on gender differences and academic achievement is extensive, however, 
despite all the work that has been done, researchers have reached consensus on only a 
handful of findings. For example, it is widely accepted that females score higher on 
average than males on tests of verbal abilities  (Bee & Boyd, 2004; Liederman, Kantrowitz 
& Flannery, 2005), and that males score higher on average than females on tests of 
mathematical and spatial ability (Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974 cited in Lloyd, Walsh & Yailagh, 
2005). Therefore based on the above research it was expected for the girls to perform 
better in the Word Reasoning (verbal ability) subtest than boys. However no significant 
correlations were found in the girls sample with the Word Reasoning subtest. 
 
Within the total sample, no significant correlations were found between the Similarities 
subtest of the WISC-IV and the subtests of the Neale-R. This is contrary to expectations, 
since the literature review, suggested that there should be significant correlations between 
all three components of the Neale-R and the WISC-IV subtests. For the Accuracy 
component, skills of looking for concepts of likeness and association were seen to 
supplement the decoding of words accurately (Ehri & McCormik, 1998). Therefore, a 
significant correlation was expected between the Similarities subtest of the WISC-IV and 
the Accuracy component of the Neale-R.  The expectation of a correlation between the 
Rate and Comprehension component of the Neale-R and the Similarities subtest of the 
WISC-IV was based on the work of D?Angiulli and Siegel (2003) where correct decoding 
 74 
lead to increase in rate of reading and therefore better comprehension of what was being 
read. The lack of significant correlations between the Neale-R components and the 
Similarities subtest of the WISC-IV may result from the type of variables being measured 
in the subtests and the small sample size.  
 
The Similarities subtest, however showed some significant correlations with the Neale- 
R when the correlations for the separate gender groups were run. A statistically significant 
correlation was found between the Similarities subtest and the Accuracy subtest (r = 0.56; 
p < 0.05) on the Neale-R for the male subgroup of the sample.  
 
This significant correlation is a valuable finding in the study of gender differences in 
reading. Shibley and Marcia (1988) noted female superiority in their studies on verbal 
ability (including analogies subtests). However similar studies done in 1985 indicated male 
superiority in this area (Shibley & Marcia, 1988). Cockcroft and Blackburn (2008) also 
indicate similar findings to that of the 1985 studies of Shibley and Marcia where boys were 
found to achieve significantly higher than girls on two subtests of an intelligence test, with 
the Similarities subtest being one of them. However other studies show a decline in the 
differences in overall gender functioning, which is partly due to the equal social and 
educational stimulation received by both boys and girls (Feingold, 1988 cited in Cockcroft 
& Blackburn, 2008; Flynn, 1998 cited in Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008).  
 
With regards to the Vocabulary subtest of the WISC-IV, existing research indicates that 
vocabulary is a significant predictor of reading ability (Mosely, 1980; Muter, Hulme, 
Snowling & Stevenson, 2004). Word knowledge (vocabulary) is highly correlated with 
reading comprehension ability in both children and adults (Carroll, 1993), and thus a 
correlation between the Vocabulary subtest and the Comprehension subtest of the Neale-
 75 
R was expected. However in the current study, the Vocabulary subtest of the WISC-IV 
showed no significant correlations with any of the reading measures on the Neale-R. This 
finding is difficult to explain as literature states that a good vocabulary has been related to 
the ability to access higher level cognitive functions such as comprehension skills (Mosely, 
1980; Muter, Hulme, Snowling & Stevenson, 2004). Further, a good vocabulary enables 
readers to read much faster and more accurately. Although, the precise relation between 
the two variables is not clear, knowledge of word meanings (vocabulary) is related to the 
ability to understand text, and if there are too many unknown words in a story, it is easy to 
lose the sense of the whole. Conversely, limited vocabulary knowledge does not always 
impair comprehension, as already noted by several researchers who have demonstrated 
that children can experience text comprehension difficulties even when vocabulary 
knowledge is controlled for (Ehrlich & Remond, 1997; Oakhill, Cain, & Yuill, 1998; Stothard 
& Hulme, 1992).  
 
It is also important to bear in mind that the various reported studies which assessed the 
association between reading acquisition and vocabulary skills used different methods of 
assessing reading and vocabulary and this may account for the different findings. For 
instance, Cockcroft and Blackburn (2008) conducted their study using the SSAIS-R, where 
the Vocabulary subtest assesses receptive vocabulary skills as opposed to the expressive 
vocabulary skills assessed in the WISC-IV. In the SSAIS-R, vocabulary is assessed using 
pictures that a child needs to select that matches appropriately with a spoken word, 
whereas in the WISC-IV the child needs to give definitions as best as they can for words 
that the researcher reads out aloud. Both Vocabulary subtests overlapping aspects of 
verbal intelligence and verbal learning ability. Therefore although the same skills were 
measured by both subtests, the method adopted in each test could have influenced the 
differing results. The work of Stothard and Hulme (1996) supports the finding of Cockcroft 
 76 
and Blackburn (2008) as it was found that verbal abilities are facilitated through context. 
The pictures used in the Vocabulary subtest of the SSAIS-R, provide a context which 
possibly assists the child in identifying the correct association with the spoken word.  
 
Beck and Mckeoum (1991) and Nagy and Anderson (1984) experienced similar problems 
with differing methods. They too attempted to estimate the size of children?s vocabulary, 
but encountered difficulties in the different procedures used.  
 
In the current study, correlations were also run separately for the two gender groups, but 
no statistically significant correlations between Vocabulary and the Neale-R subtest were 
found. These results could be attributed to similar reasons as stated above. A meta-
 analysis of gender differences in verbal ability of 165 studies reported a slight female 
superiority in performance. However, differences between the genders were so small that 
it seems as if gender differences are non existent. In this meta-analysis, Vocabulary, 
Analogies (Similarities), Comprehension were among the skills measured (Shibley & 
Marcia, 1988). Further Maccoby and Jacklin (1974 cited in Shibley & Marcia, 1988) report 
that signs of differentiation on verbal ability skills become evident only from the age of 11 
years old. The participants of the current study were well below the age of 11 which could 
possibly account for the relatively equal performance of the boys and girls. 
 
The Comprehension subtest of the WISC-IV measures social and moral judgement 
abilities in children. Although research shows that social learning adds value to overall 
comprehension, it is possible that it does not make up as big a part of overall 
comprehension as was expected, as no significant correlations were found within the 
whole sample or within the separate gender samples between the Comprehension subtest 
of the WISC-IV and ant of the Neale-R components. Literature indicates that a child?s 
 77 
ability to grasp, retain and understand new concepts is dependent on existing knowledge 
(Robbins & Ehri, 1994 cited in Snow, Burns & Griffin, 1998). Therefore the skills measured 
in the Comprehension subtest of the WISC-IV would be expected to supplement the 
comprehension skills of the Word Reasoning subtest of the WISC-IV. 
 
The Digit Span subtest of the WISC-IV was the only subtest used in the study that loaded 
onto the Working Memory Index of the WISC-R. As discussed in the literature review, 
working memory to plays a vital role in the process of reading (Gathercole, Hitch, Service 
& Martin, 1997; Swanson & Howell, 2001cited in Georgiou, Das & Hayward, 2008; 
Wechsler, 2003). The ability to retain verbal information in working memory is essential for 
reading and learning, so it would be expected that verbal memory measures would be 
significantly correlated with reading achievement.  However in this study no statistically 
significant correlations were found between the Digit Span subtest and any of the Neale-R 
components. This is surprising as sequential, or serial cognitive processing is seen as 
more important during the initial stages of reading where a child needs to phonologically 
process a word. Based on the studies of Seymour and Elder (1985 cited in Harris & 
Coltheart, 1986) on the role of attention and sequential memory in identifying words, a 
statistically significant correlation between the Accuracy component of the Neale-R and 
the Digit Span subtest of the WISC-IV  was anticipated, however this was not the case. A 
possible explanation for the results could be attributed to the fact that the sample 
participants in the current study were in the middle of their second year of formal reading 
instruction. The skills tapped by the Digit Span subtest could have still been in the process 
of acquisition. 
 
 Literature indicates that the ability to store information in a correctly ordered sequence is 
fundamental to reading ability (Das, Parilla, Papadopoulos, 2000 cited in Cockcroft & 
 78 
Blackburn, 2008; Savage, Cornish, Manly & Hollis, 2006), especially reading 
comprehension. However, other studies indicate that the readers who are less skilled in 
comprehension abilities tend to remember short sentences or stories as well as good 
comprehenders (Oakhill, Cain & Bryant, 2003). A prediction studies have yielded similar 
results (Scarborough, 1998). It is clear that, on average, kindergartners? abilities to repeat 
sentences or to recall a brief story that was just read aloud to them are more strongly 
related to their future reading achievement than are their scores on Digit Span, word span, 
and pseudo-word repetition measures. Sentence or story recall, in fact, compares 
favorably with other predictors of reading (Seigneuric, Ehrilich, Oakhill & Yuill, 2000 cited 
in Oakhill, Cain & Bryant, 2003). 
 
When correlations were run within the separate gender groups no components of the 
Neale-R test correlated significantly with the Digit Span subtest. These findings once again 
were not in coherence with the expectations, as per the literature review. Overall two 
statistically significant correlations was found within the male sample between the Word 
Reasoning subtest of the WISC-IV and the Comprehension component of the Neale-R and 
the Similarities subtest of the WISC-IV and the Accuracy subtest of the Neale-R, but no 
significant correlations were found within the female sample. This was surprising as 
literature indicates that girls have better verbal skills than boys (Bee & Boys, 2004; 
Liederman, Kantrowitz & Flannery, 2005). However, literature also suggests that this 
assumption is decreasing rapidly based on the equality of exposure to social and 
educational environments for boys and girls (Feingold, 1988; Flynn, 1998 cited in 
Cockcroft & Blackburn, 2008). 
 
T-test analyses were also run on the gender groups to compare the males? and females? 
overall functioning on all of the variables. No significant differences were found, which can 
 79 
be attributed to the similarity in exposure and opportunity for both genders or that gender 
differences may only emerge later (approximately 10 or 11 years old)  (Anastasi, 1958; 
Denno, 1982; Maccoby & Jacklin, 1972 cited in Shibley & Marcia, 1988). 
 
In conclusion, statistically significant correlations were found only between the Word 
Reasoning subtest of the WISC-R and the Rate and Comprehension measures on the 
Neale-R. Two other statistically significant correlations were found when the sample was 
divided into gender groups, within the male sample only, which is contradictory to the 
majority of the literature in the area of gender differences in cognitive functioning. The two 
significant correlations found were between the Similarities subtest of the WISC-IV and the 
Accuracy subtest of the Neale-R and the Word Reasoning subtest of the WISC-IV and the 
Comprehension subtest of the Neale-R. 
 
Limitations of the study and suggestions for further research 
 
A major limitation identified within this study was the size of the sample of participants. 
This seemed to limit the amount of statistically significant correlations. Therefore it is 
suggested that the study be carried out with a bigger sample group. 
 
There were problems experienced in comparing studies due to different methods of 
assessing reading or cognitive skills across studies, which creates difficulties when 
attempting to compare studies. A suggestion to overcome this limitation is to replicate the 
study using the same measures as those used in the current study. 
 
 
 
 80 
References 
 
Adams, M. J. (1996). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 
 
Argyiis, C. D. & Schon, O. (1978). Organizational learning: Theory, Methods and Practice. 
Addison-Wesley, Reading, M. A. 
 
Arlin, P. (1981). Piagetian tasks as predictors of reading and math readiness in Grades K-
 1. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 712-721. 
 
Baatjes, I., John, V. & Aitchison, J. (1999, October). Volunteerism in ABET: Can it work? 
Centre for adult Education, School of Education, Training and Development, University of 
Natal, Pietermaritzburg: A paper presented to the 1999 Kenton Education Conference, 
Salt Rock, KwaZulu Natal. 
 
Baddeley, A. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. U.K.: Eilbaum Associates, 
publishers.  
 
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. American Association for the Advancement of 
Science. 255 (5044), 556-559.  
 
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working Memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews: 
Neuroscience, 4, 829 ? 839.  
 
Bee, H. & Boyd, D. (2004). The developing child.  Boston: Pearson. 
 
Beck, I.L. & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Social studies texts are hard to understand: 
Mediating some of the difficulties. Language Arts 68, 482-490. 
 
Beech, J. R. (2005). Ehris? model of phases learning to read: a brief critique. Journal in 
Research in Reading. 28 (1), 50-58. 
 
Bentlin, S., Hammer, R. & Cahan, S. (1991). The effects of aging and first grade schooling 
on the development of phonological awareness.  Psychological Science, 2, 271-274.  
 
 81 
Bjorklund, D. F. (2005). Children?s thinking. NJ, Australia: Thompson. 
 
Borgatti, S. P. & Cross, R. (2003). A Relational view of Information seeking and Learning 
in Social Networks. Management Science, 49 (4), 432-445. 
 
Bowers, P.G., Steffy, R. & Tate, E. (1998). Comparison of the effects of IQ control 
methods on memory and naming speed predictors of reading disability. Reading Research 
Quarterly, 23 (3), 304-319. 
 
Bradshaw, J. L. & Nettleton, N. C. (1983).  Human cerebral asymmetry.  Englewood Cliffs, 
NJ: Prentice-Hall. 
 
Bryant, P.E. & Bradley, L. (1985). Rhyme and Reason in Reading and Spelling. Ann Arbor: 
University of MichiganPress. 
 
Burt, C. (1937). The backward child. London: University of London Press. 
 
Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. M. A. 
 
Buthelezi, Z. (2003). Researchers, Beware of Your Assumptions! The Unique Case of 
South African Education. Reading Online; Nov 2003, p41, 9p 1bw. http://0-
 web15.epnet.com.raulib.rau.ac.za  
 
Calfee, R., Chapman, R. & Venezky, R. (1972). How a child needs to think to learn to 
read. In L. Gregg (Ed.), Cognition and learning in memory (pp. 139 ? 182). New York: 
Wiley. 
 
Campbell, T., Dollaghan, C., Needleman, H., & Janosky, J. (1997). Reducing bias in 
language assessment: processing-dependent measures.  Journal of speech, language, 
and hearing research, 40 (3), 519. 
 
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of factor-analytic studies. New 
York: Cambridge University Press. 
 
 82 
Chapman, J. W., Lambourne, R. & Silva. P. A. (1990). Some antecedents of academic 
self-concept: a longitudinal study. Massy Uni, New Zealand.  
 
Clay, M. (1991). Becoming Literate: The construction of inner control.  Portsmouth, NH: 
Heinemann. 
 
Cockcroft, K. & Blackburn, M. (2008). The relationship between Senior South African 
Individual Scale ? Revised (SSAIS-R) subtests and reading ability. South African Journal 
of Psychology, 38 (2), 377 ? 389. 
 
Cretchley, P. G. (2000). A Common Outcomes Model for language Examinations at Basic 
Education levels 1 and 2: A review of the theories and Concepts Underpinning Policy and 
Implementation. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis. Johannesburg University of Witwatersrand.  
 
D? Angiulli, A, & Siegel, L. S. (2003). Cognitive Functioning as measured by the WISC-R: 
Do children with learning disabilities have distinctive patterns of performance.  Journal of 
Learning Disabilities, 36 (1), 48-58. 
 
Daniels, P.T., & Bright, W. (1996). The World?s Writing Systems. New York: Oxford 
University Press. 
 
Daft, R., K. & Weick. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretive systems. 
Academic and Management Review, 9 (2), 284-295. 
 
Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 5-
 31. 
 
Ehri, L. C. (1991). Learning to read and spell words. In Rieben, L. & Perfetti, C.A. (Eds).  
Learning to Read: Basic Research and Its Implications, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 
Associates (pp. 57-73). 
 
Ehri, L. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read by sight. Journal in Research 
in Reading, 18. 116-125. 
 
 83 
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, Findings and Issues. Scientific Studies 
of Reading, 9 (27), 167-188. 
 
Ehri, L. C. & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for Instructing 
with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14 (2), 135-163. 
 
Ehri, L. C. & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the 1st stage of printed and 
reading visual/phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly 20, 163-179. 
 
Ehrlich, M.F., & Remond, M. (1997). Skilled and less skilled comprehenders: French 
children?s processing of anaphoric devices in written texts. British Journal of 
Developmental Psychology, 15, 291?309. 
 
Foxcroft, C. & Roodt, G. (2005). An Introduction to Psychological Assessment.  Cape 
Town: Oxford University Press. 
 
French, E. (1992). Adult literacy in South Africa: past to present. In (Ed.) Hutton, B., Adult 
Basic Education in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, (pp.48-85). 
 
Frith, U. (1985).  Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In Patterson, K.,Marshall, 
J. & Coltheart, M. (eds). Surface Dyslexia: Neuropsychological and Cognitive Studies of 
Phonological Reading. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (pp. 301-330). 
 
Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2002). Assessment of working memory in six-and-
 seven year old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 377 ? 390. 
 
Gathercole, S. E., Service, E., Hitch, G. H., Adams, A. M., & Martin, A. J. (1997). 
Phonological short-term memory and vocabulary development: Evidence on the nature of 
the relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 65?77. 
 
Georgiou, G. K. Das, J. P. & Hayward, D. V. (2008). Comparing the contribution of 2 tests 
of working memory to reading in relation to phonological awareness and rapid naming 
speed. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, (3), 302-318. 
 
 84 
Gipps, C. & Murphy, P. (1994). A fair test? Assessment, Achievement and Equity. Milton 
Keynes, Open University Press. 
 
Goswami, U. (1988). Orthographic analogies and reading development quarterly. Journal 
of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 239-268. 
 
Granoventer, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. Amererican Journal of Sociology, 78, 
1360-1380. 
 
Grasko, D. N. (2006). The phonic inventories: using spelling error patterns to identify 
children with potential learning difficulties. Unpublished Research Report. University of 
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. 
 
Graves, M.F., & Slater, W. H. (1987, April). Development of Reading Vocabularies in Rural 
Disadvantaged Students, Intercity Disadvantaged Students and Middle Class Suburban 
Students. Paper presented at AERA conference, Washington, DC. 
 
Harris, M., & Coltheart, M. (1986). Language Processing in Children and Adults. Routledge 
& Kegan Paul plc. 
 
Hart, B. & Risley, R.T. (1995). Meaningful differences in everyday experience of young 
American children. Baltimore: Pual H. Brookes.  
 
Hartshorne, K.B. (1992). Crises and challenge: Black education 1910-1990. Oxford 
University Press: Cape Town. 
 
Hempenstall, K. (2004). The potential power of instruction. 
http://www.imit.edu.au/departments/ps/staffpgs/hempens.htm  
 
Howell, D.C. (1997). Statistical methods of psychology, 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 
 
Hyde, G. W. & Cohen, M. (1983). Dyslexia: Neuropsychological theory, research, and 
clinical theory. Gune and Stratton; Australia. 
 
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press. 
 85 
 
Jensen, P. (1996). Assessing the cause of L. D.: a neuropsychological perspective. In P. 
Engelbretch, P., Kriegter, S. M & Booysen, M. Z. (Eds.), Perspective on learning 
difficulties: international concerns and S. A. realities. Pretoria: J. L. van Schaik Publishers 
(pp. 144-1530). 
 
Jones, S., Mayhill, D. (2004). ?Troublesome boys? and ?Compliant girls?: gender identity and 
perceptions of achievement and underachievement. British Journal of Sociology of 
Education, 25 (5), 547-561.  
 
Jorm, A. E., & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied 
Psycholinguistics, 4, 103-147.  
 
Joseph, R. (2000). The Evolution of Sex Differences in Language, Sexuality, and Visual-
 Spatial Skills. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 29 (1), 35-66. 
 
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first 
through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 437-447. 
 
Just, M.A. & Carpenter, P.A. (1987). The Psychology of Reading and Language 
Comprehension. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. 
 
Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P.D. & Barr, R. (2000). Handbook of Reading 
Research III. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 
 
Kammeenui, E., Fuchs, L., Francis, D., Good, R., O?Connor, R., Simmons, D., Tindal & 
Torgesen, J. (2006). The adequacy of fools for assessing reading competence: A 
framework and review. Educational Researcher, 35 (4), 3-11. 
 
Klein, P.S. & Schwartz, A.A. (1979). Effects of training auditory sequential memory and 
attention on reading. Journal of special edition, 13 (4).  
 
LaBerge, D. & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing 
in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 293-323. 
 
 86 
Laing, M.E. (1903). Reading: A manual for teachers. Boston: Heath. 
 
Landauer, T.K., and S.T. Dumais (1997). A solution to Plato?s problem: The latent 
semantic analysis theory of acquisition,induction, and representation of knowledge. 
Psychological Review, 104, 211-240. 
 
Liederman, J. Kantrowitz, L. & Flannery, K. (2005). Male vulnerability to reading disability 
is not likely to be a myth: a call for new data.  Journal of learning Disabilities, 38, 109-129. 
 
Lloyd, J.E.V., Walsh, J. & Yailagh, M.S. (2005). Sex differences in performance 
Attributions, Self-Efficacy, and Achievement in Mathematics: If I?m so smart, why don?t I 
know it? Canadian Journal of Education, 28 (3), 384-408. 
 
Logan, S. & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: 
examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading. 32 (2), 199-214.     
 
Mangena, M. (2003). Mangena: International literacy day (08/09/2003). Department of 
Education. (http://www.polity.org.za/article/mangena-international-literacy-day-08092003) 
 
Masonheimer, P.E., Drum, P.A. & Ehri, L.C. (1984). Does environmental print identification 
lead children into word reading? Journal of Reading Behaviour, 16, 257-271. 
 
Mencies, H. M., Mahdavi, J. N. & Lewis, J. L. (2008). Early intervention in Reading. 
Remedial and special Education, 29(2), 67-77.  
 
Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to print. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.  
 
Molfese, V., Molfese, D. & Modgline, A. (2001). Newborn and Preschool Predictors of 
Second-Grade Reading Scores: An Evaluation of Categorical and Continuous Scores. 
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34 (6), 545.  
 
Morgan, M. & Kett, M. (2003). The Prison Adult Literacy Survey. Irish Prison Service. 
 
Mosely, D. (1980). An evaluation of verbal, spatial and numerical sequencing scores in the 
WISC and WISC-R with special reference to children with reading difficulties. Journal of 
 87 
Research in Reading, 3 (1), 38-51. 
 
Mtshali, T. (2005). Shortfall of 11 000 new teachers each year deplored: Fewer enrol for 
training, while exodus from profession reaches alarming levels. The Star, April 27, 2005. 
http://www.thestar.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=129&fArticleId=2498415  
 
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J. & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes rimes, 
vocabulary and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence 
from a longitudinal study. Development 4, (40), 665-681.  
 
Nagy, W.E. & Anderson, R.C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school 
English? Reading Research Quarterly 19, 304-330. 
 
Nagy, W.E. & Herman, P.A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: 
Implications for acquisition and instruction. In McKeown, M. & Curtis, M. (Eds). The Nature 
of Vocabulary Acquisition, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates (pp. 19-35). 
 
Neale, M. D. (1989). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability. Berkshire: NFER-NELSON 
Publishing Co. 
 
Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text 
comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18 
(4), 443-468.  
 
Oakhill, J.V., Cain, K., & Yuill, N.M. (1998). Individual differences in children?s 
comprehension skill: Towards an integrated model. In C. Hulme, C. & Joshi, R.M. (Eds.), 
Reading and spelling: Development and disorder. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 
Associates Inc. 
 
Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., & Parkin, A. (2005). On the nature of differences between skilled and 
Less-skilled comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 9 (2), 8-91.   
 
Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R. & McQuarrie, L. (2004). Articulation rate, naming speed, verbal 
short-term memory, and phonological awareness: Longitudinal predictors of early reading 
development. Scientific Studies in reading, 8, 3-26. 
 88 
 
Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press. 
 
Perfetti, C.A., Beck, L. Bell, & Hughes, C. (1987).  Phonemic knowledge and learning to 
read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 
33, 283-319 
 
Perie, M., Grigg, W.S., & Donahue, P.L. (2005, October). The nation?s report card: 
Reading 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for 
Education Strategies. 
 
Phillips, L.M., Norris, S.P., Osmond, W.C., & Maynard, A.M. (2002). Relative reading 
achievement: A longitudinal study of 187 children from first through sixth grade. Journal of 
Educational Psychology, 94, 3-13 
   
Pianta, R.C. (1990).  Widening the debate on educational reform: Prevention as a viable 
alternative. Exceptional Children 56 (4), 306-313. 
 
Pickering, S. L. (2001). The development of Visuo-spatial working memory. Memory, 9, 
423-432. 
 
PIRLS 2006 international report: the what, where, when and how of the international 
reading literacy study in South Africa. (http://www.jet.org.za/item) .    
 
Pretorius, E. J. (2002). Reading Ability and academic Performance in South Africa: Are we 
fiddling while Rome is burning? Language Matters, 33 (1), 169-196.  
 
Rack, J., Snowling, M., & Oslon, R. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in development 
dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28-53. 
 
Ramus, F. (In press in M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), the new cognitive neurosciences (3rd Ed). 
Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press). The neutral basis of reading acquisition. 
 
Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental 
child Psychology, 75, 321-339. 
 89 
 
Riddick, B., Sterling, C., Farmer, M. & Morgan, S. (1999). Self-Esteem and Anxiety in the 
Educational Histories of Adult Dyslexia Students. Dyslexia, 5, 227-248.  
 
Sadock, B. J. & Sadock, V. A. (2003). Kaplin and Sadock?s synopsis of psychiatry: 
behavioral sciences/ clinical psychiatry (19th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & 
Wilkins Publishers. 
 
Savage, R. S., Cornish, K., Manly, T., & Hollis, C. (2006). Cognitive processes in children?s 
reading and  attention: The role of working memory, divided attention and response 
inhibition. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 365-385. 
 
Scarborough, H.S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child 
Development, 61, 1728-1743. 
 
Scarborough, H. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: 
Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In Shapiro, B., Accardo, P. 
& Capute, A. (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum. Timonium, MD: 
York (pp. 75 -119). 
 
Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading 
(dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In Neuman, S. & Dickinson, D. (Eds.), 
Handbook of early literacy research New York: Guilford (pp. 97 -110). 
 
Seymour, P. (2000). Socio-economic differences in foundation-level literacy. British 
Journal of Psychology, 91, 145-166. 
 
Share, D. l. & Gur, T. (1999). How reading begins: a study of preschoolers? print 
identification strategies. Cognition and instruction, 17 (2), 177-213. 
 
Shankweiler, D. (1989). How problems of comprehension are related to difficulties in 
word reading. In D. Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. L. (Eds.), Phonology and reading 
disability: Solving the reading puzzle. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press (pp. 35?68). 
 
Shaywitz, S.E. (1996).  Dyslexia. Scientific American, 275 (5), 98-104. 
 90 
 
Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., Pugh,K.R., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, 
R.K., Bronen, R.A., Fletcher, J.M., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L. & Gore, J. C. (1995). Sex 
differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 373, 607-609. 
  
Shibley, H. J. & Marcia, L. (1988). Gender difference in verbal ability: A meta- analysis. 
National Science Foundation, Washington DC. 
 
Siegel, L.S. (1993). Phonological processing deficits as the basis of a reading disability. 
Developmental Review, 13, 246-257. 
 
Siegel, L.S., & Faux, D. (1989). Acquisition of certain grapheme-phoneme 
correspondences in normally achieving and disabled readers. Reading and Writing: An 
Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 37-52.  
  
Siegel, L.S., & Ryan, E. B. (1988). Development of grammatical sensitivity, phonological 
and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children. 
Developmental Psychology, 24, 28-37.   
 
Simmons, D., Coyne, M., Kwok, O., McDonagh, S., Horn, B., & Kame?enui. (2008). 
Indexing response to intervention: A longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten 
through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 143-158.  
 
Smith, M.K. (1941). Measurement of the size of general English vocabulary through the 
elementary grades and high school. Genetic Psychological Monograph 24, 311-345. 
 
Springer, P.E. (2007). The child who is not doing well at school. 
http://www.cmej.org.za/index.php/cmej/article/view/119/53  
 
Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in young 
Children. National Academy Press, Washington DC. 
 
Snowling, M.J. (1980). The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in 
normal and dyslexia readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 294-305.  
 
 91 
Spooner, A. L. R., Badderley, A. D. & Gathercole, S. E. (2004). Can reading accuracy and 
comprehension be separated in the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability?  British Journal of 
Educational Psychology, 74, 187-204. 
 
Stage, S. A., Abbot, R. D., Jenkins, J. R.  & Berninger, V. W. (2003). Predicting Response 
to Early Reading intervention from verbal IQ, Reading-Related Language abilities, 
Attention Ratings, and Verbal IQ- Word Reading Discrepancy. Journal of Learning 
Discrepancy, 36 (1), 24-33. 
 
Stanovich, K.E. (1986).  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual 
differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly 21, 360-407. 
 
Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexia and garden 
variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning 
Disabilities, 21, 590-604, 612.   
 
Stothard, S.E., & Hulme, C. (1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children: The 
role of language comprehension and working memory skills. Reading and Writing, 4, 245?
 256. 
 
Stothard, S. F. & Hulme, C. (1996). A comparison of reading comprehension and decoding 
in children. England: Whurr Publishers. 
 
Stuart, M. & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages? 
Cognition, 30, 139-181. 
 
Taylor, J.M. 2002. Exploring the Phono-Graphix Reading Method with adult second 
language learners. Unpublished Educationis thesis, University of Witwatersrand, 
Johannesburg. 
 
The Khar ri gude mass literacy campaign (http://www.kharigude.co.za.) retrieved 
(09/10/2008). 
 
The importance of Literacy (http://www.essaysample.com) retrieved (2008/12/08).  
 
 92 
Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Koller, O. & Baumert, J. (2006). Self-esteem, academic self 
concept, and achievement: how the learning environment moderates the dynamics of self-
 concept. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90 (2), 334-349. 
 
Unesco statistics [http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php]   
 
Van Eeden, R. (1991). Manual for the South African Individual Scale ? Revised (SSAIS-R). 
Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council. 
  
Vandeyar, S. (2005). Conflicting Demands: Assessment Practices in 3 S.A. Primary 
Schools Undergoing Desegregation. Wiley Interscience 35 (4), 461-481.    
 
Wagner, R., & Torgesen, J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its casual 
role in the acquisition of reading skills.  Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212. 
 
Watkins, M.W., Glutting, J.J. & Lei, P. (2007). Validity of the Full-Scale IQ when there is 
significant variability among WISC-III and WISC-IV factor. Scores, 14 (1), 13-20.    
 
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children ? Fourth Edition: Manual. 
New York: The Psychological Corporation. 
 
Werner, D. (1996). Disabled village children. California: The Hesperion Foundation. 
 
Wimmer, H., Lnderl, K., Linortner, R & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic 
awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than prediction but still important. 
Cognition, 40, 219-249. 
 
Wren, S. (2003). Methods of Assessing Cognitive Aspects of Early Reading Development. 
The Southwest Education Development Laboratory. (http://www.sedl.org)  
 
Wrong Diagnosis (April, 2005). Statistics by country for Learning Disabilities (2004). 
http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/l/learning-disabilities/stats-country.htm.  
 
 
 
 93 
 
Appendix A 
                                                                                                  
UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND 
PSYCHOLOGY 
SCHOOL OF HUMAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 
Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa. Telephone: +27 11-717-4500/2/3/4. Fax: +27-11-717-4559                          
 
To Mr. Swanepoel 
 
My name is Sunita Patel and I am a Masters Psychology student at the University of the 
Witwatersrand. I am researching reading ability in beginner readers for the practical component of 
my course this year. I would like to invite your school to participate in this project. 
 
The aim of this research is to identify the relationship between the WISC-IV subtests and reading 
ability. Participation will involve the administration of two tests, one of reading ability and the other 
of general ability. The tests will be administered in two sessions each lasting about 20 minutes and 
they are presented as fun ?projects/tasks?, they should not have any adverse effects on the children 
and are not related in any way to the school curriculum. Participation in the test is voluntary and the 
children will be able to withdraw from the test at any time without any consequences or prejudice. 
 
Please be assured that absolute confidentiality and anonymity is guaranteed, as all the answer sheets 
will be coded. No child will be individually identified in any written or spoken report and all 
information will be used exclusively for research purposes and will not be shown to anyone but the 
researchers. Confidentiality is also ensured since only group trends will be determined, from which 
it will be provided to the school in the form of general patterns in this particular grade. 
 
Thank you for your interest and please do not hesitate to contact me on 0723763275 or email 
email4sunita@gmail.com if you should want more details or my supervisor Dr. Kate Cockcroft at 
011 717-4511 or email kate.cockcroft@wits.ac.za .  
 
 
Yours sincerely 
Sunita Patel                                                                    Kate Cockcroft 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 94 
 
Appendix B 
                                                                                                    
UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND 
PSYCHOLOGY 
SCHOOL OF HUMAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 
Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa. Telephone: +27 11-717-4500/2/3/4. Fax: +27-11-717-4559                          
 
Dear Parent/Guardian 
 
My name is Sunita Patel and I am a Masters Psychology student at the University of the 
Witwatersrand. I am researching reading ability in beginner readers for the practical component of 
my course this year. I would like to invite your son/daughter to participate in this project. 
 
The aim of this research is to identify the relationship between the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for 
Children-Fourth edition (WISC-IV) subtests and reading ability. The WISC-IV is an 
intelligence test for children.  
 
Participation will involve the administration of two tests, one of reading ability and the other of 
general ability. The tests will be administered in two sessions each lasting about 20 minutes and 
they are presented as fun ?projects/tasks?, they should not have any adverse effects on your 
son/daughter and are not related in any way to the school curriculum. Dr. Samuels has granted 
permission for the tasks to be completed during the school day on the school premises, at a time, 
which is not detrimental to your child?s well being or education. Please note that participation in the 
test is voluntary and that your child will be able to withdraw from the test at any time without any 
consequences or prejudice. You may refuse consent for your child to participate, if you so wish. 
 
 
 
Please be assured that absolute confidentiality is guaranteed, all the answer sheets will be 
coded. No child will be individually identified in any written or spoken report and all information 
will be used exclusively for research purposes and will not be shown to anyone but the researchers. 
 95 
Confidentiality is also ensured since only group trends will be determined, from which it will be 
provided to the school in the form of general patterns in this particular grade. 
Thank you for your interest and please do not hesitate to contact me on 0723763275 or email 
email4sunita@gmail.com if you should want more details or my supervisor Dr. Kate Cockcroft at 
011 717-4511 or email katecockcroft@wits.ac.za . If you are willing to allow your child to 
participate in the study, please discuss the study with him or her and if you are both willing to 
participate, please sign the attached form and return it to the class teacher at your earliest 
convenience. Due to time constraints, it is unfortunately only possible to include the first fifty 
replies in this research. 
 
Yours sincerely 
Sunita Patel 
 
 
I,  
?????????????????????????? (parent/guardian) 
of??????????????????????????.. (child?s name),  have discussed 
this study with my child and hereby give consent for him/her to participate in it. By agreeing to 
participate in this research, I acknowledge the confidentiality and anonymity of the test. As the test 
participation is completely voluntary he/she may withdraw at any time. I understand that all the 
information gained during the research is completely confidential and will not be discussed to 
anyone besides the researchers. 
 
 
???????????..                                   ?????????........                      
Signature                                                                   Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 96 
Appendix C 
                                                                                                  
UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND 
PSYCHOLOGY 
SCHOOL OF HUMAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 
Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa. Telephone: +27 11-717-4500/2/3/4. Fax: +27-11-717-4559                          
 
Biographical Questionnaire 
 
Name of Child: ____________________________________________________ 
Date of Birth: _______________________Gender:________________________ 
1. Has your child repeated a grade? 
_____________________________________________________________________ 
2. If yes, which grade? 
_____________________________________________________________________ 
3. Has your child been diagnosed with any Language; Speech or Auditory problems? 
_____________________________________________________________________ 
4. If yes, what are they? 
_____________________________________________________________________ 
5. What is his/her home language? 
____________________________________________________________________ 
6. Occupation of father? 
_____________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
7. Occupation of mother? 
 97 
_____________________________________________________________________ 
8. Do you read to your child at home? 
_____________________________________________________________________ 
9. How often do you read to your child? 
_____________________________________________________________________ 
10. Who listens to your child read his/her reading homework? 
_____________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 98 
Appendix D 
                                                                                                  
UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND 
PSYCHOLOGY 
SCHOOL OF HUMAN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 
Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa. Telephone: +27 11-717-4500/2/3/4. Fax: +27-11-717-4559                          
 
Child?s letter of assent ? to be signed on the day of the testing 
 
Dear??????. 
 
Thank you for agreeing to do this project with me. I am at university and am doing this assignment 
for one of my subjects. 
 
I will do two fun tasks with you. First, we will do one task, then we will have a break and have 
something to eat and drink and them we will carry on again for a little while. 
If you get tired or don?t feel like carrying on you can stop at any time you like. 
 
Thank you for helping me with this project. 
 
I??????????????(child?s name) would like to do this experiment and know that I 
can stop at any time if I don?t feel like carrying on. 
 
 
 
??????????.                                      ???????????.. 
Signed             Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 99 
 
Appendix E: Histograms for all subtests and components of measures. 
 
 
Distribution of sample for Digit Span subtest of the WISC-IV. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 100 
Distribution of sample for Similarities subtest of the WISC-IV. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 101 
Distribution of sample for Vocabulary subtest of the WISC-IV. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 102 
Distribution of sample for Comprehension subtest of the WISC-IV. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 103 
Distribution of sample for Word Reasoning subtest of the WISC-IV. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 104 
Distribution of sample for Accuracy component of the Neale-R. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 105 
Distribution of sample for Rate component of the Neale-R. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 106 
Distribution of sample for Comprehension component of the Neale-R. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 107 
 
Appendix F