Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-023-02709-9 BRIEF REPORT A map of white matter tracts in a lesser ape, the lar gibbon Katherine L. Bryant1,2  · Paul R. Manger3  · Mads F. Bertelsen4  · Alexandre A. Khrapitchev5  · Jérôme Sallet1,6  · R. Austin Benn1,7  · Rogier B. Mars1,8 Received: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 September 2023 / Published online: 31 October 2023 © The Author(s) 2023 Abstract The recent development of methods for constructing directly comparable white matter atlases in primate brains from diffusion MRI allows us to probe specializations unique to humans, great apes, and other primate taxa. Here, we constructed the first white matter atlas of a lesser ape using an ex vivo diffusion-weighted scan of a brain from a young adult (5.5 years) male lar gibbon. We find that white matter architecture of the gibbon temporal lobe suggests specializations that are reminiscent of those previously reported for great apes, specifically, the expansion of the arcuate fasciculus and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus in the temporal lobe. Our findings suggest these white matter expansions into the temporal lobe were present in the last common ancestor to hominoids approximately 16 million years ago and were further modified in the great ape and human lineages. White matter atlases provide a useful resource for identifying neuroanatomical differences and similarities between humans and other primate species and provide insight into the evolutionary variation and stasis of brain organization. Keywords Fasciculus · Tractography · DWI · Hominoid · Evolution Introduction Knowledge of the structure of lesser ape brains is critical to understanding the evolution of great ape brains, includ- ing humans. Comparative anatomy of rare species such as apes has greatly benefited from advances in structural neuroimaging, which now enables collection of high qual- ity data from post-mortem fixed brains (Mars et al. 2014). Among others, diffusion MRI has enabled the production of white matter atlases of the brains of the macaque mon- key (Schmahmann et al. 2007), squirrel monkey (Gao et al. 2016), and chimpanzee (Bryant et al. 2020). Although a few * Katherine L. Bryant katherine.bryant@univ-amu.fr Paul R. Manger Paul.Manger@wits.ac.za Mads F. Bertelsen mfb@zoo.dk Alexandre A. Khrapitchev alexandr.khrapichev@perspectum.com Jérôme Sallet jerome.sallet@inserm.fr R. Austin Benn r.austinbenn@gmail.com Rogier B. Mars rogier.mars@donders.ru.nl 1 Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 2 Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France 3 School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa 4 Centre for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg, Denmark 5 Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 6 Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute, Université Lyon 1, Inserm, Bron, France 7 Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Université de Paris, CNRS, Paris, France 8 Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-4543 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-2854 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2109-1226 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7616-6635 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7878-0209 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3728-7036 http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6302-8631 http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s00429-023-02709-9&domain=pdf 1840 Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 investigations into the morphometry and neural organization of the lesser apes have been undertaken (Apfelbach 1972; Schoenemann et al. 2005; de Sousa et al. 2010; Swiegers et al. 2019), thus far no study has examined the white mat- ter tracts. Here, we provide a white matter atlas for the lar gibbon, a hylobatid which diverged from a common ancestor with humans approximately 16.8 million years ago (Carbone et al. 2014). The atlas was constructed by identifying major white matter fiber tracts based on standardized anatomical land- marks that are directly comparable to previous studies in the human, chimpanzee, and macaque monkey brain (Mars et al. 2018b; Bryant et al. 2020). As in previous studies, these anatomical landmarks were used to create tractography ‘recipes’: a group of masks forming the seed, target, and exclusion regions of interest for a tractography algorithm to reconstruct the desired tract (Mars et al. 2018b; War- rington et al. 2020). The goal of these recipes is twofold. First, they are general enough to identify a tract of interest in every individual. Second, the masks are chosen such that the tractography is also selective to the tracts of interest. These protocols can be easily transformed to the space of individual scans in different datasets. It is the explicit goal of producing a library of tractography recipes that future modifications are easy to incorporate into the atlas and that interested researchers can easily test out alternative protocols to compare claims between rival definitions of a tract. A specialized tool, compatible with our data, is available for implementing these recipes (Warrington et al. 2020). We employ these recipes to reconstruct a comprehensive set of 24 major white matter tracts in an ex vivo diffusion- weighted MRI dataset of a young adult (5.5 years) male lar gibbon brain using probabilistic tractography. We discuss the organization of major white matter fibers and their pattern of cortical terminations in the gibbon and compare them with our previously results in great apes and Old World monkeys. We observed that the gibbon temporal cortex shows hints of organizational principles previously identified as great ape specializations. Results Sulcal anatomy We first reconstructed the cortical surface of the gibbon brain and performed sulcal labeling using the nomenclature of Petrides (2011) to provide a first reference frame for this brain. The gibbon sulcal and gyral morphology shares traits with both great apes (hominids) and Old World monkeys (OWM). Like the macaque, frontal cortex features a promi- nent principal sulcus running along the dorsolateral pre- frontal cortex. Unlike in macaques or in humans, an arcuate sulcus or an inferior precentral sulcus is not present at the posterior limit of the PS. A segmented superior frontal sul- cus (sfs-a, sfsp) is found in the dorsal prefrontal cortex. As in hominids, the posterior branch of the superior frontal sulcus joins the superior branch of the precentral sulcus. Also like hominids, orbital sulci (los and mos) are present, here visible along either side of the frontal operculum. Moving posteriorly, gibbon parietal cortex has features that are intermediate between hominids and Old World mon- keys. Like the macaque, the most prominent sulcus is a large intraparietal sulcus (ips) which originates posterior to the central sulcus, terminating orthogonal to the lunate sulcus. Notably, postcentral sulcus is not present. The caudal ramus of the superior temporal sulcus (sts-a) extends past the ter- minus of the lateral fissure and into inferior parietal cortex, nearly connecting with ips, similar to the macaque who lacks an angular or supramarginal gyrus separating the two sulci. In the gibbon, this sts extension is oriented vertically, unlike hominids or OWM, owing to the greater angle of the tem- poral lobe with respect to the parietal lobe. The prominent sts ramus (sts-a) is intermediate to the ascending ramus of the macaque sts and the complex observed branching of the sts in chimpanzees (Falk et al. 2018) and in humans (Ochiai et al. 2004). Gibbon temporal cortex has a combination of OWM, hominid, and unique features. In addition to the sts, gibbon temporal lobe features an inferior occipital sulcus (locs) that reaches anteriorly past the posterior termini of the sts and its rami, further anterior than in humans (e.g., Malikovic et al. 2012) and more similar to macaques. The inferior temporal sulcus (its), previously suggested to be a hominid evolution- ary innovation (Bryant and Preuss 2018), is visible in the lar gibbon as a small, shallow sulcus anterior to locs, sug- gesting this characteristic feature of great ape temporal lobe organization originated in the hominoid lineage. Like both OWM and hominids, the gibbon possesses an occipitotem- poral sulcus (lots) in the ventral temporal lobe. An additional sulcus, the collateral sulcus (cos), runs medially to the lateral occipitotemporal sulcus in the gibbon (see Connolly 1950), which is also found in chimpanzees (Miller et al. 2020) and humans (e.g., Malikovic et al. 2012). In chimpanzees, the gyrus between these two sulci has been proposed to be homologous to the human fusiform gyrus and a possible hominoid innovation (Bryant and Preuss 2018). Occipital cortex in the gibbon features a prominent lunate sulcus on the lateral surface, which is common to Old World anthropoids (although variable and often absent in humans (Malikovic et al. 2012)) and exhibits the characteristic pri- mate calcarine sulcus medially. Unlike macaques, the gib- bon occipital cortex features numerous sulci on the lateral surface, including a branched lateral calcarine sulcus (eccs) first identified by Connolly (1950). By contrast, chimpanzees and humans possess a lateral occipital sulcus separating the 1841Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 area into superior and inferior occipital gyri, while humans have an additional sulcus, the transverse occipital sulcus (Fig. 1). White matter tracts We created tractography recipes to reconstruct 24 tracts in the lar gibbon brain (Fig. 2). Our approach is to use ana- tomical landmarks to identify the bodies of tracts and sub- sequently guide tractography to reconstruct the tracts’ full path. Importantly, tractography allows the reconstruction of large white matter fiber bundles but does not necessarily respect synaptic boundaries. Thus, results obtained using this approach might best be compared to those obtained using blunt dissections, rather than tracer data. This approach of reconstructing tracts based on identification of the tract body has in the past proven robust (Thiebaut de Schotten et al. 2012; Mars et al. 2018a, b; Folloni et al. 2019), and does not suffer from the disadvantages commonly associated with tractography approaches that aim to mimic tracer data (Reveley et al. 2015; Donahue et al. 2016). We discuss the course of the tracts below. Note that the tract protocols were defined to be as similar as possible to those previously described in other species (Mars et al. 2019; Bryant et al. 2020; Warrington et al. 2020), albeit adjusted for gibbon anatomy. We therefore aim to describe the results in the same terminology where possible, to allow the reader to form the best possible comparisons across species. In Fig. 1 Sulcal boundaries in the lar gibbon with comparative anatomy in macaques and chimpanzees. A Coronal sections showing diffusion and grey matter at six locations throughout the brain. B Gibbon cor- tical surface reconstruction with sulcal labeling. C Macaque (three subject average from Roumazeilles et al. (2022)), gibbon, and chim- panzee (single subject from Roumazeilles et al. (2020)) for compar- ison. ccs calcarine sulcus, cgs cingulate sulcus, mcgs margin of the cingulate sulcus, cos collateral sulcus, cs central sulcus, eccs exter- nal calcarine sulcus, ifs inferior frontal sulcus, iprs inferior precentral sulcus, ips intraparietal sulcus, its inferior temporal sulcus, lus lunate sulcus, lf lateral fissure, locs lateral occipital sulcus, lots lateral occip- itotemporal sulcus, mos medial orbital sulcus, sprs superior precentral sulcus, pof parieto-occipital fissure, ps principal sulcus, sfs-a superior frontal sulcus—anterior ramus, sfsp superior frontal sulcus—poste- rior ramus, sts superior temporal sulcus, sts-a superior temporal sul- cus—ramus Please note that certain pages of this article have been removed in order to reduce the file size so that the PDF can be uploaded on the system (the system has a limit of 1MB for files and several PDF files are larger than this). The first and last pages of each paper (with full bibliographic details and affiliations) are included. If the entire unredacted paper is required, this can be emailed directly to whomever requires them by contacting Dr. Busisiwe Maseko on Busisiwe.Maseko@wits.ac.za mailto:Paul.Manger@wits.ac.za 1847Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 chance for others to build upon and improve our protocols, and will aid in solving disputes of tract identifications. In the next sections, we will discuss how the tracts iden- tified by our recipes can enrich our understanding of white matter evolution in humans and apes and explore some possible functional implications for the observed similari- ties and differences; however, in-depth quantitative inves- tigations comparing white matter architecture of the gib- bon with that of other species will be reserved for future communications. Our findings indicate that the temporal connections of the gibbon arcuate fasciculus reach further anteriorly in STG than in macaques, and include connections into sts, similar to chimpanzees (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the gibbon arcuate fasciculus reaches even further anteriorly in STG than has previously been described in chimpanzees both in averaged results (Bryant et al. 2020) and on an individual level (Fig. S2). The most parsimonious explanation is that temporal expansions to the arcuate fasciculus were present in the last common ancestor to hominoids approximately 16 million years ago and were further modified in the great ape and human lineages. Alternatively, it could suggest a convergent evolution of the arcuate fasciculus in two of the many extant and extinct hominoid species, lar gibbons and humans. In humans, the arcuate fasciculus is critical to language processing, and the ability of chimpanzees and bonobos to acquire some semantic comprehension and manual language production (Gardner and Gardner 1969; Fouts 1973; Savage-Rumbaugh et al. 1986) suggests that the more extensive STG connectivity of the arcuate fasciculus in these species compared with macaques may facilitate these abilities. Experimental language studies have not been car- ried out in gibbons, but analysis of wild gibbons’ calls indi- cates the presence of precursors to syntax and semantic pro- cessing; the former in the form of combinatorial hierarchical structuring (Inoue et al. 2017) and the latter in the form of referential signaling (Clarke et al. 2006). The human-unique expansion of arcuate fasciculus connectivity in humans to include middle and inferior portions of the temporal lobe is likely related to the human capacity for semantic richness and syntactic complexity. The structure of the gibbon arcu- ate fasciculus described here suggests the initial expansions of this fasciculus, a required foundation for human language, originated in hominoid expansions of the arcuate fasciculus into STG and sts. Dorsal longitudinal tracts belonging to the SLF were identified running between the parietal and frontal cortex. In most anthropoid primates to date, the SLF is subdivided into three distinct branches that form parallel pathways between the parietal and frontal cortex (Thiebaut de Schotten et al. 2011). We see a similar organization in the gibbon: the pari- etal cortex in the gibbon is quite convoluted, with the upris- ing branch of the STS into the inferior parietal lobule par- ticularly noticeable. Terminations of the SLF were detected both anteriorly and posteriorly of this branch, indicating it is not likely to be a demarcation of parietal cortex. Rather, the lunate sulcus seems to be a better landmark for this; in gibbons it is rotated such that it is oriented more vertically than in chimpanzees or macaques. The ILF is a visual association pathway connecting occipital regions with ventral temporal association areas. Previously, a hominid-unique component, ILF-lateral, was Fig. 11 Summary of findings in evolutionary context 1848 Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 identified (Roumazeilles et al. 2020), following earlier dis- section work in the human (Latini et al. 2017). ILF-medial, found in macaques as well as great apes, runs along the ITG, but ILF-lateral expands laterally into the white matter of MTG in hominids. Here, we find that gibbons have an ILF organization reminiscent of that of the great apes, suggest- ing ILF-lateral expansion occurred in the hominoid lineage (Fig. 5B). Reconstruction of ILF-medial and ILF-lateral in gibbon, alongside humans and chimpanzees, further sup- ported the interpretation that gibbon ILF, like hominids, comprise dissociable subcomponents (Fig. S3) Combined with the presence of the cos, this suggests hominoids pos- sess a series of temporal lobe modifications for visual object processing unique to the lineage. Finally, we observed that the forceps major in gibbon branches into distinct dorsal and ventral occipital compo- nents (Fig. 8), unlike humans and to a greater degree than observed in macaques and chimpanzees (Fig. S2, Bryant et al. 2020). Given the unique angle of parietal to temporal cortex observed in gibbons, this gross morphological differ- ence may be due to vertical lengthening of occipital cortex in gibbons, and when compared to humans, possibly com- pounded by the compression of these branches by parietal expansion occurring in the human lineage (Bruner 2018). Our gibbon dataset was based on a single, relatively young, male individual. Our results should  therefore be read as preliminary and awaiting confirmation in a larger sample. However, given the importance of adding data from the lesser apes to the emerging picture of primate connec- tivity, we felt it important to communicate these results. These results can be added to the increasing library of white matter maps of the primate brain. Apart from the human, chimpanzee, and macaque results referred to earlier, these also include partial atlases in other great apes, Old and New World monkeys, and prosimians (Roumazeilles et al. 2020, 2022; Bryant et al. 2021). Diffusion MRI tractography has several advantages for comparative neuroscience research but has some important differences when directly compared to more traditional neu- roscientific methods. Studies comparing tract tracing with diffusion tractography in ex vivo macaques have found com- parable results (Jbabdi et al. 2013; Azadbakht et al. 2015; van den Heuvel et al. 2015; Donahue et al. 2016), and high angular resolution approaches have successfully been used on difficult-to-reconstruct tracts such as the acoustic radia- tion (Berman et al. 2013). Tractography can produce false positives, and the best approach to mitigate this is the use of strong anatomical priors (Maier-Hein et al. 2017). As in previous studies (Bryant et al. 2020), we use standardized protocols based on strong anatomical knowledge from other species, including those for which a wealth of tracer data is available. To guard against false negatives, these data can be compared with results from data-driven methods; for example, in chimpanzees, anatomically-driven and data- driven approaches produce comparable results (Mars et al. 2019). Connectivity is of course but one aspect of brain organi- zation on which to compare different species. It has proven a useful measure, as connectivity is generally considered to be important for function and can be compared reliably across species (Mars et al. 2018a, b). Another modality that has been employed in recent large-scale comparative studies is that of cortical folding patterns. Within primates, brain size predicted gyrification patterns better than evolutionary lineage (Heuer et al. 2019). Although cortical folding does not speak to the internal organization of the brain, a number of comparative studies have suggested cortical folds are a reliable metric to chart brain evolution (Amiez et al. 2019; Miller and Weiner 2022). Ultimately, comparative neurosci- ence will benefit from direct comparisons across levels of brain organization, as was recently done in a study compar- ing tissue properties and connectivity in the primate tempo- ral lobe (Eichert et al. 2020). In summary, our results suggest that gibbon white mat- ter tracts share features with chimpanzees and humans not found in rhesus macaques. Specifically, the gibbon brain demonstrates expansions of the AF into the STG and sts, and the ILF into lateral temporal cortex, unlike what has pre- viously been observed in cercopithecoid monkeys. Similar modifications to the AF and ILF have been observed in great apes (Rilling et al. 2008; Bryant et al. 2020; Roumazeilles et al. 2020), suggesting that these fascicular specializations appeared over 16 mya, prior to divergences within the homi- noid lineage. This gibbon white matter atlas is presented as a resource and a starting point for future quantitative and comparative analyses. Future work will take advantage of this atlas and accompanying tract recipes to reconstruct tracts in hylobatid species and populations, to use as a reference to create trac- tography protocols for other primate species, and to probe in more detail the neuroanatomical adaptations unique to humans and great apes. Materials and methods Data Scan protocols were similar to those in our previous com- munications for post-mortem small primate brains (Bry- ant et al. 2021; Roumazeilles et al. 2022). Diffusion MRI scans of a male lar gibbon (Hylobates lar; n = 1, body mass: 5.5 kg, brain mass: 112 g, 5.5 years old) were acquired in a were acquired locally on a 7 T magnet with an Agilent DirectDrive console (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a 2D diffusion-weighted spin-echo protocol 1849Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 with single line readout (DW-SEMS, TE/TR: 25 ms/10 s; Matrix = 128 × 128; number of slices: 128; resolution: 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 mm; diffusion data were acquired over the course of ~ 52.5 h). Eight non-diffusion-weighted (b = 0 s/ mm2) and one hundred twenty-eight diffusion-weighted (b = 4000 s/mm2) volumes were acquired with diffusion directions distributed over the whole sphere. The brain was soaked in PBS before scanning and placed in fluorinert dur- ing the scan. The brain was obtained from Copenhagen Zoo, Denmark, where the animal was euthanized for management reasons, unrelated to this study (Bertelsen 2018). Follow- ing euthanasia, the carotid arteries were cannulated, and the head was perfused with an initial rinse of 0.9% saline solution at a temperature of 4 ºC followed by 4% paraform- aldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) at 4 ºC. The brain was removed from the skull and post-fixed in 4% paraform- aldehyde in 0.1 M PB (24 h at 4 ºC). Scan data were converted to NIFTI format, reoriented to approximate AC/PC orientation with the origin set at the middle of the anterior commissure, and preprocessed using tools from FSL (www. fmrib. ox. ac. uk/ fsl). These steps are implemented in the ‘phoenix’ module of the MR Compara- tive Anatomy Toolbox (Mr Cat; www. neuro ecolo gylab. org). We used bedpostX to fit a crossing fiber model to each dataset (Behrens et al. 2007), allowing up to three fiber ori- entations per voxel. This tool produces voxel-wise posterior distributions of fiber orientations that are subsequently used for probabilistic tractography. Surface reconstruction The gibbon cortical surface was reconstructed from the structural scans using a customized pipeline based on Free- Surfer v6.0 (Fischl 2012). Processing steps included tissue segmentation of grey and white matter, identification of subcortical structures, and surface reconstruction. To obtain successful reconstructions of the non-human primate brains, the FreeSurfer pipeline was complemented with tools from FSL v6.0.1 (Jenkinson et al. 2012), ANTs (Avants et al. 2011), and MATLAB (2017a, The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States). Diffusion images containing samples from the distribu- tion on anisotropic volume fraction (mean_f1samples in FSL terminology) were adjusted to obtain a T1-like contrast with low voxel intensities in gray matter voxels and high intensities in white matter voxels. Tissue segmentation was performed using FreeSurfer with manual corrections where necessary to correct segmentations of white matter, cerebel- lum, and subcortical structures. Surfaces were converted to GIFTI format and a mid-thickness surface was created by averaging the pial and white matter border surfaces. For display purposes, the mid-thickness surface was smoothed (strength 0.5, 15 iterations) using the Workbench Command tools of Connectome Workbench (Marcus et al. 2011). Tractography Probabilistic diffusion tractography was performed using FSL’s probtrackx2 (Behrens et al. 2007). Recipes consist- ing of seed, waypoint (target), exclusion, and/or stop masks for each white matter tract of interest were drawn in vol- ume space of the gibbon following the approach previously established for the human and macaque (Mars et al. 2018a, b; Warrington et al. 2020). Details of these protocols follow in the next section. Tractography was run in two directions (seed to target and target to seed) with the following param- eters: each seed voxel was sampled 10,000 times, with a cur- vature threshold of 0.3, step length of 0.5 mm, and a number of steps of 3200. The resulting tractograms were normal- ized by dividing by the waypoint number and thresholded at 0.0005. Results were visualized with Matlab (MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release 2012b, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States). Tractography recipes Protocols are described below and are defined as similarly as possible as those previously defined for other primates (Mars et al. 2018b; Bryant et al. 2020; Warrington et al. 2020), while adjusted for gibbon anatomy. In accordance with journal policy, we therefore note there might be some recycling of text of those previous publications were appro- priate. Unless noted otherwise, all protocols included a bilat- eral exclusion mask consisting of a sagittal section isolating tracts within the two hemispheres with the exception of the middle cerebellar peduncle and anterior commissure. Dorsal tracts Superior longitudinal fasciculi and arcuate fasciculus The arcuate fasciculus (AF) was reconstructed with a one seed, two target “wayorder” approach, in which target ROIs were specified in a particular order (seed to target 1, then target 1 to target 2). Here, a large seed was drawn in coronal section just posterior to the posterior terminus of the ps and extending from the frontal operculum to the los, while target 1 was placed in coronal section superior to the posterior limit of the lf and target 2 in horizontal section in the white matter of the superior temporal gyrus (STG; Fig. 2A). A stop mask was drawn in the area encompassing the auditory core to avoid contamination from the acoustic radiation (Fig. 2A). Superior longitudinal fasciculi (SLFs) were reconstructed using a one seed, two target approach, in which the seed ROI was drawn in the center of the tract and a target ROI http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl http://www.neuroecologylab.org http://www.neuroecologylab.org 1850 Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 was drawn at the anterior and posterior ends of the tract (Figs. 2B-D). For SLF I, the seed was drawn slightly anterior to the central sulcus, in the white matter inferior to sprs, with one target in the medial to the sprs and a posterior target, the white matter of parietal cortex medial to the dorsal limit of ips (Fig. 1B). SLF II involved a seed mask anterior and deep to the central sulcus, with target masks in the white matter deep to and between the sfsp and ps and inferior and posterior to the ips, between sts-a and lus (Fig. 2C). For SLF III, the seed was placed in the white matter posterior the cs, with a target in the white matter inferior to the ps and superior to the posterior terminus of the lf (Fig. 2D). Dorsal tract protocols employed exclusion masks that excluded the basal ganglia (Fig. 2B). Temporal tracts Middle longitudinal fasciculus MdLF was reconstructed using a seed in STG, slightly anterior to the central sulcus, and a target also in the STG, just anterior to the posterior terminus of the Sylvian fis- sure (Fig. 2E). Exclusion masks were inferior to sts and in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 2E, to prevent contamination with ILF and IFOF. Inferior longitudinal fasciculus The seed mask was located in a coronal section below sts just posterior to the temporal pole, and the target mask was located in a coronal section inferior to sts and superior, medial, and inferior to the anterior end of the locs (Fig. 2F). Exclusion masks were placed in coronal sections of the STG (Fig. 2F. Inferior fronto‑occipital fasciculus IFOF recipes consisted of a large coronal slice in the occipi- tal lobe at the level of the lus for the seed and a coronal slice in the prefrontal cortex, just anterior to the genu of the cor- pus callosum, for the target (Fig. 2G). To restrict streamlines to those that pass through the extreme/external capsule, a large exclusion mask was drawn as a coronal slice with two lacunae at the extreme/external capsule (Fig. 2G). Uncinate fasciculus Like the IFOF protocol, the uncinate protocol also used a large coronal exclusion mask with lacunae at the extreme/ external capsule. The seed was placed in the white matter close to the temporal pole and the target was drawn in the extreme/external capsule (Fig. 2H). A second exclusion mask was placed posterior to the basal ganglia to prevent contamination from longitudinal fibers from the IFOF. Limbic tracts Cingulum bundle This tract was divided into three separate protocols—cin- gulum dorsal (CBD), cingulum peri-genual (CBP), and cin- gulum temporal (CBT). The seed and target for CBD were placed in the cingulate gyrus, at the level of the precuneus and the dorsal part of the genu, respectively (Fig. 2I). The CBP seed mask was placed dorsal to the genu and the target at the ventral terminal point of the genu (Fig. 2I). The CBT recipe involved a seed in the posterior parahippocampal gyrus and one in the anterior parahippocampal gyrus, and two stop masks to avoid picking up occipitotemporal and extreme/external capsule fibers (Fig. 2K). Fornix The fornix protocol included a seed in the mammillary bod- ies and a target in the hippocampal formation (Fig. 2L). In addition to the bilateral exclusion mask, a coronal section of occipital lobe was excluded to avoid contamination from posterior fiber bundles (Fig. 2L). Short tracts Frontal aslant A seed was placed in a parasagittal section at the white mat- ter stem between ps and los, and the seed in an axial sec- tion of white matter medial to SFS (Fig. 2M). The exclusion mask included a coronal slice just posterior to the seed and target masks, to avoid including streamlines from dorsal fas- ciculi (Fig. 2M). Vertical occipital fasciculus The vertical occipital fasciculus (VOF) recipe contains a seed and a target in the white matter of the occipital lobe, medial to the eccs, the seed superior and the target inferior to the fundus of lus (Fig. 2N). An exclusion mask consisting of a coronal section at the level of the posterior temporal lobe was used to avoid the inclusion of longitudinal tracts (Fig. 2N). Corticospinal and somatosensory pathways (CSP) A seed was placed in the central medial portion of the pons, with a target encompassing the superior parietal lobule, inferior parietal lobule, and postcentral gyrus (Fig. 2O). 1851Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 Exclusion masks were placed in an axial section at the level of the midbrain, which excluded streamlines outside of the midbrain/brainstem (Fig. 2O). Interhemispheric tracts Forceps major and minor A seed mask consisting of a coronal slice through one occip- ital lobe, a target mask consisting of a coronal slice through the other occipital lobe, a coronal exclusion mask at approxi- mately the level of the central sulcus, and a sagittal exclusion mask between the occipital lobes were used to reconstruct the forceps major (Fig. 2P). The forceps minor recipe was similar, with target and seed masks in coronal sections of the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 2Q). Anterior commissure A seed was placed at the midline of the anterior commissure and a target in the white matter between the globus pallidus and the putamen, based on descriptions from Dejerine and Dejerine-Klumpke (1895). An exclusion mask was placed superior to the seed and target masks and stop masks were placed posterior to the seed and target masks, to prevent streamline contamination from the rest of the basal ganglia, and in an axial section at the level of the extreme/external capsule, to prevent streamlines from going into the ventral pathway (Fig. 2R). Middle cerebellar peduncle A seed was placed in the white matter stem of one cerebel- lar hemisphere and a target in the opposite (Fig. 2S). An exclusion mask was placed sagittally between the two cer- ebellar hemispheres and axially at the base of the thalamus. (Fig. 2S). Thalamic projections Thalamic radiations Anterior thalamic radiation recipes consisted of an axial seed in the anterior third of the thalamus (Wakana et al. 2007), with a target in the white matter of the prefrontal cor- tex just anterior to the basal ganglia, in the anterior thalamic peduncle (Fig. 2T). An exclusion mask was placed posterior to the thalamus. The superior thalamic radiation protocol consisted of a seed in the superior half of the thalamus, and a target in the precentral and postcentral gyri. Exclusion masks were placed coronally, posterior to the thalamus and anterior to the precentral gyrus (Fig. 2U). To reconstruct the posterior thalamic radiation, a seed in the posterior thalamus and a coronal mask in the occipital lobe were used (Fig. 2V). Exclusion masks were placed anterior and inferior to the thalamus (Fig. 2V). Acoustic and optic radiations For the acoustic and optic radiations, seeds were placed in the medial geniculate nucleus and lateral geniculate nucleus of the thalamus, respectively. A target was placed in the pla- num temporale for the acoustic radiation (Fig. 2W) and as a coronal section at approximately the level of the lunate sulcus for the optic radiation (Fig. 2X). Surface projection maps Cortical surface representations of each tract were created to establish which cortical territories are reached. Since there are known issues of gyal bias and superficial white matter (Reveley et al. 2015; Schilling et al. 2017), when tracking toward the cortical grey matter, we employed a recent approach that aims to address some of these issues by multiplying the tractography results with a whole-brain connectivity matrix (Mars et al. 2018b; Eichert et al. 2019). The above-described tractograms for each tract were normalized and thresholded, resulting in a (tract) x (brain) matrix for each tract. This tractogram matrix was then mul- tiplied by a whole-brain (surface) x (brain) connectivity matrix derived from seeding in the mid-thickness surface and tracking to the rest of the brain. The whole-brain con- nectivity matrix was based on a surface reconstruction of the gibbon brain (5 k vertices). Comparative analyses For analysis purposes, previously developed tractography recipes for AF, FMA, ILF, and CST were used to reconstruct these tracts in humans, chimpanzees, and macaques. These data comprised 32 humans from the Human Connectome Project dataset, 29 chimpanzees from a previously acquired dataset from the Emory National Primate Research Center, and 6 ex vivo rhesus macaques scanned at the University of Oxford (for further information on sample acquisition and scanning protocols, see Bryant et al. 2020). Tractography parameters were identical to the gibbon except for a slightly more conservative curvature threshold (0.2) which has been validated in previous studies of humans and non-human pri- mates (e.g., Warrington et al. 2020). To explore the anatomy of subcomponents of the ILF (ILF-lat and ILF-med, previously described in Roumazeilles et al. 2020), tractography recipes were developed for these ILF segments using anatomical references from the cluster- ing results generated in humans, chimpanzees, and macaques 1852 Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 (Roumazeilles et al. 2020). ILF-lat and ILF-med recipes were then adapted for gibbon. Tractography for gibbon was carried out as described above. In the three non-gibbon primates, individual tracto- grams were thresholded, binarized, and summed, and then visualized with FSLeyes (FSL v6.0.1; Jenkinson et al. 2012) to create heat maps in which whiter shades indicate a greater relative number of individual tractograms that contain voxels in the area; voxels with darker colors are present in relatively few individuals (Fig. S2-3). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplemen- tary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00429- 023- 02709-9. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Shaun War- rington, Saad Jbabdi, and Stam Sotiropolous for their work on XTRACT toolbox and library (fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/XTRACT) which facilitated this project. Author contributions KLB performed the analysis and prepared fig- ures 2-11 and S1-3. KLB and RBM wrote the main manuscript. RBM prepared figure 1. JS identified sulcal landmarks. MFB provided tissue and assisted with the methods section. PRM assisted with tissue acqui- sition and data interpretation. AAK conducted the post-mortem brain scan acquistion. RAB performed surface reconstruction. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Funding The work of KLB and RBM was supported by the Biotech- nology and Biological Science Research Council (BBSRC) UK [BB/ N019814/1]. RBM was supported by the EPA Cephalosporin Fund. The Wellcome Center for Integrative Neuroimaging is supported by Wellcome [203139/Z/16/Z]. Data availability Analysis code, tractography recipes, and results are available at multiple locations indicated on the lab website (www. neuro ecolo gylab. org). Tractography recipes and results will be made avail- able from the WIN gitlab (https:// git. fmrib. ox. ac. uk/ neuro ecolo gylab/ gibbon- tract ograp hy- proto cols); raw data from the Digital Brain Zoo (open.win.ox.ac.uk/DigitalBrainBank/#/datasets/zoo). Analysis code is also part of the MR Comparative Anatomy Toolbox (Mr Cat; Mars et al. (2016)). Declarations Conflict of interest None to declare. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attri- bution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adapta- tion, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. References Amiez C, Sallet J, Hopkins WD, Meguerditchian A, Hadj-Bouziane F, Ben Hamed S, Wilson CRE, Procyk E, Petrides M (2019) Sulcal organization in the medial frontal cortex provides insights into primate brain evolution. Nat Commun 10:1–14 Apfelbach R (1972) Electrically elicited vocalizations in the Gibbon Hylobates lar (Hylobatidae), and their behavioral significance. Z Tierpsychol 30:420–430 Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC (2011) A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage 54:2033–2044 Azadbakht H, Parkes LM, Haroon HA, Augath M, Logothetis NK, de Crespigny A, D’Arceuil HE, Parker GJM (2015) Validation of high-resolution tractography against in vivo tracing in the macaque visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 25:4299–4309 Behrens TEJ, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MFS, Woolrich MW (2007) Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? Neuroimage 34:144–155 Berman JI, Lanza MR, Blaskey L, Edgar JC, Roberts TPL (2013) High angular resolution diffusion imaging probabilistic tractog- raphy of the auditory radiation. Am J Neuroradiol 34:1573–1578 Bertelsen MF (2018) Issues surrounding surplus animals in zoos. Fowler’s zoo and wild animal medicine, current therapy. Else- vier, St Louis, MO, pp 134–137 Bruner E (2018) Human paleoneurology and the evolution of the parietal cortex. Brain Behav Evol 91:136–147 Bryant KL, Li L, Eichert N, Mars RB (2020) A comprehensive atlas of white matter tracts in the chimpanzee. PLoS Biol 18:e3000971 Bryant KL, Ardesch DJ, Roumazeilles L, Scholtens LH, Khrapitchev AA, Tendler BC, Wu W, Miller KL, Sallet J, van den Heuvel MP, Mars RB (2021) Diffusion MRI data, sulcal anatomy, and tractog- raphy for eight species from the Primate Brain Bank. Brain Struct Funct 226:2497–2509 Bryant KL, Preuss TM. 2018. A Comparative Perspective on the Human Temporal Lobe. In: Bruner E,, Ogihara N,, Tanabe HC, editors. Digital Endocasts. Tokyo: Springer Japan. p. 239–258. Carbone L, Alan Harris R, Gnerre S, Veeramah KR, Lorente-Galdos B, Huddleston J, Meyer TJ, Herrero J, Roos C, Aken B, Ana- clerio F, Archidiacono N, Baker C, Barrell D, Batzer MA, Beal K, Blancher A, Bohrson CL, Brameier M, Campbell MS, Capozzi O, Casola C, Chiatante G, Cree A, Damert A, de Jong PJ, Dumas L, Fernandez-Callejo M, Flicek P, Fuchs NV, Gut I, Gut M, Hahn MW, Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Hillier LW, Hubley R, Ianc B, Izs- vák Z, Jablonski NG, Johnstone LM, Karimpour-Fard A, Konkel MK, Kostka D, Lazar NH, Lee SL, Lewis LR, Liu Y, Locke DP, Mallick S, Mendez FL, Muffato M, Nazareth LV, Nevonen KA, O’Bleness M, Ochis C, Odom DT, Pollard KS, Quilez J, Reich D, Rocchi M, Schumann GG, Searle S, Sikela JM, Skollar G, Smit A, Sonmez K, ten Hallers B, Terhune E, Thomas GWC, Ullmer B, Ventura M, Walker JA, Wall JD, Walter L, Ward MC, Wheelan SJ, Whelan CW, White S, Wilhelm LJ, Woerner AE, Yandell M, Zhu B, Hammer MF, Marques-Bonet T, Eichler EE, Fulton L, Fronick C, Muzny DM, Warren WC, Worley KC, Rogers J, Wilson RK, Gibbs RA (2014) Gibbon genome and the fast karyotype evolution of small apes. Nature 513:195–201 Clarke E, Reichard UH, Zuberbühler K (2006) The syntax and meaning of wild gibbon songs. PLoS ONE 1:e73 Connolly CJ (1950) External morphology of the primate brain. Thomas, Springfield de Sousa AA, Sherwood CC, Mohlberg H, Amunts K, Schleicher A, MacLeod CE, Hof PR, Frahm H, Zilles K (2010) Hominoid visual brain structure volumes and the position of the lunate sulcus. J Hum Evol 58:281–292 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-023-02709-9 http://www.neuroecologylab.org http://www.neuroecologylab.org https://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/neuroecologylab/gibbon-tractography-protocols https://git.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/neuroecologylab/gibbon-tractography-protocols http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 1853Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 Dejerine J, Dejerine-Klumpke A (1895) Anatomie des centres nerveux. Rueff et Cie, Paris Donahue CJ, Sotiropoulos SN, Jbabdi S, Hernandez-Fernandez M, Behrens TE, Dyrby TB, Coalson T, Kennedy H, Knoblauch K, Van Essen DC, Glasser MF (2016) Using diffusion tractography to predict cortical connection strength and distance: a quantitative comparison with tracers in the monkey. J Neurosci 36:6758–6770 Eichert N, Verhagen L, Folloni D, Jbabdi S, Khrapitchev AA, Sibson NR, Mantini D, Sallet J, Mars RB (2019) What is special about the human arcuate fasciculus? Lateralization, projections, and expan- sion. Cortex 118:107–115 Eichert N, Robinson EC, Bryant KL, Jbabdi S, Jenkinson M, Li L, Krug K, Watkins KE, Mars RB (2020) Cross-species cortical alignment identifies different types of anatomical reorganization in the primate temporal lobe. Elife 9:e53232 Falk D, Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de León M, Semendeferi K, Alatorre Warren JL, Hopkins WD (2018) Identification of in vivo sulci on the external surface of eight adult chimpanzee brains: implica- tions for interpreting early hominin endocasts. Brain Behav Evol 91:45–58 Fischl B (2012) FreeSurfer Neuroimage 62:774–781 Folloni D, Sallet J, Khrapitchev AA, Sibson N, Verhagen L, Mars RB (2019) Dichotomous organization of amygdala/temporal-prefron- tal bundles in both humans and monkeys. Elife 8:e47175 Fouts RS (1973) Acquisition and testing of gestural signs in four young chimpanzees. Science 180:978–980 Gao Y, Parvathaneni P, Schilling KG, Wang F, Stepniewska I, Xu Z, Choe AS, Ding Z, Gore JC, Chen LM, Landman BA, Anderson AW (2016) A 3D high resolution ex vivo white matter atlas of the common squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus) based on diffusion tensor imaging. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 9784 Gardner RA, Gardner BT (1969) Teaching sign language to a chimpan- zee: A standardized system of gestures provides a means of two- way communication with a chimpanzee. Science 165:664–672 Hecht EE, Gutman DA, Bradley BA, Preuss TM, Stout D (2015) Virtual dissection and comparative connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in chimpanzees and humans. Neuroimage 108:124–137 Heuer K, Gulban OF, Bazin PL, Osoianu A, Valabregue R, Santin M, Herbin M, Toro R (2019) Evolution of neocortical folding: a phylogenetic comparative analysis of MRI from 34 primate spe- cies. Cortex 118:275–291 Inoue Y, Sinun W, Yosida S, Okanoya K (2017) Combinatory rules and chunk structure in male Mueller’s gibbon songs. Interact Stud 18:1–25 Jbabdi S, Lehman JF, Haber SN, Behrens TE (2013) Human and mon- key ventral prefrontal fibers use the same organizational princi- ples to reach their targets: tracing versus tractography. J Neurosci 33:3190–3201 Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM (2012) FSL. Neuroimage 62:782–790 Latini F, Martensson J, Larsson EM, Fredrikson M, Ahs F, Hjortberg M, Aldskogius H, Ryttlefors M (2017) Segmentation of the infe- rior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain: A white matter dissection and diffusion tensor tractography study. Brain Res 1675:102–115 Maier-Hein KH, Neher PF, Houde J-C, Côté M-A, Garyfallidis E, Zhong J, Chamberland M, Yeh F-C, Lin Y-C, Ji Q, Reddick WE, Glass JO, Chen DQ, Feng Y, Gao C, Wu Y, Ma J, Renjie H, Li Q, Westin C-F, Deslauriers-Gauthier S, González JOO, Paquette M, St-Jean S, Girard G, Rheault F, Sidhu J, Tax CMW, Guo F, Mesri HY, Dávid S, Froeling M, Heemskerk AM, Leemans A, Boré A, Pinsard B, Bedetti C, Desrosiers M, Brambati S, Doyon J, Sarica A, Vasta R, Cerasa A, Quattrone A, Yeatman J, Khan AR, Hodges W, Alexander S, Romascano D, Barakovic M, Auría A, Esteban O, Lemkaddem A, Thiran J-P, Cetingul HE, Odry BL, Mailhe B, Nadar MS, Pizzagalli F, Prasad G, Villalon-Reina JE, Galvis J, Thompson PM, Requejo FDS, Laguna PL, Lacerda LM, Barrett R, Dell’Acqua F, Catani M, Petit L, Caruyer E, Daducci A, Dyrby TB, Holland-Letz T, Hilgetag CC, Stieltjes B, Descoteaux M. 2017. The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nature Communications. 8. Makris N, Kennedy DN, McInerney S, Sorensen AG, Wang R, Cavi- ness VS, Pandya DN (2005) Segmentation of subcomponents within the superior longitudinal fascicle in humans: a quantitative, in vivo DT-MRI Study. Cereb Cortex 15:854–869 Malikovic A, Vucetic B, Milisavljevic M, Tosevski J, Sazdanovic P, Milojevic B, Malobabic S (2012) Occipital sulci of the human brain: variability and morphometry. Anat Sci Int 87:61–70 Marcus D, Harwell J, Olsen T, Hodge M, Glasser M, Prior F, Jenkin- son M, Laumann T, Curtiss S, Van Essen D (2011) Informatics and data mining tools and strategies for the human connectome project. Front Neuroinform 5:4 Mars RB, Neubert F-X, Verhagen L, Sallet J, Miller KL, Dunbar RIM, Barton RA (2014) Primate comparative neuroscience using magnetic resonance imaging: promises and challenges. Front Neurosci 8:298 Mars RB, Verhagen L, Gladwin TE, Neubert F-X, Sallet J, Rush- worth MFS (2016) Comparing brains by matching connectivity profiles. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 60:90–97 Mars RB, Passingham RE, Jbabdi S (2018a) Connectivity finger- prints: from areal descriptions to abstract spaces. Trends Cogn Sci 22:1026–1037 Mars RB, Sotiropoulos SN, Passingham RE, Sallet J, Verhagen L, Khrapitchev AA, Sibson N, Jbabdi S (2018b) Whole brain com- parative anatomy using connectivity blueprints. Elife 7:e35237 Mars RB, O’Muircheartaigh J, Folloni D, Li L, Glasser MF, Jbabdi S, Bryant KL (2019) Concurrent analysis of white matter bun- dles and grey matter networks in the chimpanzee. Brain Struct Funct 224:1021–1033 Miller JA, Weiner KS (2022) Unfolding the evolution of human cog- nition. Trends Cogn Sci 26:735–737 Miller JA, Voorhies WI, Li X, Raghuram I, Palomero-Gallagher N, Zilles K, Sherwood CC, Hopkins WD, Weiner KS (2020) Sul- cal morphology of ventral temporal cortex is shared between humans and other hominoids. Sci Rep 10(1):17132 Ochiai T, Grimault S, Scavarda D, Roch G, Hori T, Rivière D, Man- gin JF, Régis J (2004) Sulcal pattern and morphology of the superior temporal sulcus. Neuroimage 22:706–719 Palomero-Gallagher N, Hoffstaedter F, Mohlberg H, Eickhoff SB, Amunts K, Zilles K (2019) Human pregenual anterior cingulate cortex: structural, functional, and connectional heterogeneity. Cereb Cortex 29:2552–2574 Petrides M (2011) The human cerebral cortex. An MRI atlas of the sulci and gyri in MNI sterotaxic space. Academic Press, Amsterdam Reveley C, Seth AK, Pierpaoli C, Silva AC, Yu D, Saunders RC, Leo- pold DA, Ye FQ (2015) Superficial white matter fiber systems impede detection of long-range cortical connections in diffusion MR tractography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E2820-2828 Rilling JK (2014) Comparative primate neuroimaging: insights into human brain evolution. Trends Cogn Sci 18:46–55 Rilling JK, Glasser MF, Preuss TM, Ma X, Zhao T, Hu X, Behrens TEJ (2008) The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI. Nat Neurosci 11:426–428 Roumazeilles L, Eichert N, Bryant KL, Folloni D, Sallet J, Vijaya- kumar S, Foxley S, Tendler BC, Jbabdi S, Reveley C, Verhagen L, Dershowitz LB, Guthrie M, Flach E, Miller KL, Mars RB (2020) Longitudinal connections and the organization of the temporal cortex in macaques, great apes, and humans. PLoS Biol 18:e3000810 1854 Brain Structure and Function (2024) 229:1839–1854 1 3 Roumazeilles L, Lange FJ, Benn RA, Andersson JLR, Bertelsen MF, Manger PR, Flach E, Khrapitchev AA, Bryant KL, Sallet J, Mars RB (2022) Cortical morphology and white matter tractography of three phylogenetically distant primates: evidence for a simian elaboration. Cereb Cortex 32:1608–1624 Savage-Rumbaugh S, McDonald K, Sevcik RA, Hopkins WD, Rubert E (1986) Spontaneous symbol acquisition and communicative use by pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus). J Exp Psychol Gen 115:211–235 Schilling K, Gao Y, Janve V, Stepniewska I, Landman BA, Anderson AW (2017) Confirmation of a gyral bias in diffusion MRI fiber tractography. Hum Brain Mapp 39:1449–1466 Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN (2006) Fiber pathways of the brain. Oxford University Press, Oxford Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN, Wang R, Dai G, D’Arceuil HE, de Cres- pigny AJ, Wedeen VJ (2007) Association fibre pathways of the brain: parallel observations from diffusion spectrum imaging and autoradiography. Brain 130:630–653 Schoenemann PT, Sheehan MJ, Glotzer LD (2005) Prefrontal white matter volume is disproportionately larger in humans than in other primates. Nat Neurosci 8:242–252 Swiegers J, Bhagwandin A, Sherwood CC, Bertelsen MF, Maseko BC, Hemingway J, Rockland KS, Molnár Z, Manger PR (2019) The distribution, number, and certain neurochemical identities of infracortical white matter neurons in a lar gibbon (Hylobates lar) brain. J Compar Neurol 527:1633–1653 Tendler BC, Hanayik T, Ansorge O, Bangerter-Christensen S, Berns GS, Bertelsen MF, Bryant KL, Foxley S, van den Heuvel M, Prof HAF, Huszar IN, Khrapitchev AA, Leonte A, Manger PR, Menke RA, Mollink J, Mortimer D, Pallebage-Gamarallage M, Roumazeilles L, Sallet J, Scholtens LH, Scott C, Smart A, Turner MR, Wang C, Jbabdi S, Mars RB, Miller KL (2022) The Digital Brain Bank, an open access platform for post-mortem datasets. Elife 11:e73153 Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’Acqua F, Forkel SJ, Simmons A, Vergani F, Murphy DGM, Catani M (2011) A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat Neurosci 14:1245–1246 Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’Acqua F, Valabregue R, Catani M (2012) Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe asso- ciation tracts. Cortex 48:82–96 van den Heuvel MP, de Reus MA, Feldman Barrett L, Scholtens LH, Coopmans FMT, Schmidt R, Preuss TM, Rilling JK, Li L (2015) Comparison of diffusion tractography and tract-tracing measures of connectivity strength in rhesus macaque connectome. Hum Brain Mapp 36:3064–3075 Wakana S, Caprihan A, Panzenboeck MM, Fallon JH, Perry M, Gollub RL, Hua K, Zhang J, Jiang H, Dubey P, Blitz A, van Zijl P, Mori S (2007) Reproducibility of quantitative tractography methods applied to cerebral white matter. Neuroimage 36:630–644 Warrington S, Bryant KL, Khrapitchev AA, Sallet J, Charquero-Ball- ester M, Douaud G, Jbabdi S, Mars RB, Sotiropoulos SN (2020) XTRACT - Standardised protocols for automated tractography in the human and macaque brain. Neuroimage 217:116923 Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. A map of white matter tracts in a lesser ape, the lar gibbon Abstract Introduction Results Sulcal anatomy White matter tracts Dorsal longitudinal tracts Temporal association tracts Limbic tracts Short tracts Interhemispheric tracts Corticospinal and somatosensory pathways Thalamic projections Discussion Materials and methods Data Surface reconstruction Tractography Tractography recipes Dorsal tracts Superior longitudinal fasciculi and arcuate fasciculus Temporal tracts Middle longitudinal fasciculus Inferior longitudinal fasciculus Inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus Uncinate fasciculus Limbic tracts Cingulum bundle Fornix Short tracts Frontal aslant Vertical occipital fasciculus Corticospinal and somatosensory pathways (CSP) Interhemispheric tracts Forceps major and minor Anterior commissure Middle cerebellar peduncle Thalamic projections Thalamic radiations Acoustic and optic radiations Surface projection maps Comparative analyses Acknowledgements References