The investigation of the integrative function of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) in human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines Catherine Mary Worsley A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Johannesburg, 2008 ii DECLARATION I declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work. It is being submitted for the degree of Master of Science in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any other degree or examination at any other University. ________________ Catherine Worsley Date: __________ day of _____________ 20___ iii ABSTRACT The expression of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a non-receptor cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase, is often upregulated in many cancer types. FAK influences cellular adhesion and migration, as well as significantly mediating downstream signalling to components involved in cellular proliferation and survival. Many of these cellular pathways are facilitated by the interaction of FAK with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is overexpressed in human squamous cell carcinoma. This cancer type is highly prevalent in South Africa and is characterized by extremely aggressive clinical behaviour and very poor patient prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate FAK expression, localization, and the effects of EGFR activation on the expression and tyrosine phosphorylation status of FAK in order to shed light on the migratory behaviour of human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. This is the first study that semi-quantifiably details FAK expression in 5 South African human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines as demonstrated by western blot analysis. Furthermore, as shown by indirect immunofluorescence, FAK is localized to focal contacts within migratory structures as well as being abundantly present within the cytoplasm of the oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Localization of FAK to the migratory front of these cells may promote focal adhesion turnover and stimulate cell migration in these cell lines. This study is also the first demonstration in this cancer type that illustrates the modulation of the expression, cellular localization, proteolytic cleavage and tyrosine phosphorylation status of FAK by active EGFR. These findings may uncover some of the molecular mechanisms by which upregulated cell movement influences the metastatic behaviour of this cancer. Furthermore, the results presented in this study identify FAK as a key candidate for anti-cancer therapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. iv LIST OF ASSOCIATED PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Worsley CM; Driver G; and Veale RB: ILK phosphorylation of PTEN in human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HOSCC). SASBMB XX Conference, Pietermaritzburg. 3 - 6 July 2006 v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the personal and professional support and assistance of many people. My heartfelt thanks and appreciation go to: Jesus Christ ? I can do all things through Him who gives me strength. My supervisor, Professor Rob Veale, for his guidance, wisdom, support, encouragement, and excellent sense of humour that has kept me motivated throughout my postgraduate studies. Elsab? Scott, for her patience and for instilling a sense of calm in the lab, as well as for teaching me that tissue culture is an art and has very little (if anything) to do with science. Both the past and present members of the Cell Biology Lab ? Belinda Bezuidenhout, Bronwyn Thomson, Cassandra Taylor, Ciara Metcalfe, Glenn Driver, Mark Killick, Lindsay McCutcheon, Nicolene Shaw, Stephanie Fanucchi, and Yael Dahan, as well as the support staff, for all the advice and assistance that you gave. Special thanks to Belinda, Nicolene, and Yael for making me laugh and buying me coffee whenever things were not going according to plan. Enormous appreciation also goes to Yael who kindly offered to proof-read this dissertation. Caroline Lalkhan, for her assistance with the confocal microscope. Personal thanks go to my entire family, especially my parents Tina and Alan Worsley, and to my brother Jonathan, for their constant love, support, and encouragement. Many thanks go to the National Research Foundation and the University of the Witwatersrand for funding. vi CONTENTS DECLARATION ?????????????????????????...ii ABSTRACT ???????????????????????????..iii LIST OF ASSOCIATED PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ???..iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ?????????????????????..v LIST OF FIGURES ????????????????????????..xi LIST OF TABLES ????????????????????????..xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS ????????????..xiv CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION.........................................................1 1.1 Cancer cells are self-sufficient in producing growth signals and in evading apoptosis ???????????????????????????????1 1.2 Cell adhesion is essential for the formation and functioning of multicellular organisms ??????????????????????????????..3 1.3 Cadherins mediate interactions between adjacent cells ???????????...3 1.4 Within focal adhesions, integrins mediate interactions between the cell and the extracellular environment ...............................................................................................4 1.5 Cell migration is a prominent feature of malignancy ????????????...6 1.6 Focal adhesion kinase mediates integrin-dependent signalling upon focal adhesion formation ??????????????????????????..8 1.7 Cell adhesion influences the regulation of FAK activity .............................................11 1.8 Cell proliferation and survival is promoted by FAK signalling ????????.13 1.9 Cell spreading and migration are regulated by FAK ???????????.....15 1.10 Deregulation of FAK protein expression and activity leads to disease ????...17 vii 1.11 Human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (HOSCC) is a multi-factorial disease with an aggressive phenotype ??????????????????.19 1.12 Several genes are implicated in the pathology of HOSCC ??????...??....20 1.13 The exact molecular pathogenesis of HOSCC is not clearly defined ?????...22 1.14 Research aims and objectives ?????????????????????..23 CHAPTER 2: PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND LOCALIZATION OF FAK IN HOSCC CELL LINES ???????????????????????24 2.1 Introduction ?????????????????????????????24 2.2 Methods and Materials ????????????????????????..29 2.2.1 Cell lines ??????????...?????????????????..29 2.2.2 Antibodies ?????????????????????...?????...29 2.2.3 Preparation of whole-cell lysates ??????????????????.29 2.2.4 Protein estimation ????????????????????????.30 2.2.5 Separation of proteins by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) ?????????????...........................30 2.2.6 Western blot analysis ???????????????????????31 2.2.7 Densitometry ??????????????????????????..32 2.2.8 Indirect Immunofluorescence ???????????????????..32 2.3 Results ???????????????????????????????..34 2.3.1 FAK protein is expressed in 5 moderately differentiated HOSCC cell lines ??????????????????????????????.34 2.3.2 Cellular distribution of FAK in HOSCC cell lines ???????????.37 2.4 Discussion ??????????????????????????????41 CHAPTER 3: EGFR ACTIVATION IMPACTS ON FAK PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PHOSPHORYLATION STATUS IN HOSCC CELL LINES ?????????????????????????????...46 3.1 Introduction ?????????????????????????????46 3.2 Methods and Materials ????????????????????????..51 3.2.1 Cell lines and epidermal growth factor treatment ???????????.51 3.2.2 Antibodies ???????????????????????????..51 3.2.3 Preparation of whole-cell extracts of EGF-treated HOSCC cell lines ???.51 3.2.4 Cell membrane protein-enhancing Triton X-100 extractions ??????...51 3.2.5 Protein estimations ???????????????????????....52 viii 3.2.6 SDS-PAGE separation of cell extracts ????????????????52 3.2.7 Anti-phosphotyrosine Immunoprecipitation ?????????????..53 3.2.8 Western Blot Analysis ??????????????????????...54 3.2.9 Densitometry ??????????????????????????..54 3.3 Results ???????????????????????????????..55 3.3.1 EGF stimulation causes alterations in FAK protein expression in HOSCC cell lines ??????????????..........................................................55 3.3.2 Membrane protein-enhanced extracts of HOSCC cell lines constitute an extensive diversity of polypeptides ???????????..........................59 3.3.3 Two variants of the FAK protein are observed at the cell membrane in the HOSCC cell lines ????????????????????????..61 3.3.4 The 85 kDa variant of FAK is formed as a result of cellular processing prior to the protein extraction procedure ?????????????????63 3.3.5 EGF treatment affects the concentration of the FAK variants at the plasma membrane ????????????????????????.64 3.3.6 The 85 kDa variant of FAK co-immunoprecipitates with tyrosine- phosphorylated proteins ?????????????????????...68 3.3.7 EGF influences the concentration of the 85 kDa FAK variant associated with tyrosine-phosphorylation at the cell membrane ????????.................69 3.4 Discussion ??????????????????????????????73 3.4.1 EGFR activation alters FAK protein expression in HOSCC cell lines ???73 3.4.2 Full-length FAK, as well as the 85 kDa variant, are detected at the cell membrane of HOSCC cell lines ?????????????????.......75 3.4.3 EGFR activation may influence the expression and localization of the FAK variants in the HOSCC cell lines ????????.........................................77 3.4.4 EGFR signalling appears to influence the phosphorylation state of FAK in the HOSCC cell lines ??????????????????????81 CHAPTER 4: GENERAL DISCUSSION ??????.....................................85 4.1 FAK protein expression and cellular localization influences cell behaviour ............85 4.2 Cell survival and migration in HOSCC cell lines may be influenced by FAK signalling..........................................................................................................................91 4.3 FAK is implicated in EGFR signalling .........................................................................94 4.4 Clinical trials are exploring the advantages of FAK-specific cancer therapies ......102 4.5 FAK may be an important molecule contributing to the clinicopathological factors associated with HOSCC ...............................................................................................104 CHAPTER 5: APPENDIX ?????????????????????106 5.1 Tissue Culture ???????????????????????????..106 ix 5.2 Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) ???????????????????...107 5.3 Laemmli Lysis Buffer ????????????????????????...107 5.4 Phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride (PMSF) stock solution ??????????...107 5.5 PBS/PMSF/Trazylol solution ?????????????????????...107 5.6 0.5% Triton X-100 Extraction Buffer ??????????????????108 5.7 0.5% Triton X-100 Extraction Buffer with complete, Mini, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail ??????????????????????????..108 5.8 Protein Estimation ??????????????????????????108 5.9 SDS-PAGE ?????????????????????????????109 5.10 Western Blot Analysis ????????????????????????110 5.11 Indirect Immunofluorescence ????????????????????...112 5.12 Co-Immunoprecipitation Analysis ???????????????????112 5.13 Determination of protein concentration of whole-cell lysates of the 5 HOSCC cell lines ???????????????????????????????..113 5.14 Determination of the relative molecular weight of proteins separated by 10% SDS-PAGE ????????????????????????????..113 5.15 Raw densitometric data of western blot showing FAK protein expression levels in whole-cell lysates ?????????????????????????114 5.16 Determination of protein concentration of whole-cell lysates of EGF-treated HOSCC cell lines ?????????????????????????....114 5.17 Raw densitometric data obtained from FAK-specific western blots of EGF-treated whole-cell lysates ????????????????????.115 5.18 Determination of protein concentration of Triton X-100 membrane extracts of HOSCC cell lines ??????????????????????????115 5.19 Raw densitometric data of western blot showing the 85 kDa and 125 kDa FAK variants in Triton X-100 membrane extracts of HOSCC cells ???????..116 x 5.20 Determination of protein concentration of Triton X-100 membrane extraction of SNO with and without a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) ????????116 5.21 Determination of protein concentration of Triton X-100 membrane extracts of EGF-treated HOSCC cell lines ????????????????????117 5.22 Raw densitometric data obtained from western blots of Triton X-100 membrane extracts of EGF-treated HOSCC cells ?????????????????.117 5.23 Raw densitometric data obtained from western blots of EGF-treated membrane extracts immunoprecipitated with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody and blotted with FAK ?????????????????????????????118 CHAPTER 6: REFERENCES ???????????????????..119 xi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: FAK structural features and binding partners ???????????..10 Figure 1.2: A model of ?1-integrin-mediated FAK activation ??????????.10 Figure 2.1: Integrin-mediated signalling via FAK results in focal adhesion turnover and cell migration ????.............................................................................27 Figure 2.2: Whole-cell lysates of HOSCC cell lines resolved by SDS-PAGE ??.........35 Figure 2.3: The FAK protein is present in whole-cell lysates of HOSCC cell lines ??36 Figure 2.4: The cellular distribution of FAK in WHCO6 was examined by indirect immunofluorescence using an antibody targeted to the N-terminus of FAK ????????????????????????????...38 Figure 2.5: FAK-specific indirect immunofluorescence conducted on the WHCO1, WHCO3, WHCO5 and SNO HOSCC cell lines ????????..??..40 Figure 3.1: EGFR and FAK signalling ???????????????????...48 Figure 3.2: Whole-cell lysates of EGF-treated WHCO1 resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE ??????????????????????????.56 Figure 3.3: Cellular expression of the 125 kDa FAK protein following EGF treatment of HOSCC cell lines ?????????????????...58 Figure 3.4: EGF treatment affects the expression of the 125 kDa FAK protein detected in whole-cell extracts of HOSCC cell lines ?????????.59 Figure 3.5: Triton X-100 membrane extracts of the HOSCC cell lines resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE ???????????????????????...60 Figure 3.6: Two FAK variants are present in Triton X-100 membrane extracts of all 5 HOSCC cell lines ??????????????????????...62 Figure 3.7: FAK protein stability in Triton X-100 membrane extracts ??????..63 Figure 3.8: FAK protein expression in response to EGF stimulation of HOSCC cell lines ????????????????????????????...66 Figure 3.9: EGF treatment affects the protein concentration of both the 125 kDa and 85 kDa FAK variants ?????????????????????...67 Figure 3.10: EGF alters the concentration of the 85 kDa variant of FAK at the cell membrane in phosphotyrosine-immunoprecipitated samples ?????71 Figure 3.11: EGF stimulation affects the levels of phosphotyrosine associated with the 85 kDa variant of FAK ???????????????????.72 Figure 5.1: Standard curve of absorbance (at 596 nm) versus protein concentration of BSA standards in single lysis buffer ??????????????113 xii Figure 5.2: Standard curve of relative molecular weight (log) versus distance migrated (mm) by the molecular weight marker ??????????113 Figure 5.3: Standard curve of ansorbance (at 596 nm) versus protein concentration of BSA standards in single lysis buffer ??????????????114 Figure 5.4: Standard curve of absorbance (at 596 nm) versus protein concentration of BSA standards in Triton X-100 membrane extraction buffer ???..115 Figure 5.5: Standard curve of absorbance (at 596 nm) versus protein concentration of BSA standards in Triton X-100 membrane extraction buffer ???..116 Figure 5.6: Standard curve of absorbance (at 596 nm) versus protein concentration of BSA standards in Triton X-100 membrane extraction buffer ???..117 xiii LIST OF TABLES Table 5.1: Optical density values obtained by LabWorks? analysis of polypeptide bands generated by FAK-specific western blot analysis of whole-cell lysates ????????????????????????????114 Table 5.2: Optical density values obtained using LabWorks? analysis of the 125 kDa band generated by FAK-specific western blot analysis of whole- cell lysates following EGF treatment of HOSCC cell lines ??????..115 Table 5.3: Optical density values obtained using LabWorks? analysis of FAK- specific western blotting of Triton X-100 membrane extracts of the HOSCC cell lines ???????????????????????.116 Table 5.4: Optical density values obtained using LabWorks? analysis of the 125 kDa bands generated by FAK-specific western blot analysis of membrane extracts following EGF treatment of HOSCC cell lines ??..117 Table 5.5: Optical density values obtained using LabWorks? analysis of the 85 kDa bands generated by FAK-specific western blot analysis of membrane extracts following EGF treatment of HOSCC cell lines ??..118 Table 5.6: Optical density values obtained using LabWorks? analysis of the 85 kDa bands generated by FAK-specific western blot analysis after EGF treatment of HOSCC cell lines and immunoprecipitation with an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody ?????????????????118 xiv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS A adenine ? alpha APC adenomatous polyposis coli APS ammonium persulphate ATP adenine triphosphate ? beta Bad Bcl-2 associated death protein Bis N?,N?,-methylenebis-acrylamide BSA bovine serum albumin ?C degrees Celsius CAM cell adhesion molecule CAS Crk-associated substrate caspase cysteine-dependent aspartate-directed protease CDK cyclin-dependent kinase cDNA complementary deoxyribonucleic acid CO2 carbon dioxide c-Src cellular-Src C-terminal carboxy-terminal Da Dalton(s) dH2O distilled water DMEM Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium DNA deoxyribonucleic acid E-cadherin epithelial-cadherin ECM extracellular matrix EDTA ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid EGF epidermal growth factor EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor ERK extracellular signal-regulated kinase FAK focal adhesion kinase FAT focal adhesion targeting xv FCS foetal calf serum FERM band 4.1, ezrin, radixin, moesin FITC fluorosceine isothiocyanate FRNK FAK related non-kinase ? gamma g gram(s) x g gravitational units G guanine Grb2/7 growth factor receptor binding protein 2/7 GSK3? glycogen synthase kinase 3? GTP guanine triphosphate GTPase guanine triphosphatase HASM human airway smooth muscle HGF/SF hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor HOSCC human oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma HPV human papilloma virus hr(s) hour(s) HRP horseradish peroxidase IAP inhibitor-of-apoptosis protein IB immunoblot Ig immunoglobulin IgCAMs immunoglobulin superfamily of cell adhesion molecules ILK integrin-linked kinase IP immunoprecipitation JNK Jun N-terminal kinase ? kappa k kilo kDa kilodalton(s) l litre(s) LD2 leucine aspartate repeat 2 Lef lymphoid enhancing factor Lys lysine xvi ? micro ?g microgram(s) ?l microlitre(s) M molar mA milliampere(s) MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinase MDM2 murine double minute 2 min minute(s) ml millilitre(s) mm millimetre(s) mM millimolar MMP matrix metalloprotease mRNA messenger ribonucleic acid MW molecular weight NF-?B nuclear factor kappa B ng nanogram(s) nm nanometre(s) N-terminal amino-terminal PAGE polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis PAK p21-activated kinase PBS phosphate buffered saline PCR polymerase chain reaction PDGF platelet-derived growth factor PDGFR platelet-derived growth factor receptor PI3K phosphatidylinositol 3?-kinase PIP3 phosphatidylinositol-(3,4,5) triphosphate PKB/Akt protein kinase B PLC? phospholipase C? PMSF phenyl-methyl-sulphonyl fluoride pRb retinoblastoma protein PTB phosphotyrosine binding PTEN phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 xvii PTK protein tyrosine kinase PTP protein tyrosine phosphatase Rho Ras homologue RNA ribonucleic acid RNAi ribonucleic acid interference RTK receptor tyrosine kinase SDS sodium dodecyl sulphate SDS-PAGE sodium dodecyl sulphate ? polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sec second(s) SH2/3 Src homology 2/3 Shc Src homology containing protein SHIP-2 Src-homology-domain 2-containing tyrosine phosphatase-2 SFK Src family kinase(s) siRNA small interfering ribonucleic acid SOS son of sevenless STAT signal transducer and activator of transcription TBS tris-buffered saline TCA tri-chloroacetic acid Tcf T-cell factor TEMED N?,N?,N?,N?-tetramethylene-diamine TGF? transforming growth factor alpha Tris tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane Tyr tyrosine uPA urokinase-type plasminogen activator uPAR urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor UV ultraviolet V volt(s) VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor v-Src viral Src WHCO Witwatersrand human carcinoma of the oesophagus Y tyrosine 1