THE RAND DAILY MAIL AND THE 1976 SOWETO RIOTS. AN EXAMINATION OF THE TRADITION OF LIBERAL JOURNALISM IN SOUTH AFRICA AS ILLUSTRATED BY THE RAND DAILY MAIL COVERAGE OF THE SOWETO UPRISING ON JUNE 16, 1976. Submitted by Samantha Keogh A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Arts, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, in partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Arts in Journalism and Media Studies. Johannesburg 2005 ii ABSTRACT This research examined the notion of liberal journalism in South Africa during apartheid as practiced at the RDM. It considered whether the paper, facing government scrutiny and restrictive laws, adhered to the principals of liberal journalism and how successfully it did so. The 1976 Soweto Uprising was used to assess the newspaper?s performance and the merits of arguments for and against the notion of it being a successful example of a liberal newspaper. Content analysis and interviews with RDM staff members, was used to assess the paper?s conduct. These primary sources were examined in conjunction with available literature and criticisms against the English press and RDM presented in testimonies at the TRCMH to assess the paper?s reportage and how valid criticisms against it were. The researcher concluded that, due to serious shortcomings, which included its reporting of the uprising, the RDM was not a successful liberal newspaper. iii DECLARATION I declare that this dissertation is my own unaided work. It is submitted for the degree of Master of Arts in Journalism and Media Studies to the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. It has not been submitted before for any other degree or examination in any other university. __________________ Samantha Keogh This 31st day of January 2005 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my thanks to the following people, without whom the completion of this work would not have been possible. ? My parents, Kevin and Avril Keogh, for their help, love and support and the encouragement they gave me throughout. ? My grandmothers, Jean Wesson for her infinite faith in me and her support during the research and writing of this thesis and Joyce Keogh for proof reading the work and showing such interest in and enthusiasm for the project. ? Supervisors, Prof Anton Harber and Prof Peter Delius for their guidance. ? My friends Kerry-Lee Schwikkard, Rian Pretorius and Nico Fouche for their support and encouragement. ? The interviewees who agreed to share their memories and time with me. ? The staff at the Wits library ? African Collection and Historical papers for their help in finding and accessing secondary research material needed for this research. ? The staff of the South African National Library (Pretoria) for all their help in accessing copies of the Rand Daily Mail and helping with the photocopying of newspaper content. v TABLE OF CONTENTS: Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Liberalism 3 1.2 Liberal Journalism 4 1.3 Liberalism in South Africa and at the RDM 5 1.4 Literature 6 1.5 Methodology 8 1.5.1 The Truth and Reconciliation Media Hearings 8 1.5.2 Content analysis 10 1.5.3 Interviews 13 1.5.4 Reliability and validity of interview transcripts 16 1.6 Chapter breakdown 17 Chapter 2: Critiques of the Rand Daily Mail 19 2.1 Editorial department 21 2.1.1 Editors 21 2.1.2 Editorial policy 22 2.1.3 Views of Liberal Journalism 25 2.2 Advertising and readership 26 2.3 Owner and management control 30 2.4 Prisons stories and trial 30 2.5 Opposition press 33 Chapter 3: Critiques of the RDM 35 3.1 Legislation 36 3.2 Human rights violations 37 3.3 Working conditions 39 3.4 Detained 40 3.5 Training 41 3.6 Township Extra 42 3.7 Principals 42 Chapter 4: How valid were these critiques? 46 4.1 Effects of government legislation 46 4.2 Township Extra 51 4.3 Spies 56 4.4 Human rights violations 58 vi 4.5 Working conditions and separate amenities 60 4.6 Training 61 4.7 Fired while in jail 64 4.8 Media?s role in apartheid society 65 Chapter 5: The RDM in action 66 5.1 Research design 66 5.2 What could be expected from the RDM ? 70 5.3 The lead up to the Soweto Uprising 71 5.3.1 Warnings 73 5.3.2 Fair and adequate coverage 75 5.3.3 Language 78 5.3.4. Police Brutality 79 5.3.5 Treatment of headlines and photos 81 5.4 Coverage of the Soweto Uprising 83 5.4.1 Fair and accurate reporting 84 5.4.2 Language 86 5.4.3 Police brutality 87 5.4.4 Student violence 90 5.4.5 Treatment of headlines and photos 91 Chapter 6: Conclusion 96 6.1 Meeting the challenge 97 6.2 Falling short 101 6.3 A final analysis 104 References 107 Bibliography 112 Appendix A: Laws that bound newspapers 121 Appendix B: Interviews 133 B1. Gordon Amos 135 B2 Doc Bakitsha 146 B3 Patrick Laurence 158 B4 Raymond Louw 166 B5 Peter Magubane 204 B6 John Mojapela 214 B7 Benjamin Pogrund 223 vii B8 Gavin Stewart 245 B9 Gabu Tugwana 252 B10 Transcript comparison 266 Appendix C: Content analysis 267 viii ABBREVIATIONS The following is a list of abbreviations used in this research: ? ANC ? African National Congress. ? NP ? National Party (also known as the Nats). ? NPU ? Newspaper Press Union. ? PP ? Progressive Party (also known as the Progs). ? RDM ? Rand Daily Mail. ? SAAN ? South African Associated Newspapers. ? SAHRC ? South African Human Rights Commission. ? TRCMH ? Truth and Reconciliation Commission Media Hearings. ? UP ? United Party.