Policies for evidence: a comparative analysis of Africa’s national evaluation policy landscape
Date
2021-01-12
Authors
Dr Chirau, Takunda
Blaser-Mapitsa, Caitlin
Amisi, Matodzi
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Evidence &Policy
Abstract
Description
African countries are developing their monitoring and evaluation policies to systematise, structure and institutionalise evaluations and use of evaluative evidence across the government sector. The pace at which evaluations are institutionalised and systematised across African governments is progressing relatively slowly.
Aims and objectives: This article offers a comparative analysis of Africa’s national evaluation policy landscape. The article looks at the policies of Zimbabwe, South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya (not adopted) and Uganda. To achieve the aim we unpack the different characteristics taken by the national evaluation policies, emerging lessons for countries who wish to develop a national evaluation policy, and key challenges faced by countries with regard to evaluation policy development and implementation. The article draws on both a desktop review and action research approaches from the Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results Anglophone Africa to build national evaluation systems across the region. The approach has included peer learning and co-creation of knowledge around public sector evaluation systems.
Keywords
Monitoring and Evaluation, Policies for evidence, National Evaluation System