Comparison of parents' evaluation of developmental status and professional assessment for early detection of developmental disorders in infants born at term with birth asphyxia at Tembisa hospital
Date
2016-03-11
Authors
Mbuyi, Faustin Kabasele
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Background: Screening tools that rely on parents’ information are effective tests used in
child health to improve developmental outcomes. The PEDS combined questionnaires are
designed for the overall developmental assessment of children aged 0-8 years and
facilitate early intervention programs.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the PEDS combined and health professionals
‘developmental assessment as part of routine standard of care in eliciting
neurodevelopment deviations in infants born at term with history of birth asphyxia at
Tembisa Hospital, a public health care sector in South Africa.
Method: The present study is a descriptive cross sectional study. The developmental
outcomes from the routine professional assessments were obtained from the review of
medical records. Parents were asked to answer the PEDS combined questionnaires when
their child was 6-12 months old to elicit developmental milestones in the infants. The
comparative analysis was determined using the Kappa coefficient.
Results: The study sample included 34 infants and their parents (N=34). The PEDS
combined questionnaires found that 7 (21%) infants had variable developmental concerns
and unmet milestones, while the review of medical records revealed that 3 (9%) infants
had development that was not age appropriate. The overall resulting kappa agreement
between the PEDS combined and the routine professional assessment was moderate (K=
0.544, 95% CI 0.170 to 0.917); with the PEDS combined more likely to identify
developmental concerns and unmet milestones which included gross motor (K= 0.622),
fine motor (K= 0.785), self-help (K= 0.532), socio-emotional (K˂ 0.20) and communication
(K˂ 0.20). On the contrary, the routine professional assessment was more likely to identify
an infant with other/health concerns (K˂ 0.20).
Conclusion: The PEDS combined screening test was more likely to identify more infants
at risk of developmental problems. On the other hand, routine professional assessment,
used in isolation, presented a risk of under-detection of developmental issues and could
result in lack of referral of infants for early intervention. Socio-demographic characteristics
did not influence the information provided by parents. If presented with standardised
screening questionnaires, all parents can give accurate information about their child.
Description
A research report submission to the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the
Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science
in Medicine: Child Health and Neurodevelopment
2015