Engaging informal settlements as landscapes of place: reconceptualising urban communities in the struggle for in SITU upgrading.
Date
2014-02-04
Authors
Kornienko, Kristen
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This study investigates the role of space and place in urban informal settlement
upgrading. The key aim is a better understanding of the character and functionality of
informal communities through their social processes. There is a large body of
literature on the social, economic and spatial consequences of informal settlement’s
ongoing role of housing the urban poor. This study uses an ethnographic approach
to investigate the spaces and places which result from the need based social
relations and political agency of the informal residents. This genre of need reflects
Lefebvre’s description of the tangible and intangible necessities that contribute to
individuals’ livelihood and well-being.
The study explores the philosophical thinking around spatial production and the
meaning of place. It builds on the works of Heidegger, Lefebvre, and Deleuze and
Guattari who attribute value to everyday social process and its role in producing
space. Deleuze and Guattariʼs relational language is used to articulate the fluidity
with which informality engages formality through the rhythm, refrain, milieu and
territorialisation of daily use, leading to a rethinking of boundary and edge. Critically,
the study also draws on the historic and present elements of time as it relates to
space for this group of thinkers. The time/space dynamics of hope lost through
waiting for upgrading and hope gained through impatience, political agency and
action, add layers of complexity to these spaces. Implied in the first dynamic is an
acceptance of the status quo, passive inclusion into South Africaʼs democratic
society through the eventual provision of housing. The second is an insurgent
demand for socio-economic rights and societal transformation as guaranteed by the
Constitution (Holston, 1998).
The resultant qualitative data from two informal settlements in greater Johannesburg
unravels the logic behind informal spatial production via relational connections which
articulate space as a product of informal residents’ social actions. This spatial
understanding suggests a shift away from current spatial models employed by the
State in its formal provision of subsidised housing. At the same time, it strengthens
informal communities’ role in the upgrading process by giving value to the social
qualities of place in existing living environments.