Moving foward by doing analysis

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Whitehead, K A
dc.date.accessioned 2012-11-07T10:13:39Z
dc.date.available 2012-11-07T10:13:39Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.issn 1461-4456
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10539/12163
dc.description.abstract In this article, I address some of the issues for the analysis of categorial features of talk and texts raised by Stokoe’s ‘Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis’. I begin by discussing a number of points raised by Stokoe, relating to previous conversation analytic work that has addressed categorial matters; the implicit distinction in her article between ‘natural’ and ‘contrived’ data; and ambiguity with respect to the (possible) relevance of categories, in particular practices or utterances. I then discuss how my own previous work could be located in light of Stokoe’s discussion of debates and divergences between conversation analysis (CA) and membership categorization analysis (MCA), and argue that being bound by the integrity of the data on which an analysis is based (Schegloff, 2005) should take precedence over attempting to characterize the analysis as exemplifying either a CA- or MCA-based approach. I conclude by calling for a commitment to doing analysis, and pointing to the value of the resources Stokoe offers in this regard. en_ZA
dc.language.iso en en_ZA
dc.publisher Sage en_ZA
dc.subject Action en_ZA
dc.subject conversation analysis en_ZA
dc.subject membership categorization analysis en_ZA
dc.subject sequence en_ZA
dc.title Moving foward by doing analysis en_ZA
dc.type Article en_ZA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search WIReDSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics